Hello Tvlover96, I would like to thank you for your contributions to a Grey's Anatomy-related article. Since it appears you are interested in this topic, I would like to personally invite you to join WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! This project consists of a group of users, collaborating to make articles related to Grey's Anatomy better. Our primary goal is to get as many articles as we can promoted to good and featured statuses, by developing articles, and revertingvandalism. We would be extraordinarily pleased if you decided to join our WikiProject, and help make a difference. If you are interested, all you have to do is add this code: [[Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants]], to your user page, and you are officially a member. If you are having trouble joining, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Again, thank you for your help, and I hope to see you as a member of the project soon! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)00:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. First of all, we would like to welcome three new members to the project: M.Mario, Tvlover96, and Mattom123; we look forward to collaborating with them. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is now a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! Feel free to leave comments or voice your opinions here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are in the preparations for FAC. An administrative board has been added to the project, to make sure the internal processes run smoothly. Any member has the chance to join, and further information is given at the project page. Currently, however, all the positions are filled, so if you are interested, please contact the coordinator and you will be placed on a waiting list. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:
Tasks and Gudelines
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
Character Pages
Ensure that each character page has this section order:
Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines".
Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
General
Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, an extent of last week's, is to develop a Grey's Anatomy-related stub or start-class article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy page with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to fix MOS inconsistencies, copyedit, add more information by researching, and remove unreferenced claims! Barnstars will be awarded to users who destub/de-start their articles, and get the quality level promoted to at least 'C' class! You can determine if an article meets the 'C' class criteria by asking a member of the project's administrative board to review the article. Please do not change the article's quality rating yourself; you must have it reviewed by a member of the committee. A list of stub and start class Grey's Anatomy articles can be found at the project's main page. Take part in this initiative, have fun destubbing/starting articles, feel proud after the article you cleaned up looks better, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
List of GA episodes
Hi, I have removed the crossover table from List of Grey's Anatomy episodes. I have removed it because the Grey's Anatomy episodes which crossed over are mentioned at the seasonal articles, and their name is listed in the regular list. The Private Practice episodes shouldn't even be there, because it is not a Private Practice episode list. Comprehensiveness is the goal, but the table was unnecessary. In the future, it is best to discuss drastic changes on the article's talk page before proceeding—especially when the article is an FLC. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)20:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is still a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! If uninvolved with the list, we urge you to leave comments, review the article, and support or oppose it here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are also still in the preparations for FAC, while List of Grey's Anatomy cast members is being developed by TRLIJC19. "Losing My Religion" is now a GAN; it was developed by Sofffie7 and copyedited by TRLIJC19. There is currently a discussion awaiting feedback here; please provide your input there. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:
Tasks and Gudelines
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
Character Pages
Ensure that each character page has this section order:
Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines".
Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
General
Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to create a non-existent/redirect Grey's Anatomy episode article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy episode article with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to research information, copyedit, remove unreferenced claims, and add pictures! Barnstars will be awarded to any user who creates a well-sourced article, that has a quality of at least 'start'! To determine the quality, ask a member of the administrative board to review your article; please do not change the article's quality yourself. Take part in this initiative, have fun creating an article, feel proud after the article you created is existent, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
Hi, I've reverted your edits to List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, because per MOS:DTT, tables have to have titular text on the top, and per the FLC, the columns should be standardized. Please do not revert the article back, and in the future, please refer to the page history before making edits, because I explained why it was changed in my edit summary. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)19:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
Character Pages
Ensure that each character page has this section order:
Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines".
Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
General
Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
Character Pages
Ensure that each character page has this section order:
Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines".
Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
General
Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, a repeat of last time, is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
The premiere was actually pretty good, I've been watching Grey's long enough to know that Arizona wasn't dead, but I still love the show. The way that Mark exited the show was pretty good, and how we finally found out what happened to Arizona was amazing. Though I'm not happy with April coming back, I just generally don't like her character. What'd you think of it? User:Tvlover96 (User talk:Tvlover96)20:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I too knew that Arizona was alive. I've been watching since the show premiered, so it's pretty obvious. I liked the way Mark left, but I was sad to see him go. Did you see this? Apparently Mark was going to run off with Addison, but that was scrapped. I actually would've liked that idea. I too was mad to see April come back. I seriously despise her character, and find her presence annoying. E! Online revealed today that Dane was forced to leave for budgetary reasons. How Shonda decided to fire Dane instead of Drew (Kepner) is beyond me. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)20:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see that, thanks for sharing. It's sad how Private Practice and Grey's have both had to go through budget cuts this year that have made them lose a character, although I do think that it was time for Mark's character to move on, now if Lexie were still alive I think they probably would've fired April instead. I don't know what it is about April I just don't like her, though the story line that Grey's is taking with Arizona loosing her leg is going to pretty interesting, I can't wait for that.Tvlover96 (User talk:Tvlover96)22:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
October 2012
Your addition to Vegas (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from IMDb and TV Guide. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2262383/episodeshttp://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/vegas/videos/375664Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Once Upon a Time (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wraith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
When citing sources, please try to avoid adding bare urls, as they are prone to link-rot. We actually have a cleanup tag, {{Cleanup-link rot}}, to use on articles where bare urls are added. When you add bare urls, somebody else either has to add the tag, or complete the citation for you. There are plenty of citation tags, such as {{cite web}}, {{cite news}} etc that make it easy to format fully formed citations and, where there are a lot of bare urls in an article, WP:REFLINKS will do 90% of the work for you. A few days ago, you undid one of my edits and added some sources for the previously unsourced data, which is good, but when you did so, you added two identical references, which should be avoided.[1] Where references are used more than once, it's simply a matter of entering the reference once, giving it a name, and then using only the reference name in subsequent uses. For example, the following fully formed reference is used in the first instance:
<ref name=tfc>{{cite web|url=http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch.aspx?id=ncis_los_angeles&view=listings|title=Shows A-Z - ncis: los angeles on cbs|publisher=the Futon Critic|accessdate=August 6, 2012}}</ref>
If the reference is used again, it's simply a matter of adding "<ref name=tfc />" instead of the whole reference.
Where possible, please try to use specific references. For example, in television articles a link to the actual episode entry,[2] is better than a link to the entire episode list,[3] as the episode entry provides additional detail to the title, episode number and air date, such as writers, directors, guest stars and plot information. The fix to your reversion at NCIS (season 10) used specific entries, rather than the generic, duplicated url that you added, as well as moving the references into the RTitle field.[4] (References are not part of the episode title so should not be in the Title field, as they then appear as "Title[1]" instead of "Title"[1].)
Replacing fully formed, specific references with generic episode list bare urls, as you did here is inappropriate, adn should be avoided at all costs. The reference that you changed supports the writer and director information, while the bare url that you replaced it with does not. It is essential that replacement references support the same claims that the original reference did not.
Hello, Tvlover96. You have new messages at Talk:Malibu Country. Message added 03:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello! Thanks for your changes to Body of Proof articles. Why did you change the characters part of the season one? Also, two more points, you when doing the ratings deleted the English ones, or are you getting round to doing them? Also, you have no reference for Letting Go? This is because it aired on a Sunday, out of it's normal timeslot! Hope I helped! — M.Mario (T/C) 20:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Letting Go didn't appear in the top 25 for the week that it aired, so it is kind of pointless to add the exact same reference there, don't you think? and yes i'm getting around to the English ones, it's a very time consuming task. And sorry, I meant to revert that edit, guess I forgot! --Tvlover96 (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh that's why! You know in the column where it just says Tuesday, should that not be changed then? And I must thank you very much, this show does get forgotten! Thanks! — M.Mario (T/C) 20:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't even think about that, I'll fix that right now! Yeah that show does get forgotten, I'm ready for the new season to start! --Tvlover96 (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That looks amazing! Let me know if you need any help with it! and with Private Practice ending, which is sad, Body of Proof will probably move back to it's regular time slot, and we'll probably see it in February, which is exciting! --Tvlover96 (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! PP was not my favourite show, but then again, nor is GG. I only watched it to see Kate (in both programmes) and Miranda, seeing as the first had left both shows, it may look like GG will lose a viewer! :D Body Of Proof is great, Delany is great in her role. Valley was great in Human Target, so hopefully will give the show the boost it needs! And I hope Mouser is downgraded to recurring status again! — M.Mario (T/C) 20:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope Valley coming on can bring some more viewers to show to save it, it stinks that we lost 3 characters because of budget cuts and what not, I would've like to see Sonja stay, and with them releasing that Nicholas left the show that just shows that he's going to die, I wish they had kept that more under wraps. Yeah I feel the same way, she was good as a recurring, but her as a main character screws every up. --Tvlover96 (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I like Sonja! But I can see she was a weak part of the cast. The show's got Ethan and Curtis, who are great! Kate is a good character, it's is just her storyline with Megan was a bit pathetic. Now that, that is over it will be great to see Megan's reactions to Peter's death. I hope Nordling does not appear as often, but I hope Joanna Cassidy appears more! I think the upcoming recurring cast they have got looks good, Burgi and Wersching. Nathallie Kelly was a bit annonying in the previous series, I think the show just got to "loved up". — M.Mario (T/C) 21:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Nordling is going to appear in the show much really anymore, with his commitments to a few different shows. Yeah, you cant tell that ABC has pumped a lot into the show this year to see if it will help the ratings, which is good because it means that they care! Oh, I'm with you with Joanna Cassidy, I like her character --Tvlover96 (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do hope the show does well this season. I think the new cast members will be good, and I hope the show will return more to what is was like in the first season, introducing characters, complicated relationships, humour, good guest actors, and less Mouser. — M.Mario (T/C) 21:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cougar Town s3 promo poster.jpg
I've reverted your upload to File:Cougar Town s3 promo poster.jpg. The fair use rationale refers to the original poster, not the file that you uploaded today. This breaches our non-free content policy. Since the filename clearly identifies the file as being that of a poster, an image of a DVD cover should not be uploaded under that filename. Please feel free to upload the image using an appropriate filename (I'd recommend File:Cougar Town season 3 DVD.jpg to be consistent with the images used in the season 1 & 2 articles) with an appropriate fair-use rationale. --AussieLegend (✉)06:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Section headings
Please note that Wikipedia uses sentence case in headings, ie "Cast and characters", not "Cast and characters", "DVD special features", not "DVD Special Features" etc. --AussieLegend (✉)17:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You might also care to check out MOS:YEAR, which says "A closing CE or AD year is normally written with two digits (1881–86) unless it is in a different century from that of the opening year, in which case the full closing year is given (1881–1986)." --AussieLegend (✉)18:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grey's Anatomy (season 9), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Sloan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Orphaned non-free media (File:SusanDelfinoSeason8.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:SusanDelfinoSeason8.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ShondaLand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Walsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, Tvlover96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Tvlover96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Tvlover96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, just letting you that before someone else does, I'm going to revert your edit just because the draft for the tour Draft:Meaning of Life Tour has to be submitted for review first then see if WP:AFC accepts it before it can go back to mainspace (eye roll). I did the same as you a couple of months ago and oh Lord it was a big rigmarole lol. I'll go ahead and sumbit the draft since the tour does start next week, though I have read that it could take up to five weeks for it to be reviewed because there are so many sumbitions. If it was up to me I wouldn't revert it but since a have feeling somebody will I would rather it be me to do it. Hopefully it won't take five weeks to review and will be accepted. HappyAppy10 (talk) 01:11, January 15, 2019 (UTC)
Note
In regard to this edit, you need to remember to update the source's access date, otherwise, the edit is invalid, as the date in access date did not have said-information. Also, please remember to also use an edit summary when editing, as well. livelikemusictalk!23:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
){kind=link}