User talk:UNOwenNYC

Welcome!

Hello, UNOwenNYC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Baskerville Hounds. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 78.26 (talk) 03:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for NML Cygni

On 30 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article NML Cygni, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the red supergiant NML Cygni is the largest star currently known, at about 1,650 times the Sun's diameter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NML Cygni. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tethys (moon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enceladus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sleep Tight (Angel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyperion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mozilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mashup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adrienne Corri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Drifters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Junk text being added

Just noticed a few of you edits are adding the junk text "QuickiWiki Look Up" to the bottom of articles. This might be caused by a browser extension or plugin. See for example [1] --Salix (talk): 19:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Dot Corporation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OlYeller21^Talktome 21:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cotswolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. We do not simplify articles like that, your formatting changes are awkward, plus the actual article is called Mobile phone form factor, I've never used the term "style" used in this context ViperSnake151  Talk  14:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Form factor

Hello there! Please, let's discuss the issues with editing out "form factor" as a term. If might be gramatically incorrect, but it is used in many places around Wikipedia and elsewhere — please have a look at articles Computer form factor, Harddrive#Form factors, Disc form factors#Form factors, Form factor (mobile phones), Small form factor etc. Editing it out in one place would just create a confusion, and "configuration" isn't such a great replacement IMHO.

Thoughts? Please, let's discuss. Thank you. -- Dsimic (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Danger Man may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• as Irish in "The Battle of the Cameras") working for a secret British government agency called M9 (analogous to [[Mi6]], though his [[Mid-Atlantic English]] accent persists for the first few

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zhao Ziyang may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Zhao spent four years as a [[Machinist|fitter]] in Hunan, at the Xianzhong Mechanics Factory. [Zhao Wujun, the youngest of his four sons, worked with him (Zhao also had a younger daughter).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changing restrictive relative pronouns "that" to descriptive relative pronoun "which"

Hi, I'm sure you've made the edits to Asynchronous Transfer Mode, DNS spoofing, and Digital subscriber line access multiplexer and a number of others that I aren’t bothered about, in good faith. However, there is a difference between the restrictive and descriptive relative pronouns and the way they should be used. Basically, you need a comma before a descriptive relative pronoun and not before a restrictive one, and many of us, but not all, habitually use “that” for the restrictive and “which” for the descriptive. So your changes, in this regard, look, at least arguably, like a bit of a crusade to reverse that policy, or worse still, vandalism. Fowler's Modern English Usage (pages 634 to 640, in the 2002 reprint of the 1st ed.) should be of some help on this subject.

There may be some merit in the removal of some of the “that”s, as being wordy. But I’m not sorting through those. So I’ve just reverted the edits.

Graham.Fountain | Talk 16:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks, and you're welcome.

Was just thinking about stuff, and I thought, the nearest I ever got to New York New York was seeing the New York Dolls when they played York University : the story at the time was that it wasn't on the schedule, but the band insisted, because they felt there was/should be some connection between York and New York. Must have been sometime in the early-mid 1970s. I'm struggling to remember where abouts it was on campus (slept since then), but think it might've been Derwent Collage Dining hall. But then much of the 70s is fuzzy - if you remember it well, you weren't really there.

Graham.Fountain | Talk 11:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antoinette Bower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fugitive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fall Out (The Prisoner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Many Happy Returns. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Munchos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• retail is now sold - as of 2014 - for $2 [$3.29 in some areas], and .99 for the 4.25 oz. "Big Grab").

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A+E Networks

UNOwenNYC: "Whoever 'fixed' this prior to me, MUST've either come from another planet or hasn't YET been born. Those are the ONLY EXPLANATIONS I can come up with to explain how someone can - in the SAME PARAGRAPH (!?!) in which the name of the WELL- KNOWN channel..."

A+E stands for the A+E Networks (the company) as opposed to the A&E (TV channel) that was also called A&E Network at one point. So, you need to check what you are doing and insult some one for your error and have that same such person come back and correct your mistake. --Spshu (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Warren William may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• He was often described as shy, and one costar - [[Joan Blondell] - went so far as to say; '(he)...was an old man even when he was a young man.'

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting username

Any connection to And Then There Were None? Quis separabit? 18:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Time Machine (1960 film), you may be blocked from editing. Per previous notifications in edit summaries and on IP talk page, the formatting is non-standard and unacceptable. Text should flow in long paragraphs, not be interrupted every sentence or two. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UN Owen

RE: UN Owen: Ooooooh. I am scared. I shouldn't accept any invitations to any remote islands from old acquaintances, I guess. Good one. Are you Ulick Norman or Una Nancy? Yours, Quis separabit? 21:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It took me a minute to figure out what you were getting at. I think it also includes beautiful isolated hotels in the Iranian desert (1974), or mountain-top estates (1965).

Yeah but those were crappy remakes of the original film, which was heavily sanitized anyway. Quis separabit? 21:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You do know what the original title was, I assume. Also - and only because you 'piqued my interest' in seeing 'my films (heh-heh), I'm on YouTube, and they've a few of them, on - including a Russian version (English subs), which several people are saying it's 'the best.'

Not gonna watch it tonight. Every night - after I take my sleeping meds (chronic insomnia), I curl up, and watch an 'off the beaten path' film; tonight, it's Stalker (a Russian film, by the man who made the original Solaris (beats the G. Clooney version by a mile - so, what else is new?) and, then - if I'm still awake, I watch an episode of one of my top 3 fave TV series - Danger Man.

There have been numerous films made. Of course, I know the original title -- it's included in the And Then There Were None article, and why it can never be used again. I actually just used Ten Little Indians in my opening comment to you, "RE: UN Owen:" because it was faster (only three words, instead of five), but in the long run I haven't saved any time anyway. LOL. Quis separabit? 23:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that I left a message regarding this same matter back on August 27, 2014. It's just a couple of messages up. Quis separabit? 23:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taylor Negron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A House Is Not a Home (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, UNOwenNYC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

?

What were this and this? General Ization ^Talk 21:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, UNOwenNYC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

When correcting grammar please check that the change you are making is actually correct. For example on Trent Lehman you changed "hanged", which is correct, to "hung" which is not correct. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carnival of Souls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawaii Five-O (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hydraulic fracturing proppants, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hydraulic fracturing proppants, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, UNOwenNYC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undone edits

Hi, i've undone two of your edits which had put digits instead of spelled out numbers. According to our MOS ~ MOS:NUMERAL ~ we write out numbers under ten and others if they can be written in one or two words. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 13:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to appear to be picking on you, but i have reverted several other of your recent edits for the same reason or because you seem not to understand English grammar quite as well as you think and have introduced errors as you claimed to be fixing the grammar. I am going to stop now, for a bit, because i don't want you to feel persecuted, but i would urge you to take care with what you edit, and not to do so against the MOS or contrary to grammatical practice. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 13:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, UNOwenNYC, i'm afraid i have undone one of your edits. Please take greater care to understand what you are doing and edit correctly. May i suggest you read and understand MOS:NUMERAL which, as i suggested above, defines how we format numbers; what you have been doing is wrong for our purposes. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 06:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dingonek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palaver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

Please consider reading and following the Manual of Style; currently you are breaching many of its recommendations and requirements ~ those which have been put together by the community for the community to follow. I have reverted you, again, at Diane Cilento for this reason. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits and style

Hi UNOwenNYC. I have found again the necessity to change or undo some edits which you have made. Please, can you not read and understand WP:NUMERAL before you change any more numbers, as you clearly are not following its directions. I would also suggest that your grasp of grammar is not as strong as you think, as i have found it necessary to undo several grammatical errors which you have introduced. Finally, may i suggest that you not vent your apparent anger in edit summaries as it doesn't reflect well on you; it's hard to take seriously a user who shouts (ALL CAPS is viewed as shouting) about the inability of some people to write while making errors of their own. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 08:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you persistently make edits such as this when it has been explained to you, repeatedly, that such edits contradict Wikipedia's Manual of Style regarding numbers. @LindsayH: has been extremely patient in outlining and reiterating why your edits are being reverted, yet you continue regardless. This cannot continue. Please ensure that you adhere to long-standing consensus moving forward, regardless of your personal opinion as to which number formatting should be used.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 21:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• If you continue making ALL CAPS edit summaries containing personal attacks, you will be blocked. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment and civility is policy.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 17:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• And you're still purposefully ignoring WP:NUMERAL to change articles to your preferred style against consensus. This, combined with your lack of communication with other editors and your uncivil edit summaries, is unacceptable in a collaborative project.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 16:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Aristarchus (crater) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please do not give an edit summary saying that you are fixing grammar when your change is not a grammatical one. Changing number formats is not grammar. Also, the change did not seem to be an improvement. DanielRigal (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits and edit summaries at Coureur des bois and elsewhere

You recently made a lot of grammtical changes which were in areas that are at most a matter of personal choice. But then in your edit summaries you used that as a basis to go on an unjustified insult binge agaist the people who built the article, in essence claiming that the previous version was so terrible that that insult binge was justified. You also included a rant that the Wikipedia "overseers" should be stopping people without degrees from editing Wikipedia, and that the "overseers" don't have degrees in what's correct and that you do. I noticed that you also did this at other articles. That is rude and uncalled for. You also appeared to conflict with yourself by saying in essence, that the prose was so bad that you suspect that it was copied from a published textbook. (??) North8000 (talk) 11:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. You have been warned that your edit summaries violate WP:CIVIL, and yet you persist on insulting editors, consistently belittling them for violating your own personal perspectives on grammar, prose and numbers. Your views and actions run completely contrary to Wikipedia's founding principles of collaboration and civility. I don't know if a timed block will have any effect, but I certainly hope that when it expires you will be more amenable to following our policies and guidelines.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 22:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poppy Z. Brite

Hi. I reverted your edit to Poppy Z. Brite, because however much you might dislike the list of influences, they were given in a direct quote (you may notice the quotation marks ~ those are used to indicate a quote), so cannot be changed, as otherwise we would be making the speaker say something they hadn't said. Thanks. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

I'm afraid you still don't understand how numbers work, so i have reverted a couple more of your recent edits. Again, i plead with you, please read MOS:NUMERAL and learn how to do numbers here. Thank you. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 17:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi UNOwenNYC,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi UNOwenNYC,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bob's Big Boy: insulting edit summary

I appreciate your efforts to improve the Bob's Big Boy article, and I agree that article shouldn't veer off on the Toluca Lake unit's architect's professional portfolio. The article was originally copied from that unit's web site, which included puffery about the architect, Wayne McAllister. Correcting these problems, the McAllister content became pedantic.

A few edits are also required in the history section of the article.

Having said that – while Wikipedia encourages bold editing, it also expects editors to use a positive, civil, respectful tone in all interactions. WP:CIV, WP:EQ Edit summaries should not be aggressive nor snide. WP:ESDONTS It appears that others have expressed the same or similar concerns to you in the past. I invite you to use the talk page to directly critique the content and grammar, and do so in a pleasant, cooperative manner. Thank you, βox73 (৳alk) 08:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continued editing

I have reverted you on brittle star because you (still!) don't understand how numbers work, in addition your edits created grammatical errors, rather than correcting them as your edit summaries stated. I beg of you, please read some of the links you have been given above, and try to understand that we work as a collaborating community, not in competition with each other. I fear that, if you do not start taking some of these things on board, you will end up with your editing privileges revoked, and that would be a shame. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 10:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Civility is a pillar of Wikipedia

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for the inability to edit civilly or collaboratively. You continue to use edit summaries to insult other editors and completely ignore messages to you that point out that your edits do not follow the style developed by the consensus of the community. I hope this is the last block that will be needed for you to realize you cannot continue belittling and ignoring your fellow editors. I imagine if the issues continue once the block expires the next block will be of an indefinite length of time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi UNOwenNYC,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Numbers under ten are almost always written out in full; i have, therefore, reverted your edit to "Free as a Bird" as you introduced an error. Please feel free to ask if you have any trouble understanding this. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 22:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continued inability to edit in a civil fashion and your complete refusal to address concerns raised by other editors. To be clear, this will be the last timed block; if this continues after the block expires you will likely be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 22:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Compiler

Your recent change to compiler actually made the grammar worse, since your change implied a single type (is or 's) "there is many types. . ." Please don't make ungrammatical changes and label them as 'grammar'. Murray Langton (talk) 21:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

zodiacal

If you consult the Oxford English Dictionary or Collins English Gem Dictionary you will see that 'zodiacal' is indeed a word (the adjective form of 'zodiac'). I note that many other editors have commented on your problems with spelling and/or grammar. Perhaps you could check more carefully before making changes. Murray Langton (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In The Most Holy Trinosophia you objected strongly to 'zodiacal' with the following description of your change:

"Fixed grammar; there's NO SUCH FORM of 'zodiac' as 'zodiacal'. The dearth of grammar, basic spelling, rudimentary English education is RAMPANT in Wikipedia".

Since 'zodiacal' is indeed a word, do you think you should apologise for such an incorrect and rather impolite remark? Murray Langton (talk) 16:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thus

In a number of Wikipedia pages you have rejected the word 'thus' as being archaic. I have consulted 4 different paper dictionaries, plus several online dictionaries, and none of them label 'thus' as archaic. Could you provide some reference(s) to indicate why you think it is archaic? Murray Langton (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 16:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Huey & the Babysitters

I have reverted you at Baby Huey & the Babysitters, because once again you are making ungrammatical or unuseful edits, as i am not the only person to point out. Please, pay attention to what you do, to the many links you have been given which can help with your editing, and follow our style guidelines; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 17:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Eboli

In Thomas Eboli you changed 'two' to '2', despite having been told many times that such changes are not in accordance with the Wikipedia Manual of style, specifically MOS:NUMERAL. Do you actually read your talk page, or do you just carry on regardless? Murray Langton (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo Gambino

In a recent edit to Carlo Gambino you described the changes as 'added links'. But the actual changes were to remove three instances of 'however'. Giving a completely false description of your editing is effectively telling lies. Please refrain. Murray Langton (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the continued inability to edit in a civil fashion and your complete refusal to address concerns raised by other editors. I was clear that if the same behaviour continued after your last block, the next one would be of indefinite duration.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 22:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your email

Your talk page remains available for you to make an appeal, but if the unblock request runs along similar lines to the email you sent (e.g. that the block was arbitrary, that you have a degree and insist on knowing the background of the admins blocking you) the request will be declined outright.-- Ponyo^bons mots 19:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

If you wish to return to editing, you should consider addressing the various matters that folk have brought up on your talk page. So far you appear to have completely ignored any advice or comments. In particular you need to show that you have taken that advice to heart.

Having a degree merely indicates that you may have some expert knowledge in some particular field, but are on a par with others outside that field. Would you care to enlighten us as to what your degree is in? From your editing it is fairly clear that you are not an expert in spelling or grammar, even though you seem to think so. See Dunning–Kruger effect. P.S. I have four degrees myself, as does my brother. Murray Langton (talk) 17:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]