I do not appreciate passive aggressive comments such as this one. I always try to discuss. Maybe do not grandstand so much, and try to give the benefit of doubt. Maybe I missed the notification from that talk page discussion or I did not get notified at all (it was the latter case, actually). Regards. ℛonherry☘12:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean it that way, but you didn't discuss and I don't know why.
I apologize too. Even if I didn't get notified, I must've checked the talk page, just in case, before making the edit. ℛonherry☘18:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. All is well, then. I disagree with the decision to put all that information in the other article, but it would be pretty hard to convince others. To me it looks like "impact" not "image" but if the information was already split, there's not much point in trying.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Controls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Please don't create redirects simply to avoid red links from typos people make on discussion pages. If it's an obvious typo and the intended meaning is clear, just correct it. You'll find under WP:TPO that one of the examples of appropriate edits is Fixing links: if the linked-to page has moved, a talk page section has been archived, the link is simply broken by a typographical error, or it unintentionally points to a disambiguation page etc. (emphasis added). If it's unclear, you should not be creating a redirect at all, since changing the link from red to blue changes its meaning. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll do that. If I can fix a link to something that has been archived since the post, then I guess nothing is wrong with fixing the link to a Wikipedia article or something in Wikipedia space.
I have also asked the person who originally posted to correct.
I think the unlikely typos at least (REVERET, GALLEERY, NODEALINES) can be safely deleted. If you agree, you can tag them for speedy deletion with {{db-g7}}. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I obviously got those from somewhere, but I went ahead. If I don't know where they are, there's nothing to fix.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions •
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
