This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vincent60030. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article London congestion charge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about that, but having just seen what DavidCane wrote above, in retrospect I think a fail was going to be the only realistic option I'm afraid, as two weeks ago he dropped some serious hints that the article was nowhere near ready - and it isn't. David's a good editor for London Transport articles so it's worth working together with him if possible. Redrose64 is another editor who's worth getting to know as he knows all the railway templates (that make my head hurt) inside out back to front upside down. I really hope you do carry on editing articles, but it might be worth getting one of those two to check over an article before you nominate it for GA in future, just to be on the safe side. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)17:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Just a note about teams, although one person has to actually open the GA nomination, anyone can fix issues raised by the reviewer. For example, Denmark Street was a three way collaboration, though I handled the "paperwork", the actual edits to the article were more or less split evenly. Teams and respect takes some time though, you basically have to show others that you do good writing work - I can't think of any shortcuts, sadly. But all I can say is that if you do good work, people will notice, and mutual collaboration is (imho) one of the nicest surprises Wikipedia can throw at you. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)15:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Strongly agree to your statement. Thanks for reviewing it anyways. I will fix all those issues mentioned and let the rest who are good at the topic improve it further. All the best and keep editing! :) Vincent60030 (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I decided to start off by assisting with other people's GA reviews, with the idea of progressing to nomination, and finally carrying out actual reviews. So far, you'll find my name on 20 or so GA review pages:
but none of them have me as the actual reviewer. I think that I was the nominator in only one case (not listed, see later), but in all these listed I was there mainly to make in-passing responses to either the nominator or the reviewer. In a few cases (like the Yoko Ono one) I went there in response to a general call at some noticeboard or other. Not listed is Talk:NBR 224 and 420 Classes/GA1 - although I wrote most of the article, and nominated it for GA, I wasn't at all involved in the GA. It passed. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angel tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome. This is because we must appreciate what we have now and what good things that other have done for/to us. ;) Vincent60030 (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
It's my pleasure to help Wikipedia by contributing to articles of my interest. I appreciate that comment as well and also thanks for translating it on Italian Wikipedia. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Acton Town tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acton Town tube station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stonebridge Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey, Hi! Check out my user page! (I think you did). Oh and pls sign your comment with four tildes given at the bottom of the edit page. Vincent60030 (talk) 01:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
On 19 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Angel tube station, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Angel has the longest escalators (pictured) on the London Underground network? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angel tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arnos Grove tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheMagikCow -- TheMagikCow (talk) 13:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vincent60030. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
