User talk:Turgidson

Joan Birman

Please clarify why you removed Category: Barnard College alumni. It seems that there is support for this cat in the article. You can respond on the article TalkPage if you like. Thanks. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Turgidson, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit and improvements for article. Thanks you. 58.187.77.36 (talk) 09:48, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Macaulay2

Thanks for voicing an opinion on the Macaulay2/Macaulay merge, and thanks for adding the sentence about packages. I moved that sentence up to the top section, where it seemed to go better than in History, and wrote the wrong thing in the edit summary ('contributors' should be 'packages). David Eisenbud I think should go under history, since he wasn't originally listed as a main developer, but now is. Anyway, I hope you aren't offended that I moved your sentence (or confused by my summary). I'm certainly not trying to violate [WP:OWN], and it goes without saying that you should make any other changes that you think are appropriate.

Related to the same article, do you think it was correct to upgrade the article rating to Start? (I'm not sure what the etiquette is for articles covered by a project with no formal rating policy.) Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • No problem, it looks better this way! I think the rating of "Start" seems appropriate now, though I'm not sure what the formal rating procedure is, either. I would also argue that the M2 article should be of mid-level importance, rather than low-level importance, as it is presently rated. But the case for such a rating may have to be enhanced further, e.g., by highlighting the sheer number of associated packages and contributors, the (relatively) large number of users, the continued NSF support, and the significant number of publications that quote M2 as an indispensable research/computational tool in the area. Turgidson (talk) 15:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last questions

I do not know what it means to be an admin, and what it means to be a volunteer, but I went through hell to get someone to repair the damage on my biography page -- which was made by some troll whom they blocked 18 months ago, and who had an agenda against me, raising phony doubts. They simply went on in his track, pretended "verification" and "self-promotion", but would not make any search, leaving the page as it looked, damaged. I had to get really angry to get to talk to some halfways mature people: they did the repair, but of course, like in police, covered their younger colleagues. Briefly -- I remained quite disapointed of this environment, so I wanted to ask you: who is allowed to do what, and is there no practical way to get in touch directly with a mature and responsible person, when all kind of button-players seem to miss the point, but enjoy sending you to read all of the unrelated policies? Briefly: is there some escalation line, help line or similar, how does one get competent attitude, in this world? I would be grateful for some simple hints. Thanks!

PMPredaMi (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC) (Continuation of : Hello, Mr Turgidson,[reply]

I contact you since I have seen you are one of the last having done something on my Wiki page, which has been totally messed up. I do not know who is responsible for the vandalism, nore when this vandalism happened, since I do not visit often my own Wiki page; I do not even know if there is anyone responsible, and I would like indeed to know. I wish my page to be restaured to its normal state which it has since 15 years, and vandalism be blocked somehow. Or if nobody is responsible for blocking vandalism, let me know.

Hoping you can help me find an answer, I thank you in advance


Preda Mihailescu — Preceding unsigned comment added by PredaMi (talk • contribs) 21:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi again -- Sorry, I do not know how to let you know I talk to you, other than writing here. My page was a normal functional one, with a picture and normal text, for 15 years. Now someone signaled me, it is a wreck -- and I see that there was a troll Skywalker or so, who boycotted it, and he was then removed, but the page was never restored. What the huck of an organisation is this. When it come to censoring a contribution which says things someone does not love to hear, Wiki immediately reacts. But when it comes to restore after vandalism, nobody around... Is it not possible to restore back to the FUNCTIONING condition before Skywalker jumped it? I talked to you, since my gut feeling was right -- at least you are a mathematician, I do not know what function you have here or so. So if your are not the right person, do not take it wrong - I simply want my personal page restored in a decent condition, how it has been around for 15 years. No restore facility around? Or did he succeed to destroy the backlog file?

Happy you liked the Catalan talk -- you should come to China, there I give in March talks on recent work :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PredaMi (talk • contribs) 20:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC) )[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mediaș, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Șeica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of senior Securitate officers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lipova (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ion Ioanid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Văcărești (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

no longer needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.76.36.190 (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:POZA CNC.jpg

Notice

The file File:POZA CNC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ion Jalea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian National Opera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fortifications of Bucharest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki portal

Hello Turgidson, can you please update the Portal:Romania section. There are some articles in there which are not related to Romania. Make it similar like Portal:Italy. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.15.89.44 (talk) 11:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please upgrade that section see — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F08:46FF:FFFF:0:0:50F:E349 (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Theodor Burghele

Notice

The article Theodor Burghele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ugbedeg (talk) 06:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Turgidson

Thank you for creating Theodor Burghele.

User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Is this a partial translation of the ro.wiki page? If so, please add {{Translated page}} on the talk page to provide attribution.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Spicy (talk) 08:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bright Light (CIA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidency of George Bush.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raymond Ibrahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dej, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Făgăraș, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racovița.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you for helping me with The Hatchet. Editoneer (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Ghimbav

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Ghimbav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kiengir

Hi! Go on, mate, and remove all of his irrendentist material from all the Romanian towns! Romania was not in the Kingdom of Hungary, but in the Habsburg Empire. Except some years. Kiengir is out from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3712:3800:EDFE:8205:CA51:4457 (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AE

AFAIK you're not an admin, you should move your comments to the appropriate section.Anonimu (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Turgidson. You suppose to bring some diffs to prove your assertions on AE. Without them, no one will pay attention, or even worse, your comments may be interpreted as an WP:NPA problem. My very best wishes (talk) 23:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for your excellent work on the biography of Ioan Petru Culianu. Viriditas (talk) 11:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mariana Nicolesco

On 18 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mariana Nicolesco, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:POZA CNC.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POZA CNC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

Hi! But I didn't see any medal. It's ok, just hoping the users will replace photos of 2007 with some newer. Many have changed. .karellian-24 (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Turgidson. Thank you for your work on Târgșor Prison. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks for the kind note. Much appreciated. Turgidson (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Rapid București, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ionuț Rada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why colon?

Hi. I noticed that you changed a few <math>f: X \to Y</math> to <math>f\colon X \to Y</math>. There does not seem to be any point in doing so. Can you explain your reasoning here? PatrickR2 (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I always use \colon (in latex, or in math mode on wikipedia) to denote functions such as The reason is that this provides the "right" amount of spacing between the function f and the domain X (i.e., a tiny bit closer to f than to X), as opposed to the usual : used in normal punctuation, or sometimes in math mode, as in a set delimiter, such as , where : (or the alternative, \mid) uses equal spacing on both sides. I hope this answers your question, but if need be, I can try to dig out a reference where this is explained (I'm sure I learned this tex rule a long time ago from a good source, but I forget right now which one). Turgidson (talk) 03:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. I have to admit that I never paid attention to this difference between and . I see now that there is one, but it never bothered me before and still doesn't. I would venture that the number of people bothered by the first version here is an extremely small minority. It does not seem enough to merit these edits, in my opinion. But I see where you are coming from. PatrickR2 (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And actually it could even be debatable which version is "better". PatrickR2 (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the format recommended by the American Mathematical Society, according to their Short Math Guide for LATEX (page 12): "Note 1. The : by itself produces a colon with class-3 (relation) spacing. The command \colon produces special spacing for use in constructions such as " Turgidson (talk) 11:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juliana Geran Pilon

Notice

The article Juliana Geran Pilon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References are all connected to the subject of the article. No evidence of independent notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apocheir (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Romania location

Hello, can you help us revert the changes made to Romania's geographical position which indicate the crossroads version including the given sources, the account that kept charging was banned for sockpuppetry

Thank you Andymxm (talk) 13:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gas field articles

Thanks for your work on these!

FYI, I have made a summary list of articles and their proposed deletion status at User:A. B./Sandbox2. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 05:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the words of encouragement; I can certainly use some in the face of the relentless deletion juggernaut I am confronted with, one that can never be satisfied, no matter how many pertinent facts and references I adduce. And that's not an easy task, given the rather esoteric nature of the subject, and also because I do not have an infinite amount of time to deal with this. Turgidson (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you're satisfied with the references, just remove the proposed deletion tag. See WP:PROD#Objecting. At that point, deletion can only occur at AfD where other editors can evaluate your sources.
Also, a few days ago, I added some references to the bottom of List of natural gas fields in Romania - perhaps they can help some of these fields. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 05:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the advice. I will look at those added references, but not right now, I'm out of gas. :-) Turgidson (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the work you've done!
I've updated User:A. B./Sandbox2 to reflect the latest changes including recent additional proposed deletions. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 07:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Turgidson. Thank you for your work on Mamu gas field. User:Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article, which I've reviewed, as the sources you've added seem fine to me. I was sorry to see from the above that you've been having deletion problems - it seems to be the flavour of the times, unfortunately. Nil carborundum.

Ingratis (talk) 10:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the kind words. OK, keep on truckin'. Turgidson (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CS_Dinamo_Bucure%C8%99ti_(basketball)

if you see soon, just by clicking few names shows roster section is outdated, appreciate if can help. sadly some pages arent checked often so users do as pleased 93.138.234.163 (talk) 15:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Turgidson!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jim Simons

On 13 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Simons, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for helping to improve the article on Adriana Georgescu-Cosmovici, much appreciated!

GnocchiFan (talk) 07:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP

That does happen once in a while. Your options would be to (a) revert the edit yourself and then redo it if it's that important, (b) just make another minor edit to the article so that you can use "Prior edit was by me but the system logged me out by accident" or something like that as your edit summary, or (c) just let it go as not the end of the world. But it isn't really the kind of thing that would be a major priority for an administrator to step in and delete the prior edit — that's a thing we can do in extreme circumstances (like when an edit contains extreme BLP violations or tries to dox the home address and phone number of an individual), but not a thing an administrator would normally be authorized to do in a minor-inconvenience situation that you have other alternatives to resolve yourself. Bearcat (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]