User talk:Ultraexactzz/Archive 7
This archive includes edits to User talk:Ultraexactzz from October 2008 through August 2009. I had withdrawn from editing during much of this period. DeletionUnder other circumstances I'd tell you you have an awesome page. After creating my account and looking through all the myriads of options and pages involved in being a new Wikipedian, part of that is looking at userboxes, and as I don't have my own computer, I simply saved the list of possibilities under hidden comment until I had time to go through them all. So, because I save my work-in-progess on my own page under hidden comment, which nobody is ever going to look at when there's no text on the page, the page was deleted. That is, I noticed the link to my page was red, said to myself "what the hell," and clicked the link which brought up a blank page and a deletion notice. However, I am also confused, because clicking on "RayvnEQ" at the top of the menu bar shows me a page, and when I hit the edit button, it also shows me a list of hidden comment. Yet, the link to my page on my watchlist still appears red. I have no way of knowing whether the list of user boxes under hidden comment when I click "edit" from my menubar is complete. This whole thing is confusing but I need to make sure that 1) my page exists and 2) every userbox I had choosen for consideration to eliminate or keep from my user page when I finish it is kept within the hidden comment. (I do not own a computer, so I cannot keep a notepad file on said non-existent computer.) Also, some of the userboxes were on a hidden comment on the talk page of my name, because I mistakenly put them there, so I need to make sure those are still there as well. (And if so, I will move them to hidden on my actual page.) Please help. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=RayvnEQ ~ Rayvn (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Cat:Language iconsI have nominated Cat:Language icons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC) RfAHi Ultraexactzz! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down, and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 22:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC) HelloJust a question, how is it going with the Recommend phase of the RfA review, specifically when will each person's response be posted as in the anonymous responses. Where will you post them? Thanks Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Thank youI moved the page to Family Online Safety Institute from my userpage. I just wanted to ask if you could double check to make sure it is successfully moved and appears to be working. also, thank you so much for all your patient help/edits with the page. I really appreciate it. Pastadog42 (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC) RfA thanksregarding 79.73.115.236I see you posted, lifting an autoblock. I'd suggest waiting a bit longer next time, or asking the blocking admin. This IP has not been used for anything other than Tom Sayle socks, as far back as CU can see. So there's no reason to lift the block, and no risk of collateral damage. The newest user is yet another sock. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC) ArbCom electionsHi there, I'm writing an article for the Signpost newspaper, and would like to ask you if you could just check my work so far, on the process part of the elections. I've just been in a discussion where someone said questions wouldn't be open until the 17th, and I wasn't aware of that. Since you've been quite active on that talk page, I thought you'd be able to help me and let me know if my work is accurate. Thanks. – How do you turn this on (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC) HiHi Ultraexactzz, pleased to meet you. Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Jat people page. The Jat people page has been under heavy anon vandal attack. The Sikh article (I also worked on the Sikh article last year) was under similar anon heavy vandal attack last year but a administrator semi protected the page indefinitely and us editors were able to create a very nice article. Please can you semi-protect the Jat people indefinitely so we can do similar job of producing a very good article without these constant vandal attacks. Many anon users have been vandalising the article including the following user who keeps on vandalising the article by adding uncited information which is not correct. He has done this on the Kashmiri people article and many others, see his talk page. Here are the separate occasions:
He has been warned and blocked on many occasions but still continues, blocking him has no affect. He just changes ip:
The only long-term solution is a similar one to the one done by an admin on the Sikh article Semi-protect indefinitely this allow users to build a nice article without it being destroyed by anon vandals. Once the vandal disruption is gone someone can ask for un-protection. Please can you help us out here. Thank you.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Thank you about Jat peopleThank you Ultraexactzz, it has helped but if this anon or others come back in 1 months time to vandalise again. We will need your help again and I will make a similar request for help. P.S. The reason why you have these anons vandalising the article is because it is about an ethnic group so similar reasons to why the Jewish people article is protected indefinitely, it is a high risk article for vandalism just like this article. Its a big set of people. It needs to be kept an eye on like the Jewish people article. I will come back to you if in 1 months time it starts up again. Thank you once again.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
RequestCould you proffer some sage advice for a lady at my talk page User_talk:MBisanz#Could_you_be_my_knight_in_shining_armour, much thanks. MBisanz talk 22:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Misdirected soft redirect?From looking at your contribs, where you were redirecting candidate question talk pages to the candidate vote talk pages, I think you might have copied and pasted the wrong link here. I think you meant to direct people to here, not here. If I have that right, would you be able to fix it? Carcharoth (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Look Man or womanLook man or woman quit deleting other people stuff.I put alot of time in trying to develope the WCW Smackdown.So leave my page alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khooks0315 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa--Efe (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC) HelloCan you please add the general questions to Gwen Gale. Thank You 211.30.109.24 (talk) 04:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Election questionsHi - are you a 2008 ArbCom elections officer? I need some help and advice about the way my election questions page is being edited. I assumed that one section is one thread is me and one other editor, rather than a free-for-all forum. For the third time this threading discipline is not being respected. Please advise or refer me to someone else, if you can? Charles Matthews (talk) 14:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Charles's questions pageHi Ultra, thank you for your note. I don't want to seem argumentative for the hell of it, but Charles did post some serious inaccuracies about me, e.g. that I was sending him "nuisance mail," which I wasn't, and that he e-mailed me information about the issue under discussion yesterday, which he didn't. Removing my response allows those inaccuracies to stand uncorrected. I feel that voters should be allowed to read comments and responses and judge for themselves. Does it explicitly say somewhere that threaded discussion is not allowed on questions pages? SlimVirgin talk|edits 19:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Vote statsSee Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008#Vote_stats. Can you help? — Rlevse • Talk • 22:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. CfD nomination of Category:AfD Debates withdrawn by nominatorI have nominated Category:AfD Debates withdrawn by nominator (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 23:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC) Disclaimer editnoticesHi. I see you added editnotices to the disclaimers (MediaWiki:Editnotice-4-General disclaimer, etc). We realized some times ago that only users who are able to edit the page can view the editnotice, and those are fully protected. So we have the choice between rewriting them so that it is addressed to sysops if needed, or deleting them. What do you think ? Cenarium (Talk) 23:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) RequestHey, Ultraexactzz. Some other admins and I are working on a project here that we'd like to work on a bit before we bring it to the wider attention of the community. Would you mind taking a look? Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delivered at 05:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable) Happy Birthday!Willking1979 (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Happy Adminship Anniversary!Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009From the editor — A new leaf
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 08:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator electionThe Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Military history WikiProject coordinator electionThe Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion of User:Andreawestrich/SandboxA tag has been placed on User:Andreawestrich/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please comment on political straw pollsThe article Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election and its associated pages were deleted as of 9 Nov 2008, and the deletions are now being reviewed. Because of your prior involvement, please comment at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election. Thank you for your consideration! 20 involved editors are being notified. JJB 19:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 14:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia