User talk:Vchimpanzee/2023

License tagging for File:WSTP logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WSTP logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible imitator?

Is User:SpikesWrench you? Cause on meta they are claiming to be you so I wanna make sure. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the link and you'll see what I wrote there.

At least here I use the account to see what newbies see and to thank people.

I just got tired of seeing a red link. I don't know how I ended up there.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nah you're alright. Just wanted to make sure it was you and that someone hadn't somehow hacked into your account. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read comic strips and newspaper articles using private browsing because of limits which I can normally get around by closing the private browsing window, and I thanked someone for an edit since I was able to sign in there.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

• New collections:
  • British Newspaper Archive
  • Findmypast
  • University of Michigan Press
  • ACLS
  • Duke University Press
• 1Lib1Ref 2023
• Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malevo

About 15 years ago, a different user (visible in the edit history) undertook a deeply misguided program of just reflexively redirecting a whole lot of purported Argentine film titles to "List of Argentine films of YYYY", absolutely without regard to whether the list actually contained any information about any film of that title or not — the only thing I ever did was to recategorize all of them out of a category they shouldn't have been in to a maintenance category, so that they could be evaluated at a later date for whether any of them were justified or not, but not being all that knowledgeable about Argentine film I haven't undertaken the actual work of doing those assessments. What's even stranger about that one is that the only article that was actually linking to that title was doing so in the context of a 1972 film, not a 1990 film, so it's even more dubious.

I'd imagine that your article idea is almost certainly about the malembo troupe that's been on the world dance tour slash Got Talent circuit in the past few years, instead of a 1990 film — so if that's the case, then just take the title and run with it. But what you're seeing is somebody else who did something he shouldn't have, not anything that I did. Bearcat (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed the dance troupe. Unfortunately, the one source I found so far is more an interview than anything else and I can't establish notability, but it looks like from what you're saying they could be notable.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't personally tried to research much about them, but I suspect there's a lot more about them out there than that — the challenge is that some of it would be in Spanish, a language I can't really read, which is why I haven't really tried to tackle them myself. But that said, I'm going to delete the redirect right away, since it's clear that there are multiple potential topics and the one that people would be most likely looking for at this point isn't a film. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I won't delete it since I now see you've already retargeted it to the concept article about their dance genre. That's a better interim step, so it's all good now. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

• New bundle partners:
  • Newspapers.com
  • Fold3
• 1Lib1Ref January report
• Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

• New partner:
  • Perlego
• Library access tips and tricks
• Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bigger (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. Universe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

• Suggestion improvements
• Favorite collections tips
• Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if there is an error in the title of a ref?

It has been suggested that these be simply corrected however many editors don't like such corrections being made. The best argument I have seen not to make corrections is that someone may wish to use the original text as a search string. Consequently if there have been corrections to faulty spelling then this makes such searching problematic. What I do on ref titles is use an alias of 'notatypo' which is 'as written'. Personally I feel that when a misspelled word has this or say a 'sic' template applied then the word should be obfuscated, always. So, I would typically apply the template as follows {{as written|rec|ieve [sic]}}. This entry format does not cause issues with the CS1/2 template formats which is what the 'sic' template does. You will see here a warning requesting that the sic template not be used in CS1/2 formats (.....because it includes markup that will pollute the COinS metadata.). Regards, Neils51 (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on WBTV

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WBTV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

• New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
• Tech tip: Filters
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Wake Forest University

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wake Forest University, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

• Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
• Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How have you been doing since the last time we talked? ReallyAmazingDude13 (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]