|
User talk:VaudevillianScientistWelcome
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetra-n-butylammonium iodide (January 16)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetra-n-butylammonium iodide has been accepted The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for March 31Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quaternary ammonium cation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Ways to improve Hartmuth C. KolbHello, VaudevillianScientist, Thank you for creating Hartmuth C. Kolb. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC) April 2022
Disambiguation link notification for April 28An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victor Goldschmidt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Norwegian. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC) John L. Magee (chemist) moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, John L. Magee (chemist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist Thank you for creating Charles T. Prewitt. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Quoc Viet Le moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Quoc Viet Le, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Your submission at Articles for creation: Quoc Viet Le (November 25)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Jürgen Kirschner. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Hannu Oja. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Quoc Viet Le has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 08:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC) Rupert G. Miller moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Rupert G. Miller, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Parzen Prize moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Parzen Prize, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " CS1 error on Founders of statistics
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupert G. Miller has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Hans Elsässer. User:Ibjaja055, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC) GreetingsI see you have been very active in articles about chemists. I tried to write an article about Peter Gill, but it been moved to draft space as Draft:Peter Gill (chemist). Could you take a look at it and perhaps help me to get it accepted? I think the major problem is the lack of direct sources. Some of the links support the text but they are not direct sources. I have been on WP for a long time and I am now getting old and my memory is getting worse. I was an admin but gave it up because of my age. All best wishes. He is noted as a member of the World Association of Theoretical and Computational Chemists. Bduke (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC) Peter GillI have been thinking about this article too, but you are way ahead of me. You might find this link useful: http://watoc.net/watoc.dirac.html WATOC/our-people/academic-staff/p-gill.html and this one https://www.sydney.edu.au/science/about/our-people/academic-staff/p-gill.html. Let me know if you think I can help further. Bduke (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Klein (linguist) has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Adelchi Azzalini has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Stewart Fotheringham questionHello, I saw your move on the page Stewart Fotheringham and just had a quick question. I struggled with naming it originally honestly because of his inconsistent name use, with most publications going by A. Stewart Fotheringham. However, when I was deciding on the original page name I found online sources (of varying quality) for Alexander Stewart Fotheringham, AS Fotheringham, Alexander Fotheringham, and just Stewart Fotheringham, [1]. I decided to be safe and include his full name Alexander Stewart Fotheringham, mentioning he usually goes by A. Stewart Fotheringham in the page. I'm very low confidence on any choice, which is why I included the full name, but I was wondering how you decided his preferred name was Stewart Fotheringham, as most publications at least have an "A" in front of the name. If dropping the Alexander, Wouldn't "A. Stewart Fotheringham" be closer to what it seems he prefers to publish under (such as J. R. R. Tolkien, J. K. Rowling)? Thanks for clarification. Is there a source for his preference besides one being used more regularly? Is there a Wikipolicy or design criteria I can use for future guidance? Without any outside source, I just assumed he might be trying to differentiate himself from other researchers with a similar name, and was using his middle and first initial rather then the conventional first and middle initial to do that. However, I don't know him and am only going off of what I see. Thank you for your help! GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 18:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Peter Szatmari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hospital for Sick Children. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Institute for Molecular Science. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Robert Hastings (ufologist). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Rationale for adding names to Crystallography template?If they have a Nobel, won the Ewald or similar then they clearly belong. However, it is not clear that all the recent names reach this level. I have posted on the template, and also asked IUCr & ACA for comments as I think we should be careful about this. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi VaudevillianScientist. Thank you for your work on Norio Kato. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Ldm1954 (talk) 05:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Autopatrolled granted Hi VaudevillianScientist, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers. Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 22:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
The edit summary field looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → |
