User talk:VirguloMane

Hello, VirguloMane and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Rasnaboy (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disruptive editing on Yuga Cycle page

Since 3 September 2020, you have made at least 39 edits, mostly without edit summaries, on the Yuga Cycle page in an attempt to change punctuation and grammar according to your understanding. All of your edits have been reverted, mostly with a recommended practice described in the edit summary. Examples of your edits :

• adding spaces before colons and semicolons
• adding extra commas, which change the meaning of a sentence
• adding a comma after a hyphen (e.g. -,)
• removing ellipsis in quoted text
• modifying quoted text both in citations and block-quotes
• lowercasing the first letter in proper nouns (e.g. hindu)
• changing nouns to singular when there are multiple
• changing verb tense to present when it should be past
• conversing in an edit summary after a revert, even after being told to use a talk page
• etc.

I recently urged you to communicate any changes through a talk page, but you ignored this suggestion and persist at making these edits. To avoid this disruptive back and forth editing and reverting behavior, I again urge you to discontinue editing the Yuga Cycle page directly and discuss any changes on a talk page with sources. A good place to find recommendations is on the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style page, which is a guideline of styling agreed upon by the Wikipedia community. We should all try to follow these guidelines when writing on Wikipedia. Below are some example sources as to why your edits were reverted:

• MOS:CITEPUNCT - "Ref tags are placed after adjacent punctuation, not before".
• MOS:COLON - "no space precedes a colon".
• MOS:DOUBLE SPACE - "In normal text, never put a space before a comma, semicolon, colon".
• MOS:CAPS - "In English, capitalization is primarily needed for proper names, acronyms, and for the first letter of a sentence".
• etc.

Jroberson108 (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In your recent daily edits on Yuga Cycle, you have continued to ignore community guidelines that have been described above. Example, you shouldn't add a space before a semicolon. I have reverted these edits multiple times with an explanation, but you persist with the same disruptive mistakes. It would be better if you stop trying to change punctuation according to your understanding until you have familiarized yourself with the community guidelines. Jroberson108 (talk) 18:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Yuga Cycle, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yuga Cycle repeat edits Oxford comma

Your recent edit on the Yuga Cycle article has been reverted. You removed the use of WP:Oxford commas, which is used throughout and therefore should be used "consistently within an article". You attempted the exact same edit on 3 March 2021‎. There are similar attempted edits on 23 February 2021 and 13 January 2021‎. As I requested earlier on your talk page, you should stop changing punctuation until you have familiarized yourself with the community guidelines found on WP:MOS. Also, you should review the history of an article page, especially if it contains your reverted edit(s), so that you can learn from it and to avoid an WP:EW resulting in a ban. Use talk pages to discuss changes. Finally, it is advisable that you fill in the "Edit Summary" when making edits, which you tend not to do according to your contributions page. Jroberson108 (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Yuga Cycle, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jroberson108 (talk) 13:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuga Cycle. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jroberson108 (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yuga Cycle, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop modifying quoted text, changing citation page numbers, lowercasing the first letter of a sentence. Also stop trying to modify punctuation until you are more familiar with WP:MOS, which has been repeatedly asked in previous messages. Jroberson108 (talk) 10:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Nine" in numbers is not written "ix" but "IX" and "9". Hello and thks to familiarize you with that evident rule before to fill this page, please. VirguloMane (talk) 10:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@VirguloMane: Please provide a link to the WP:MOS rule you are referring to. "ix" and "IX" are both valid Roman numbers. Burgess's book, cited on the Yuga Cycle page with a link, uses a page number of "ix". There is no need to deviate from the source and capitalize it according to your preferences. Converting it to "9" as you did is innacurate since both pages "ix" and "9" exist. You can see this easily by clicking on the cited book's link. Jroberson108 (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In your recent edit on Yuga Cycle, you added a period with an edit summary of but sometimes in your contributions, JRoberson, you've written correcter "page 9" in place of "page ix" ... Why these "sudden" differences ?!. I've mentioned before, don't use the edit summary to communicate with users about something unrelated to the edit. Instead, do it on a talk page and use the "Ping" template to get the user's attention. I'm not sure why you are still confused about why you shouldn't change the referenced page from "ix" to "9"? Simply put, the content is found on page "ix", not page "9", which both pages exist: page ix and page 9 Jroberson108 (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yuga Cycle, you may be blocked from editing.

You made a lot of unnecessary and unconstructive edits that were reverted. Your latest attempt to add a comma to "sfn" templates broke the ref links. You are obviously unfamiliar with how that template works and are blindly editing them. I ask you yet again to stop this disruptive behavior. Jroberson108 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]