Hello, Tobias ToMar Maier. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello Tobias "ToMar" Maier, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~ and our software will automatically convert it to your username and the date.
I was just on and about to complain but Google patent search kicked my rear end: [1]. They MAY have coined the term Bodysuit, but the Idea isn't new, just cheaper by design. The main intend of adding the source was to show that there is a clear distinction for leotards and bodysuits from a source who has manufactured them for a long time. At least for females. What about writing in the article Bodysuit "Danskin claims to have invented the Bodysuit by adding snaps to the crotches of their leotards. Although patents on very similar garments pre-date this claim." --Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that we can't trust a self-published source, in this case the manufacturer, to make that claim. They are inherently self-serving, especially when it comes to stating their product is first or best or has some (possibly arbitrary) distinction from other products. Now if a reliable, third-party published source—for example, if someone who is recognized as an expert and independent of any manufacturer wrote a book on the history of leotards and bodysuits—says it's an important distinction, then by all means we can include it. I hope this helps. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 20:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
