Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - theWOLFchild21:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. clpo13(talk)15:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skywalker family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Force. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doctor Strange may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Star Wars characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Morton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited X-Men (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alkali Lake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I understand you're a new editor, only here since last month, so you might not know some of the policies and guidelines in place; I'd urge you to read the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. What you are doing at X-Men Origins: Wolverine is called edit-warring. When an editor reverts one of your edits, protocol is to to discuss your issue on the article's talk page and try to reach consensus with other editors. In this particular case, you're violating WP:FILMPLOT, which says that plots are 400 to 700 words only. Secondly, the claims you're making are already described in the "Filming" section and do not belong in two places. So if you feel you need to pursue this, please go to the article's talk page. Edit-warring can lead to admins blocking you from editing. Thank you for understanding that we try to work together here and not antagonistically.--Tenebrae (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Gordon in other media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batman & Robin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Joker (The Dark Knight), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Gordon and James Gordon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please review WP:BRD. When edits that you make are reverted, it is considered best practice to initiate a discussion at the article's Talk page and obtain a consensus rather than simply restoring your edits. Thank you for your understanding! DonIago (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to say the same thing. TotalTruthTeller24, I know you've only been a registered editor since March, but that's plenty of time to have learned not to WP:EDITWAR. When reverted, please discuss issues on the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Right, didn't know this. Thank you Tenebrae. TotalTruthTeller24 (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2016 (ROI)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Conjuring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annabelle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fullerverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Problems with upload of File:Cropped-fullerverse-header-3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cropped-fullerverse-header-3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading File:Out-of-the-shadows.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for File:Saw Gerrera.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Saw Gerrera.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:NuxChromeSpray.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:NuxChromeSpray.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
Thank you for uploading File:Nux&Family.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
Thank you for uploading File:NuxFury.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
File copyright problem with File:DwayneTheStranger.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DwayneTheStranger.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
Thanks for uploading File:Cropped-fullerverse-header-3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Annie Porter.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for File:Gwenpool.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gwenpool.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Looks like you were warned about this a few months ago. Please take this seriously, it affects other editors.McGeddon (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Ben-Affleck-Batman.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Problems with upload of File:Crazy Dave.png
Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Dave.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading File:Edgar Zomboss.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Crazy Dave.png
Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Dave.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egon Spengler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beeline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Access (short story), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. TigraanClick here to contact me20:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Dana Barrett.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dana Barrett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello TotalTruthTeller24, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ghostbusters (franchise) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Your addition to Star Wars: Tarkin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — TAnthonyTalk15:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Star Wars: Dark Disciple has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — TAnthonyTalk15:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tenebrae (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Batman (1989 film series)
DO NOT make major unilateral name changes to articles without gaining consensus through Wikipedia:Requested moves. I understand you've only been on Wikipedia since March, but it's important to learn policies and protocols. One of the most important is gaining consensus. Thank you for understanding, and please iniate discussion on the article talk page before making such a move in the future. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
July 2016
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Batman (1989 film series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk22:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warcraft (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Out of the Shadows (Alien), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Narcissus and Xenomorph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cars (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Ferguson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Laura Kinney a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hut 8.521:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Claire Pemple.png
Thank you for uploading File:Claire Pemple.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Orphaned non-free image File:Claire Pemple.png
Thanks for uploading File:Claire Pemple.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Gwen Stacy Deadpool Amalgam.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ghostbusters II. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You seem to be ignoring all attempts to contact you. I see very little use of talk pages and no responses to comments here. You have been repeatedly asked not to mark significant changes as "minor" edits, yet you continue to do so. I see several issues popping up repeatedly. Please discuss the issues here and/or on the articles' talk pages. Thanks.SummerPhDv2.020:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghostbusters (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reboot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I noticed your recent edit to Melissa McCarthy does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Notice is in regard to this edit [1]. If you had used the edit summary explaining the content change, I would not have reverted it only to find out your edit was in response to an article move/title change. -- WV ● ✉✓16:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Mask (comics). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Star Trek (film series), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhDv2.023:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:GwenpoolMFF.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GwenpoolMFF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:GwenpoolMFFLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, TotalTruthTeller24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:Logan Main Cast.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Wars (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clone wars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give X-Men (Fox franchise) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth16:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I see that you have made several edits involving the character Henry from Dead Men Tell No Tales. If you could share your sources at the discussion that I started here, I would appreciate it.
Hi. A belated Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Spider-Man (Miles Morales). However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If the information came from an issue of a comic, then please cite the issue. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Moving the Spider-Man movie articles without consensus
Just a friendly note to let you know that unless it's an obvious misspelling or some such, we do not unilaterally move articles without discussion and consensus. There is a whole process for this. See WP:RM. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Poster of Spider-Man Strikes Back.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Poster of Spider-Man Strikes Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Poster of Spider-Man- The Dragon's Challenge.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Poster of Spider-Man- The Dragon's Challenge.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alien (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TED 2023. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I've removed the table for the chronological order that you added over at X-Men (film series). I do think it is a great edition but the article is so long already. Instead I wanted to discuss with you about creating an article especially for chronological order where further references can be added and more details can be explored. Brocicle (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
List of X-Men characters
I wanted to bring this here, as you are on the verge of edit warring and I wanted to explain why I have reverted your changes. Please review WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Your changes are in violation of both of these rules. Even your attempted changes do not satisfy those requirements. The vast majority of your "references" are just you either explaining your original research or are just flat out wrong (for example you say that X2 states in the film it takes place in 2003. It does not). And that is just one example. And even some of your math, which does constitute WP:SYNTH is inaccurate.
Frankly, the entire section doesn't belong on this page, as it doesn't really help someone visiting the page. If you revert again without either real references (not your original research), I will report you for edit warring. I certainly don't want to do that. Rcarter555 (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As a courtesy, and since I have the time, let me go through each of your "references" and explain why I think they violate Wikipedia policy or where they're just incorrect.
X-Men Apocalypse: 3600 BCE - There is no reference for this date, other than the historical date for when the Pyramids were constructed, which is OR and SYNTH and shouldn't be a benchmark in a fictional universe in any event.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine: 1961-1975; 1981 - You've listed every year of the Vietnam War (since you rightly presume there is no reference to an actual date), but by doing so, you make the 1981 date original research. Again, 1975 was the end of the Vietnam War in our world, but who knows about the X-Men universe? Also, if you are going to use real world events to date the movies (you shouldn't), then the Three Mile Island meltdown took place in 1979, not 1981. Again, all original research.
X-Men and X2: 2003 - You claim the year 2003 is mentioned in X2, but it isn't. No where in the film is a date given.
X-Men: The Last Stand: 2006 - You claim the year 2006 is mentioned in Last Stand (although you have a typo of 2003 in your reference), but it is not. No year is indicated.
Wolverine: 2007 - Again, this is based off the faulty 2006 year for Last Stand, but you also state the film says it takes place one year after Last Stand. I don't believe it does, but since Last Stand had no set year, it doesn't matter.
Deadpool: 2015-2017 - Based on what? Your "reference" is simply your statement that the film takes place over these years. There is no verifiable reference to this. The year the film is released is immaterial.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Archer characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Newman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for uploading File:DeathBattle-1-2-3.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:DeathBattle-4-present.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:The-Desk-Of-Death-Battle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:DeathBattleX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:DeathBattleCast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Yeah, I figured that much, but it's still a good idea to check these notifications anyway, it's not as if you made very many of them. - theWOLFchild03:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I apologise for my use of multiple accounts for editing of Wikipedia, I understand now that I should have stuck to using one account. I never intended for any of my edits to be seen as improper or breach community trust, and for that I am truly sorry. Every edit I've made has been intended to improve Wikipedia as a whole, mainly on pages covering modern media (Blade Runner, Rick and Morty, etc.). I promise to stick to the one account from now on. (Also, I've been saying this for some time, but User:GolfingIreland is not me) Thank you for your time. Sincerely, TotalTruthTeller24 (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Decline reason:
Given your history of sockpuppetry, you are considered banned under WP:3X. In order to be unbanned, we'll need you to state whether or not you've performed any edits at all over the last six months, we'll need you to craft an unblock request that the community can discuss and which has a reasonable chance of leading to your ban being lifted (this one has no chance), and we'll need a checkuser to confirm your statements. You are welcome to craft a new request once you address these concerns. Yamla (talk) 13:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You haven't indicated whether or not you've edited over the past six months. You also imply that you didn't know we prohibit use of multiple accounts. You clearly knew and decided to continue doing so, deliberately violating WP:SOCK, over the course of months and deliberately violating the community's trust in doing so. It's great that you now intend to stick to one account only, but need to address these issues head-on if you wish to have any chance of earning back the community's trust. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla: My last edits according to this conversation were a about a few days before the 17th February 2018, 6 months on from there being the 17 August 2018. I do not recall precisely when I last edited Wikipedia, but I would assume I was being accurate in my message to @NinjaRobotPirate: on that date. When I first created multiple accounts I didn't know they were prohibited, but I continued using them after I learned they were disallowed, and for that I am genuinely sorry. How precisely do I "address these issues head-on"? TotalTruthTeller24 (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, @Joeyconnick: & @DisneyMetalhead:, with regards to your debate on The Conjuring Universe, Warner Bros. referred to the franchise in their rules for "My Annabelle Creation" at https://www.myannabellecreation.co.uk/ long before the featurette for The Nun. Given how it is used, I assume the name is copyrighted. Here is the segment in question:
“
(iv) The Video may include positive, non-disparaging, verbal/textual references to the The Conjuring Universe, the Film, and characters appearing therein (collectively the “Warner Bros. Content”), but not any trailer, film clip, image, music, or advertising material from or for the Film or any film in The Conjuring Universe or any talent appearing therein. Warner Bros. Content may only be used by an Entrant for entry into the Competition and in accordance with these Rules, and for no other purpose;
Just so you know, when you are blocked, you are only supposed to use your talk page to get unblocked. Pinging other editors to edit pages by proxy isn't allowed. I'm just letting you know because you might lose your talk page access, and then the only way to appeal your block will be by email through UTRS. - wolf12:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Bishop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tangled - Before Ever After logo.png listed for discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Slimer.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TotalTruthTeller24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.