User talk:Tylototriton/archive1

Monotropoideae

Thanks for creating a page on this topic! Coincidentally, I just finished a lengthy and heavily-researched term paper on the Monotropoideae, which I'm using as the basis for a large expansion of this article, perhaps up to Feature Article status. I've just done the first revision of the article (though I still need to add more citations), and plan on expanding the article section by section over the next several months. Your input is always valued. Cheers! Peter G Werner (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should also add, I'd be happy to help with the Russulaceae article you're working on. I can provide micrographs of additional features, if you're interested. Peter G Werner (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this sounds good! The main thing I'm interested in regarding Monotropoideae is their mycorrhiza, so I'll be happy to contribute if possible/necessary. Photos of microscopical features of Russulaceae would be very appreciated! Pictures e.g. of the sulfoaldehyde reaction, and sphaerocytes would be great! There's nothing yet on Commons as far as I've seen... Tylototriton (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sphaerocyst images would be easy to do - practically any Russula or Lactarius I find will be full of them, and where I live, those are everywhere at this time of year. I'll make a point of creating sphaerocyst images sometime in January, when I get back to my lab. Sulfoaldehyde reaction, probably not - it's a fairly hazardous reaction, at least in the variations I've read, involving concentrated sulfuric acid, hence, it's not something I use. I'll read about it again and see if there aren't safer protocols for it. Peter G Werner (talk) 00:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just to let you know, I've nominated the Monotropoideae article for a "Did you know...?" entry. A link to the nomination and also discussion of expansion of this article can be found at Talk:Monotropoideae. I also considered nominating the Russulaceae article, but found that it didn't meet the criteria, which is that the article is either newly-created, expanded to 5X the previous length within the last week (as I've done with Monotropoideae), or was recently elevated to Good Article status. The Russulaceae article was expanded by about 3.5X, over a week ago, but I think this article will reach GA soon, and it could be nominated then. (One can self-nominate an article.) Peter G Werner (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cryptic species complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybridization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Monotropoideae

On 20 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monotropoideae, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the non-photosynthetic plants of the subfamily Monotropoideae (pictured) depend on both mycorrhizal fungi for food and bumblebees for pollination? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monotropoideae. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 03:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Russulaceae

The article Russulaceae you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Russulaceae for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gug01 -- Gug01 (talk) 23:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Species complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Species complex, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wilt and Grex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of endophytes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saprophytes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Species complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life history. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balkan-Anatolian crested newt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genetic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russulaceae

I'm helping to write up the Signpost's featured content section this week. Can you answer a couple questions for me? What makes Russulaceae have "considerable ecological importance," as you say in the nomination? Is it the same reason why it is well-known in the mushroom community? Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 22:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @The ed17: Russulaceae are ecologically important because they are one of the major groups of ectomycorrhizal fungi worldwide, and thus are significant for plant nutrition and mineral cycling. The reason they are well-known in the mushroom community is not this, however, but their diversity, the often bright colours, and easy identification (as family, that is – identification of species is often quite hard). Hope that helped. Tylototriton (talk) 08:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 08:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Syntopy) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Syntopy, Tylototriton!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I think this subject might best be discussed as a section within the closely-related Sympatry article, for improved context and less click-burden to readers. Should the content expand beyond mere definition and examples, it can be then be split.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Great work on Species complex

Just wanted to say thanks for your work on Species complex. It can sometimes be difficult to tie-up various closely related stubs, and you've done a great job on tailoring an article that is both comprehensive and consolidated. Just like taxonomic revisions, sometimes a flock of articles need a good systematic review and revised organization. Keep up the good work! --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Triturus carnifex courtship display.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Triturus carnifex courtship display.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danube crested newt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybridisation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danube crested newt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danube crested newt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy of Liliaceae

Are you by any chance using 31.36.8.101 as a sockpuppet - or maybe just were not logged on? It looks like that IP was editing the page. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 02:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't logged on. So much for mindfulness and privacy ;) Tylototriton (talk) 06:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue this on the talk page for the article --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision now complete--Michael Goodyear (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Goodyear: Cool, I'll have a look at it, but give me a while, I'm a little busy at the moment.

@Tylototriton: I wondered if you have had a chance to have another look at this, since it has been a month now. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Goodyear: Hi, sorry, didn't come around to do it yet, and I saw you made quite a lot of edits so I would like to take the time to have a thorough look. I'll try to do it this weekend! Tylototriton (talk) 08:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danube crested newt

The article Danube crested newt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Danube crested newt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy of Liliaceae

Hey, I noticed there was a note at WP:Good_article_nominations#Biology_and_medicine under Taxonomy of Liliaceae about that review. So I just thought I'd check in with you. Are you going to be able to finish the review? Peace, delldot ∇. 16:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I know I'm running behind and it's on my list. I'll try to do that next weekend! Tylototriton (talk) 08:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ampelodesmos

added a link pointing to Tutin

Brylkinieae

added a link pointing to Tateoka

List of Poaceae genera

added a link pointing to Weeds

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cynodonteae) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cynodonteae, Tylototriton!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Had a look around and added a few more citations - hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Tylototriton, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Earwig ^talk 23:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Paspaleae) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Paspaleae, Tylototriton!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be helpful to specify time frames rather than ambiguous temporal terms like "used to" and "following". Also, while I'm not well versed in plant genetics, might it be simpler to state "10 chromosomes" or "10 chromosome pairs"? (WP:MTAU).

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andropogoneae

added links pointing to Eulalia, Vossia and Euclasta

Paniceae

added links pointing to Spinifex and Trachys

Stipeae

added a link pointing to Patis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Triturus

I interspersed a few comments at the FAC on Triturus.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  11:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your comments, thanks! The article was promoted in the meantime, but I adopted one of your punctuation suggestions. Tylototriton (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flora of Madagascar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anatolian crested newt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genetic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Anatolian crested newt

Hello! Your submission of Anatolian crested newt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Simon Burchell (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anatolian crested newt

On 20 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anatolian crested newt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Anatolian crested newt is a cryptic species, only shown to be distinct by genetic analysis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anatolian crested newt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Anatolian crested newt), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Sartidia perrieri

Hello! Your submission of Sartidia perrieri at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sartidia perrieri

On 21 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sartidia perrieri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the DNA of Sartidia perrieri's only known herbarium specimen was successfully sequenced 100 years after its collection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sartidia perrieri. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sartidia perrieri), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 6, 2016

Hi, your article has been selected for the Main Page, and I'm working on the TFA text now. - Dank (push to talk) 19:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Tylototriton. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

fungi and other creatures

Thank you for quality articles on biological and ecological topics, based on scientific studies, such as Triturus and Russulaceae, for "I see a certain beauty in well-structured, accessible information", - danke, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Wow, thanks! Tylototriton (talk) 06:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1473 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uapaca bojeri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Species epithet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Madagascar dry deciduous forests page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Madagascar succulent woodlands

Hello! Your submission of Madagascar succulent woodlands at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Notecardforfree (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tylototriton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Madagascar succulent woodlands

On 23 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Madagascar succulent woodlands, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Madagascar succulent woodlands (pictured) are home to the world's smallest primate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Madagascar succulent woodlands. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Madagascar succulent woodlands), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Réunion National Park

Hi, I wanted to review this article for GA but saw you haven't been active in a few weeks. Ping me and I'll be more than happy to review it if I haven't jumped to anything new. If I'm writing a draft, I would just finish it before jumping to your review. Let me know in the next few days! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 06:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Réunion National Park

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Réunion National Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Réunion National Park

The article Réunion National Park you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Réunion National Park for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article barnstar

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Congratulations for getting Réunion National Park to Good Article status! It was a very interesting article — makes me want to go visit! Cheers, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 18:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Réunion National Park

The article Réunion National Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Réunion National Park for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Réunion National Park

On 29 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Réunion National Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Réunion National Park (pictured) could become the first French national park to lose its status? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Réunion National Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Réunion National Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tylototriton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]