User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Archives/November 2023

User:Vestrian24Bio

• Home
• Alt acc.
• Talk
• Awards
• Contributions
• Sandbox
• Templates (Talk)
• Logs

This talk page is archived. Threads older than 15 days may be archived, manually or automatically. To browse the archives, select the year and month of posts you want to view. 2022: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2023: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2024: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2025: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec

Champions Trophy edit

Probably the dumbest edit I have seen in a while. I can only assume you didn't read the article - It doesn't contani either "Champions" or "Trophy" and talks about semi-final qualification - and is for a completely different tournament. And the apparent belief that South Africa (who qualified 3 days ago, even on the ICCs web feed) are :not confirmed" is just so utterly hilarious. How are they going to finish 9th or 10th? How? How? Please do better. 110.33.28.251 (talk) 22:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lokesh Cinematic Universe

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lokesh Cinematic Universe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2023 Cricket World Cup into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 14:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Notable Moments at the MTV Video Music Awards (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Notable Moments at the MTV Video Music Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vestrian24Bio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film)

The article The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, Vestrian24Bio,

I'm not sure why you are doing this but please stop moving around your User pages, changing your mind and then moving them to a new, different page title. Just let them be wherever they are at and work on them at that page title. Every time you move a page, it creates a Redirect page and now you probably have more Redirect pages in your User space than you do pages with actual content. All of these page moves are unnecessary. Just consider where you want a page and move it ONCE, not multiple times.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that I've already left a message about your page moves at User talk:Vestrian24Bio#Page moves. I guess it had no effect on your behavior. Please do not do more unnecessary page moves or it could become disruptive editing. Thanks. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that. I haven't moved pages since your last message.

It was just until recent when I noticed a misspelt page in my User namespace; which led to the moves of it and it's subpages.

Again, I'm sorry about this. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 11:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding List of highest-grossing Tamil films

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edit (executing an edit request) to List of highest-grossing Tamil films and cited Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES. However, I cannot find any mention of the New Indian Express, which is the site that I referenced, on that page. Could you please elaborate further? Thanks. Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 14:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Not all the Indian websites are reliable; Some are unreliable as they are fan based or written to get public attention. As per WP:RELIABLESOURCES.
• To make it easier The Indian Cinema Task Force has created a list of reliable sources–WP:ICTFSOURCES.
• This list includes the Indian websites which can be trusted enough; while other websites could contain fake news.
  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Per WP:ICTFSOURCES, The Indian Express is reliable and trustworthy.
• But since the group's split in 1999, the southern edition named The New Indian Express is not considered reliable.
  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I wasn’t aware that the list was intended as an exclusive allowlist Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 18:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 09:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]