User talk:Trevor macinnis

Redirect to:

• User talk:Trevor MacInnis

Article ratings

You seem not to have read this advice: "(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)" Now you have rated all these articles. What is anyone supposed to do with your rating? Paul Beardsell 00:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

aircraft article assessment

Please refer Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#article_assessments. You are assessing scores of articles ignoring the request to give the reasons for your assessment and to provide suggestions as to improvement. I think assessments such as yours are useless and counterproductive - like all unreasoned criticism it just demotivates those actually trying to make a positive impact on the encyclopedia. It is just as easy to improve an article as it is to give a properly reasoned, constructive critique. Please stop the assessments, start on improvements. Thank you. Paul Beardsell 00:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article ratings

You seem not to have read this advice: "(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)" Now you have rated all these articles. What is anyone supposed to do with your rating?

Please refer Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#article_assessments. You are assessing scores of articles ignoring the request to give the reasons for your assessment and to provide suggestions as to improvement. I think assessments such as yours are useless and counterproductive - like all unreasoned criticism it just demotivates those actually trying to make a positive impact on the encyclopedia. It is just as easy to improve an article as it is to give a properly reasoned, constructive critique. Please stop the assessments, start on improvements. Thank you.

Paul Beardsell 00:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]