User talk:TrueCRaysball/Archive/5
AN discussion of your ban......is here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Welcome backWell, this isn't something I get to do very often, but I've closed the discussion relating to your ban, and there is a unanimous consensus that you should be given another chance. So welcome back! If I were to offer you any advice at all, it would be to keep a low profile for a little while, maybe write some articles, and generally prove that you're an asset to the project. If you need anything, you're welcome to drop by my talk page. Welcome back. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I would like to note that WikiProject Christianity is currently disfunctional in my opinion. I have started discussion about re-elections of coordinators and will later take on the task of re-organizing the entire project. I would appreciate it if you join the project and participate in the discussion Here. Ryan Vesey (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Caylee Anthony pictureHello, Christianrocker90. I saw your new edit, and remembered that you uploaded the image of Caylee Anthony. And because it was removed from the article earlier before I restored it, I felt you might want to weigh in on the matter at Talk:Casey Anthony trial#Photo. As for placing it in the lead in the way that you did now...since the article has been titled away from the child's death to the Casey Anthony trial, I'm not so sure about that. We might get even more editors saying the Caylee image is not needed or doesn't help. Flyer22 (talk) 20:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Assassins Creed WikiI'm sorry, but WP:ELNO specifically states "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors," which simply doesn't apply in this case. You will need a consensus to override this. Very few wikis have become accepted in such a way. Memory Alpha is the only example that springs to mind. Rehevkor ✉ 01:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Caylee anthony.jpg listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caylee anthony.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC) ThanksThanks for fixing my double ref, was just looking up how to do it, little rusty at this lol. Cyraan (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Haines City Crest.jpgThanks for uploading File:Haines City Crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE:
File:Wwelogo.png listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wwelogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 21:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Hey, it's been about a week now with no opposition, do you think someone should go ahead with the merge?--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Your request for rollbackHi CRRaysHead90. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 06:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Re: Human conservation statusIt's relevant, it's interesting (that the classification agency made such a statement/evaluation), it's in keeping with other species articles. I don't see any particular reason to remove it. Unless we should just remove the entire Human article, because of course all are readers know what humans are like, right? --Cybercobra (talk) 09:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
WrestleMania XXVIIIYou should know that is flagrant Crystal Ball. And WWE is very unpredictable. For all we know he could tear an ACL and be out for a year.--Voices in my Head WWE 22:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Try obeying WP's rulesCRRays, perhaps you should follow WP's rules by not using blogs as sources. I have every right to revert something b/c you fail to follow the rules. Stop using blogs! JaMikePA (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
I've showed you the rules again and again. Ignorance is not bliss! Stop denying the rules and follow them! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources JaMikePA (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks......for the barnstar! WilliamH (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC) TUSC token 2d024fe2abc5938a31edee9d55f7edcaI am now proud owner of a TUSC account! December 2011 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WrestleMania XXVIII. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 21:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Fyi
Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.pngThanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.pngThanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC) I see that you uploaded the January 1, 2012 front page image of this newspaper, but could you have done so under a different file name? The file name implies that it's the Oct. 16, 2008 issue, as the old image was. The new file name should reflect the date and the paper's new name. The old image should probably have stayed around under the old file name. I would have fixed this myself, but I don't work with files that much so I wasn't sure how. Thanks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC) The article How You Like Me Now? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing TalkbackHello, TrueCRaysball. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
Message added 03:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mtking (edits) 03:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Helmet filesPlease do not remove TalkbackHello, TrueCRaysball. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League.
Message added 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mtking (edits) 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC) January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projectsThe January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Simple English WikipediaHello. I am letting you know that I have left a message on your talkpage at Simple English Wikipedia. I am notifying you here solely as I do not know if you still monitor that talkpage and if you receive any notifications from such. Normandie 13:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
BarnstarThat compromise is fine. It's just odd to have "number" listed with nothing following it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately not. The intention of the protection is to disallow reinstatement of the article until a day after the actual event, by which the notability of the event or lack thereof will be clearly established. Until then, relevant important information should be included on WWE Extreme Rules as appropriate. Deryck C. 07:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Re:Edit summaryIt was wrong because you started the 24-hour format at 12:00 am local time. We go by UTC, which means that you would have needed to start at 8:00 pm EDT and work forward that way. By converting the way you did then the times are four hours ahead. And in response to your next question, we always go by UTC time for tornadoes because of different time zones. United States Man (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
|