|
User talk:Vanished user sojweiorj34i4f/Archive 5DYK for Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance
Materialscientist (talk) 11:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Cambridge meetup 14 NovemberAnother Cambridge meetup is set for the afternoon of Saturday 14 November. Please contribute to the page and come along if you can. (Essex covers many things, but some of those things are adjacent to Cambridgeshire). Charles Matthews (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Germany's Aims in the First World War A tag has been placed on Germany's Aims in the First World War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Talkback Message added 19:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Stop the Islamisation of DenmarkA tag has been placed on Stop the Islamisation of Denmark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding CfD nomination of Category:Mark HaddonI have nominated Category:Mark Haddon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC) DYK for Germany's Aims in the First World War
Calmer Waters (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
1st Wikiproject UK Politics NewsletterThe first UK Politics newsletter is currently available at WP:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom/Newsletter. All participants of the project have been subscribed to receive copies of the newsletter. You can unsubscribe simply by removing your name from the Subscription list. Regards. Road Wizard (talk) 20:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Englishdefenceleague.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Englishdefenceleague.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Indian rope.jpgThanks for uploading File:Indian rope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
RfA Thanks My RFA →→→
Dear Francium12, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which failed with a final result of (40/19/12). Thank you for your participation in my RfA which I withdrew after concerns of my knowledge of policy. Special thanks are owed to Coffee, who defended me throughout and whom I cannot thank enough for the nomination; to 2over0 for being supportive and helpful; to A Stop at Willoughby for the thorough, thoughtful and articulate support rationale; to IP69.226.103.13 for maintaining composure and for a pleasant interaction on my talk page and, last but not least, to Juliancolton who was good enough to close the RfA at my request and, frankly, because an editor whom I respect so much found the time to support me! If the need for more admins at the main page is still apparent in a few months, I may try again. Thank you all for a relatively drama-free RfA and for providing me with much material from which to learn from my mistakes. You're all welcome to drop by my talk page any time. God save the The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow! Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC) Unreferenced BLPs
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC) Law workThanks for your RfA support; is there any chance you do GAN reviews? I've got a load of law ones that need doing. As an aside, I have a few politics projects that you might be interested in :). Give me a poke if you'd be good with some form of collaboration. Ironholds (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Recent nomination at DYKHi Francium12, I reverted your nomination because you deleted a load of other stuff at the same time. Add it back, but best to use the preview button :-), it's easily done I know. Mikenorton (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, as an autoreviewer, any article you create is automatically marked patrolled. I suggest that this should be taken as an obligation not to create any unsourced stubs, without so much as an external link, as you did for this article. --Crusio (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Content The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Joseph GriecoHello Francium12, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Joseph Grieco, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Blargh29. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " Vanessa PerroncelI see that you removed the proposed deletion from Vanessa Perroncel. Are you intending to improve the article? JACOPLANE • 2010-01-30 12:03 Speedy deletion nomination of Vanessa PerroncelA tag has been placed on Vanessa Perroncel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Articles for deletion nomination of Vanessa PerroncelI have nominated Vanessa Perroncel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Perroncel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. THF (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC) WikiCup 2010 January newsletterWe are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ted HopfA tag has been placed on Ted Hopf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding AfD nomination of Howard FredricsAn article that you have been involved in editing, Howard Fredrics, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Fredrics. Thank you. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Thryduulf (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The "article" had nothing from impartial reliable sources to indicate any kind of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC) I have nominated Five Get Over Excited (The Housemartins song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Get Over Excited (The Housemartins song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC) "war chest" editingYour user page tells me that you
Perhaps this creation of yours is intended as one of the items in the chest. It strikes me as seriously defective work. Here's the first sentence:
First, you present no evidence of any real controversy. Universities are rather routinely (and rightly) criticized for misdeeds. Here it's clear that something went wrong. The BBC and the tabloids Times and Mail were right to report on it. None presented it as a controversy. Moreover, none alleged that the university as a whole was behind it. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't; that's for Private Eye or similar to investigate. All these stories said was that two individual lecturers had encouraged the students to give favorable responses. The stories also made it clear that the university expressed dismay and regret; you or I might think "Well of course, it was caught with its pants down; such crocodile tears are meaningless", but that's for readers or for writers elsewhere to decide for themselves. (Also, if you discount what's said according to its likely motivation, then you'd have to discount any story critical of a university that's published in the poujadist Daily Wail.) Most editors have off days. Certainly I do. I hope that this article was created during one of your off days. Either way, please be rather more careful about this kind of subject in the future. Further, it can't harm to specify the title and date and where known author of any news article cited, if only in anticipation of reorganizations and deletions at news websites. I'm not at all convinced that this "controversy" merits a paragraph within a larger article, let alone an article by itself. But anyway I have revised it. -- Hoary (talk) 04:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
WikiCup 2010 February newsletterRound one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Fatal Englishman novel cover.jpgThanks for uploading File:The Fatal Englishman novel cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE:
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Goldneylogo.JPGThanks for uploading File:Goldneylogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE:
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Law as IntegrityDear Francium12: An article you began, Law as integrity, contains only the following statement:
Could you expand this a little to inform us as to what exactly the theory holds? Thanks. MishaPan (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
WikiCup 2010 March newsletterWe're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC) AfD nomination of Roberta MaleyAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Roberta Maley. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta Maley. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Nigel HastilowI have nominated Nigel Hastilow, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Hastilow. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wintonian (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 The article Mosley v United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Someone filling an application to the European Court of Human Rights is not a notable action. It is not yet known whether there will be a case. [1] Or are there any sources that state otherwise? Many thanks. Mootros (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC) While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing AfD nomination of Mosley v United KingdomAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mosley v United Kingdom. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosley v United Kingdom. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
WikiCup 2010 April newsletterRound two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants Articles for deletion nomination of Manish SoodI have nominated Manish Sood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Sood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mattinbgn\talk 10:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
Articles for deletion nomination of David Icke, the Lizards and the JewsI have nominated David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mel Stride. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC) The article Mel Stride has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC) The article Tom Greatrex has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC) DYK for R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
