User talk:Tuckerj1976

Indef blocked

You have been indef'd block as a sock. See your user page. Your block log instructs admins not to unblock without contacting arbcom. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admonishment

Dear 7thdr/Tucker1976/et al.,

There are several upright paths available from here. First, you could realize that your participation in Wikipedia has not followed accepted norms, then apologize and ask the ArbCom or the community for a second chance. Second, you could go work on one of Wikipedia's sister projects, such as Wikiquote or Simple English, and demonstrate you can work well in those environments before coming back and asking for a second chance. Third, you can simply stay away from Wikipedia and find other ways of expressing your views.

I urge you to choose one of those, or something like them, rather than adopting a fresh identity and returning surreptitiously. Sock puppetry is not an acceptable alternative.

  Will Beback  talk  09

58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

The advice is much appreciated, however, there is the issue that I am not the 7thdr, although I know them very well. Oddly this is the second time I have been banned as the 7thdr although I am not (The 7thdr has been editing happily on WIKI for some time since the last ban but keeps well away from certain articles). It would appear that having a similar IP address is only not a doubt if one lives in certain states in the USA. But good luck with your editing and thank you for your kind words. Tucker ^talk 09:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification motion

A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scottish-Opera logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scottish-Opera logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]