User talk:TruthGuardians

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 15:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Veracity of....AfD

I noticed your constructive comment at the AfD:

• "...I can see why WP:OR and WP:SYNTH may be a concern, but ultimately I don't see a violation but will admit that perhaps a future edit or two could change that."

That observation deserves to be heard and acted upon. Can you name precisely what in the article raised those concerns? If you will do that, then I'd love to take a crack at improving the article to meet those concerns. Few of our articles are perfect, and sharp eyes serve us well when they lead to improvement. -- BullRangifer (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My main concerns were in the “Economy” section which at first glance looked as though the paraphrasing of the sources were strong enough when in fact with a more carefully I looked at it and compared and contrast the content from the sourced material. Another concern was in the “Fact Checking Trump section, but realize now after careful review that it was only long quotes that gave the appearance of WP:OR. I officially retract my statement, "...I can see why WP:OR and WP:SYNTH may be a concern...” TruthGuardians (talk) 21:14, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for the reply. -- BullRangifer (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michael Jackson: The Magic and the Madness

FYI, since you are interested in the topic, I have started a draft on the J. Randy Taraborrelli book Michael Jackson: The Magic and the Madness (and its later re-releases). Cheers! BD2412 T 04:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the heads up. I’m finishing up the newest edition now. TruthGuardians (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now live, if you want to have a look and possibly expand. Cheers! BD2412 T 15:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for heads up. TruthGuardians (talk) 21:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rocky Kramer

Hello @TruthGuardians:. You've tagged an article I've created as being created for payment. I have not solicited or received payment. I have an interest in music. Ear-phone (talk) 19:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TruthGuardians. I am a fan of rock artists, particularly metal guitarists. I noticed that a new article pertaining to Rocky Kramer popped up and as soon as I began looking it over, you marked it with a suspected WP:UPE violation and moved it to a draft. I left a message on the article's talk page, but wanted to contact you directly as well. The article appears accurate to me, but I don't know why you think it may have been written by a paid writer. Articles have to start with someone. You've undoubtedly started some articles yourself, but that doesn't mean the editor was paid. Do you have anything to support your assumption? If not, can I work on it and hopefully take it out of draft status? If you think there's something wrong with the article, will you work with me to get the article in proper format? I thought about writing an article about this artist myself, so I am interested in helping. Cheers! --Warriorboy85 (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of FBI files on Michael Jackson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article FBI files on Michael Jackson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 03:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of FBI files on Michael Jackson

The article FBI files on Michael Jackson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:FBI files on Michael Jackson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SNUGGUMS:, I think I checked everything off the last batch of tasks. Thanks for the learning experience, thanks for your time, and thank you for your consideration. TruthGuardians (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome :). I now have passed the nomination. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of FBI files on Michael Jackson

The article FBI files on Michael Jackson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:FBI files on Michael Jackson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) What a wonderful start to my weekend! TruthGuardians (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your brilliant contributions to Wikipedia. Factlibrary1 (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Something VERY IMPORTANT about Michael Jackson ~Please Read!~

Hi my friend!!

I'm about to vote to include Michael Jackson on the "List of articles every Wikipedia should have".

I saw that you included a positive message about Michael Jackson, yet YOU VOTED AGAINST adding Michael Jackson.

The nomination you voted "oppose" is a swap (remove Elvis Presley & add Michael Jackson). I think you simply made a mistake that has made your vote end up being against Michael Jackson and in favor of Elvis.

This is the link to the nomination's voting: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have#Swap_Presley_for_Michael_Jackson

Please edit your vote by changing "oppose" to "support" if possible.

Greetings my friend! Salvabl (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. It is my observation that Elvis was higher up, then they put MJ higher up, and now they are trying to swap Elvis and MJ again. Am I looking at this wrong? TruthGuardians (talk) 21:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TruthGuardians:! I think I understand the reason for the confusion. I mean, Elvis was recently removed from the list of vital articles of the Wikipedia in English language. And Michael Jackson was added to it. This is the link for that list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles

But now, the current voting is on a list that does NOT concern the English-language Wikipedia. It concerns all the Wikipedias in all the languages. Its title is "List of articles every Wikipedia should have". It's a different list.

It is a list of what should be considered vital articles for all Wikipedias in all languages.

This is its link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have

And right now, Elvis Presley IS INCLUDED in that list and Michael Jackson IS NOT INCLUDED in that list.

The nomination in which you (and me) voted is for Removing Elvis from that list and adding Michael Jackson to the list.

And although your message was positive about Michael, yet you voted against the swap (you voted OPPOSE, which means that you are supporting Elvis staying on the list, and you are opposing Michael Jackson to be added to the list).

This list is independent, it's on the Meta-Wiki site, not in the Wikipedia in English language site.

And the current voting is to add Michael Jackson to that list, in which he is not yet on.

If you support adding Michael Jackson to the "List of articles every Wikipedia should have" then you should vote SUPPORT to this nomination:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have#Swap_Presley_for_Michael_Jackson

Your message was perfect, you just need to change "oppose" to "support".

Greetings my friend! =) Salvabl (talk) 11:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you were right. I updated accordingly.

👍🏼 Salvabl (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving Neverland

If you had read the reason provided in the tag I left, you would have seen the comment "Source's credibility needs to be established." Thomson has no Wikipedia article demonstrating his importance, the Leaving Neverland article has no prior mention of him to demonstrate his credibility on the matter, and what's more, his Twitter account isn't even verified - could have been any random person, which was why the tag was left. You also did not address the issue of sourcing a tweet which is discouraged per WP:SELFPUBLISH. No content was removed, only tagged with a request for better sourcing, and establishing who Thomson is and why his opinion is relevant. Instead of making kneejerk reverts in the future, please consider addressing concerns that are raised before removing tags. Thank you. Chase (talk | contributions) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification - Thomson does have an article, but it was not linked to for readers to grasp and have context of his importance. Chase (talk | contributions) 18:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A journalist doesn’t have to have a verified account on social media to be credited as a reliable journalist. The concerns were addressed in my edit summary. Have a read. The source is credible, accepted, and stable. TruthGuardians (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say a verified account was required. I'm telling you what looked questionable to me as someone who was unfamiliar with Thomson and stumbled across a random tweet being used as a source on Wikipedia. And going back to SELFPUBLISH, the use of such sources is not allowed to be used as a third-party source regarding living people (Robson), and is typically not preferred regardless as "if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent reliable sources." Chase (talk | contributions) 18:50, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we’ll change the self published source. Issue resolved. TruthGuardians (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson

Hi TruthGuardians, I've seen your comment on the "Health" Talk Page. I don't edit there. As you might know Alyo is going to edit the article soon. I just wanted to respond to you on your Talk Page. I was also refering to 1993. In his 1993 statement he said he was dependant and he was out of rehab within a few weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quaffel (talk • contribs) 19:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List_of_best-selling_albums

Just an FYI that you should delete the | in your links since it breaks them. That works for internal links but external links use a simple space like this. Slywriter (talk) 02:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you a thanks. I don’t know everything about, but I try. But I see where you are correct about that. Thanks for your time. TruthGuardians (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Best Selling Music Artists

Hey, could we get your input on a discussion happening on the talk page of of the list of best selling music artists? You seem knowledgeable about both the history of the page and the topic more generally, and I would appreciate your perspective. Pacack (talk) 02:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Taj Jackson, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag because it does not violate any rules. TruthGuardians (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heal L.A

Hey TruthGuardians, Im working on a new Wikipedia page on Prince Jacksons Charity foundation. I would like to collaborate with you on this to get it ready to publish on Wikipedia. Here is the draft link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Heal_Los_Angeles_Foundation MraClean (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. TruthGuardians (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im working on it thank you MraClean (talk) 02:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AZ Alkmaar in European Football

Hello, It is stated that there are not reliable resource under the page I created "AZ Alkmaar in European Football". Well, all of the match results have a link in the "football box" template and the links are pointing to "uefa.com". Is UEFA not accepted as a reliable resource? The links of the matches are embedded in the "football box" template as "|report=Report" Can you please reconsider your decision? Because if UEFA is not a reliable source then what is a reliable source? Or am I missing something else here? By the way, I am not new in Wikipedia. I have been doing edits for more than 11 years. Regards... Magawla61 (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 talk[reply]

MJ pages

{{subst:NPOVN-notice}}

This is me trying to notify you about notice board on neutrality but it came out weird! See my talk page comment. Ps - this is Bhdshoes2

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Trial of Michael Jackson into Child sexual abuse accusations against Michael Jackson. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. TruthGuardians (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]