User talk:Vahagn Petrosyan

Welcome

Barev Vahagn, yes WikiProject Armenia-its em, yete ognutyan kam inch vor harts unes Wikipediai veraberyal, kashxatem ognel. VartanM 06:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: պ, տ, կ in Armenian

Hello Vahagn, thank you for your message. Actually, պ, տ, կ, ծ, ճ are all ejective sounds in eastern Armenian. Can you show me text that shows otherwise? You can indeed hear the ejective when an eastern Armenian speaks the language (as opposed to Western Armenian which does not contain them). (For example, how else do you think that փ and պ are differentiated in eastern Armenian?) Regards, Serouj (talk) 21:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

փ = [pʰ] is the aspirated version of պ = [p]. Like, say, ց = [t͡sʰ] is the aspirated version of ծ = [t͡s], etc. Listen to this newscast, for example. You won't hear ejective sounds like p’. As concerns a text, this one here says (on page 7) "...throughout this study I concentrate on Standard Eastern Armenian ... primarily because it distinguishes in pronunciation the three consonant series (voiced, voiceless and voiceless aspirated)...". Besides, as a native speaker of Eastern Armenian and Russian I can say that the pronunciation of պ, տ, կ and п, т, к does not differ at all. And you can find plenty of sources confirming that in Russian those are voiceless plosives. I think the reason you suppose Eastern Armenian has ejectives is that Western Armenian does not have voiceless plosives at all and when you hear them in our speech you think those are ejectives, perhaps? --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think your assumption regarding my reasoning is correct. It's good that Russian has the same 3 sounds. So I guess you can confirm this is the case for ծ and ճ? In Western Armenian, only voiceless aspirated and voiced exist, you are correct... Serouj (talk) 22:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that ծ and ճ are not ejectives but Voiceless alveolar affricate and Voiceless postalveolar affricate respectively. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Pronunciation of ռ in Western Armenian

In practice there is no distinction between ր and ռ in Western Armenian (though an attempt is made by teachers of the language to "roll" the ռ, no one in practice does this). It is only Eastern Armenians from Iran who say ր quite distinctly than ռ (they pronounce ր like "red" is pronounced in American English). I don't think Eastern Armenians from Armenia differentiate it much, if at all, and certainly not to the extent that EA speakers from Iran do. Serouj (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarification. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian alphabet

Hi Vahagn. Because you are one of the editor of "Georgian alphabet", pleas look Russian topic about alphabet. There is a lot of Reliable sources about Mesrop Mashtots supplied the Georgian alphabet. Divot (talk) 09:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know the issue well enough to weigh in. I don't think I can help.--Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 10:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New section

Շնորհակալ եմ ջերմ խոսքերի համար, հարգելի Վահագն: Հարգանքներով:--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Չարժի. Keep up the good work. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary

belated thanks for your kind invitation. I will resume using my account when making edits to wikt:, and I'll see where that takes me. Regards, --dab (𒁳) 09:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very glad to hear that. You could warm up by fulfilling requests at wikt:Category:Entries which need Cuneiform script and wikt:Category:Entries which need Old Persian Cuneiform script. Also, given your track record of dealing with nationalism, perhaps you could weigh in in our fierce vote/battle, where we decide whether to treat Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian as separate languages or one Serbo-Croatian (the vote ends August 5). --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will take it slow with joining the fray for now. When I joined Wikipedia back in 2004, I also avoided all conflict at first, trying to get the feel of the place, and made it a habit to only pursue a dispute when I was convinced I was right from the point of view of the project goals, not from my own point of view.

I do not have intimate knowledge of wiktionary's project goals. I feel that the project suffers from lamentable structural defects because there was not enough expertise around when it was shaped, and now it cannot make up its mind what it wants to be. But this isn't my battle. I see the Serbo-Croatian dispute (which I admit was going to come up anyway) as reflecting deeper structural flaws.

briefly, the basic flaw is the underlying idea, born from an undue focus on English in a project that was going to be vastly multilingual, that there should be a page per spelling (i.e., Unicode strings), as opposed to a page per lexeme. This is absurd, of course, and you end up with very large pages combining completely unrelated items, while you have a single item scattered over numerous stub pages. You also end up with a virtual duplication of entire languages that are written in more than one alphabet, as in the case of Serbian. Not to mention the huge mess you will have with any historical language that doesn't have fixed orthography. Sumero-Akkadian is extreme in this respect, but you don't need to look as far. Already compiling a dictionary of Middle French or Middle English based on a "one page per spelling" basis is a nighmare to build, and will also be a nightmare to peruse.

From where the project is now, this is going to be a extremely difficult to fix even if it is ever decided it should be fixed.

if I was paid a month's salary and asked to "please fix it", I would probably opt for something like ISO-639 namespaces. Say, wikt:be would be the main page about the English verb (or alternatively point to wikt:en:be, depending on how much wikt: wants to be an English dictionary "primarily"), a very large page discussing all aspects of this English lexeme and its history, with the Swedish verb at wikt:se:be. wikt:are otoh would itself be a disambiguation page and not contain any discussion of the English word "to be" but point to wikt:en:be directly, besides pointing to other pages on other lexemes. This is just off the top of my head, but it points to what I consider the inescapable conclusion that wiktionary needs to move from being spelling based (Unicode string based) to being lexeme based like any reasonable dictionary.

Incidentially, relying on ISO-639 would result in treating sr (Serbian) and hr (Croatian) as separate by default, simply because endorsing ISO seems to be the most neutral approach. But merging entries on sr and hr lexemes would impose itself on a case-by-case basis, just like most enm (Middle English) entries could reasonably be merged into the main en entries. I base this on my experience at Wikipedia in dealing with very large amounts of of information very heteregenous in scope and detail. Say, as long as we merely mention that been is the Middle English predecessor of to be, wikt:enm:been can simply redirect to wikt:en:be. But if a Middle English scholar should begin to introduce an extensive treatment of the verb in Middle English, the wikt:enm:been article could then be {{split}} off as a standalone entry. The Germanic etymology would be at wikt:gem:bēō to be discussed centrally, so it can be linked from all entries on Germanic cognates. A full dictionary of Indo-European etymology could be placed under the wikt:ine: namespace without interfering in any way with the main namespace, and without the need to resort to awkward "Appendix:" solutions. --dab (𒁳) 11:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duduk page changes

Certain people have changed [1] the duduk page and put Turkish origins, and even removed other visual examples of Gasparyan's links above. Also, the right side where it said "Traditional Armenian Instrument" is removed and added Turkish info. Is there anyway you can help out? They have locked the page.

Can you help out on the Duduk page? They keep reverting Eupator and my edits back to what it was before. They remove the Armenian info and put Turkish. Please help out here. Everybody knows, even non-Armenians that Duduk is Armenian. Specially from the 2000 movie Gladiator by Gasparyan. Monlonet (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry I can’t help. I’m not trained in dolma/duduk wars. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title of "Raffi (poet)" page

I think "Raffi (novelist)" would be best. Diranakir (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too think "Raffi (poet)" is inappropriate. When you think of Raffi, you think of his novels (Խենթը, Կայծեր, Դավիթ Բեկ, Սամվել), not poems. I don't edit Wikipedia very often though and I'm not sure about naming conventions. Raffi (novelist), Raffi (writer), Raffi (author)? --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you agree. Definitely it's his novels. I'm not sure about naming conventions either. I think I'll wait a few days and see if I get any other feedback, then I'll do something. Thanks. Diranakir (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks

		The Original Barnstar
		For fixing my garbled misinformation in Western Armenian language and Eastern Armenian language article. In ictu oculi (talk)

{{Lang-el}}

Hello! Yes, "el" is for Modern Greek, but what links to is just plain "Greek language". And since Artabanes is not specifically "ancient" Greek, but readable and understandable in Greek in general, it is logical IMO to link to the language as a whole. Distinguishing between the periods of the language makes sense only when a specific form is present in only one of them... Constantine ✍ 01:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vahagn Jaan

It seems there is an aversion to even mentioning the very real Iranic nature of the Armenian language - even as a theory. As you can see from the references provided, several notable, unbiased, Western scholars of the Armenian languages concur. I'm not saying it is definitive, but it is absolutely a reasonable hypothesis and should be mentioned with other less applicable theories such as a dubious link to Greek which you seem to want to highlight.

Let's not politicize science and linguistics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyisnotbad (talk • contribs) 17:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, show me one post-1900 author claiming Armenian is an Iranian language. The link to Winfred P. Lehman's work is not Winfred Lehman's work: it's an English translation of Hubschmann's 1875 work, where he proves Armenian is not an Iranian language. The hypothesis that Armenian is an Iranian language, held before 1875, is analogous to Flat Earth model; it should be mentioned in the article treating the history of Armenian linguistics. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anahit

Hi, I have seen that you participated in editing Anahit article. I had written some questions to discuss on the discuassion page of the article. I will be thankful for your opinion published there. Thank you in advance, --Zara-arush (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dighapet

An AE proceeding was launched against User:Dighapet [2]. This may concern you since you were involved in editing articles with his participation. Gorzaim (talk) 00:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary

Crossposted to User_talk:Angr.

I am posting this to you as a wiktionary admin. Wiktionary, where apparently the trolls still hold the admin buttons. Or I am at a loss to explain this [3], and after I restored the vandalised page a block of my account for "Disruptive edits: multiple (dozens, hundred or thousands of edits)". I do not know if this guy was on drugs when he blocked me, or if he genuinely thinks that providing academic literature to discuss the etymology of a word counts as "disruptive" editing.

Apparently an enfant terrible even for wiktionary standards, but I can only hope that this will now be sufficient to get this joker de-adminned in a hurry. We both know he wouldn't last a day on en.wiki with this behaviour.

regards, --dab (𒁳) 09:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gloves was of course wrong to block you, but his behaviour in this case was not typical of him. Usually he is well-wishing and considerate. Oh, and he's bipolar (not joking). Take that into account. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Audemars Piguet logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Audemars Piguet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaghut

Instead getting offended and making unnecessary comments such as "thank you for wasting my time", you could have simply added the sources beforehand. I hope you know that this is an encyclopedia where every statement needs to be sourced. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My response was a response to your response. You should have asked me for sources on my talk page and not reverted me. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Shaumiani) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shaumiani, Vahagn Petrosyan!

Wikipedia editor Wurstmaster just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add citations, like a town website, or a census result for the town (to support the population statistic.)

To reply, leave a comment on Wurstmaster's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaumiani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aram Khachaturian Armenian pronunciation

Would this be correct: Armenian pronunciation: [ɑɾɑm χɑtʃʰɑtɾjɑn] ? If necessary, can you please make the necessary changes? --Երևանցի ^talk 03:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use Armenian pronunciation: [ɑˈɾɑm χɑt͡ʃʰɑt(ə)ɾˈjɑn]. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 07:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Երևանցի ^talk 18:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vahagn Petrosyan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zvartnots

Flights you mentioning are connecting via TBS airport on Monday and Saturday. Note that Armenia Aircompany will have direct flights which will run on Tuesdays and Fridays as per official announcement of airline on their FB page. For your information: Sometimes airline operate flights with intermediate stop, example: Emirates operates flights to Malta via Larnaca or flights to New York via Milan. Wappy2008 (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are no direct Yerevan–Prague tickets available on their armeniafly.com website. I would not put much faith in their "official" announcements. Armenia Aircompany is not a serious enterprise. It has backtracked on many of its official announcements. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wappy2008: For your information, I called the company today. They have cancelled the direct flights to Prague due to "technical" issues. I am removing the destination from the article. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding pronunciation

Good morning, you may be wondering what on earth I was doing with my 'vandalism' edits in Zvartnots International Airport. According evidence in H:IPA#Affricates and double articulation, it is not recommended to put tie bars due to encoding issues. Also, not everyone will know the dialectical differences between Eastern and Western Armenian. Abuse me if you still need to challenge this. Shat shnorhakalutyun! — AWESOME meeos ！ * ([ˈjæb.ə ət məɪ])) 23:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vahagn Petrosyan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mövenpick Hotels & Resorts logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Mövenpick Hotels & Resorts logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vahagn Petrosyan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gitavan

The article Gitavan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I did a search and this does not seem to be a notable word in English

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]