User talk:True Tech Talk Time

Archive

Alternative accounts

I don't see a legitimate basis for you and User:LABcrabs being alternative accounts. The two accounts edit the same articles and participate in the same discussions. See here. A declaration does not make an alternative account legitimate. Please respond.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an easier way for me to separate the items in my watchlist based on topics? If so, I will use this method and merge both accounts. If not, the reason that I have two accounts is to make it easier to split my watchlist by topic. This is what you can observe by watching the Interaction Analyser. --LABcrabs (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But my point is you're not sticking to separate topic areas. You can't have two accounts and edit the same pages and discussions. And it's not just a couple but many, and it's been going on for quite some time.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It happens uncommonly when I forget to switch between both accounts. It looks like you have no answer to my question about watchlists. The goal with my accounts was never to cause malice or to mislead. It's to cover different topics. --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 22:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not uncommon. Your goal about topics and watchlists would be fine, but you've violated your goal too often. It may not be intentionally malicious but it is deceptive on its face. You have a choice. I'm going to let you keep only one account. You pick which one, and I'll block the other.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you merge the accounts, please? I'd like my past contributions to be kept. I also have to move the watchlist between accounts. If you have a way to simply turn True Tech Talk Time in a read-only account, that's fine with me. --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 00:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've backed up my watchlist and I'm aware that an account merge is not possible. --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know of no way to do what you ask. I assume you want to keep LABcrabs and block True Tech Talk Time. Please confirm my assumption.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If my contributions can remain intact, a block is fine. Can I still consult my contributions history by logging in, though? --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 03:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions don't disappear just because an account is blocked, and TTTT's contribution history is available to anyone. TTTT is now blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

I see by your edit to Dancing Stage that you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samsung SGH-C414

The article Samsung SGH-C414 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established by independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Keφr 18:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidéotron Mobile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidéotron Mobile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidéotron Mobile until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Low soloposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Low soloposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Supernova 2" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Supernova 2. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Supernova 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WIND-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WIND-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]