This is an archive of past discussions with User:ToadetteEdit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thanks for your contributions to Attaba (Cairo Metro). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auto rickshaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heliopolis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi, I noticed you put a missing padlock icon in on William Shatner, thanks for this. I've noticed there are a few other protected pages missing the padlock icon:
Thank you for your help with that - for me it feels like less work to tire out IP vandals than to try to figure out how to get things protected (it's probably easy, I just don't do it often enough to remember how to go about it). Appreciate your work. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Larson (Internet personality). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Do not attempt to write another article on this subject. He is not notable by Wikipedia standards and the articles appear to be harassment, if not by you then by other editors who contribute to the page. It looks like trolling behavior. Stick to the very contructive work you are doing to improve the proejct. Thank you for your other contributions. LizRead!Talk!18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, the problem is that I tried to change the font color, it says html errors for some reason. I've tried out and it was nice, but changed the green color to pink. Anyways, thsnk you for the advice. ToadetteEdit(chat)/ (logs) 08:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
You are a fairly new editor (account created in May) with 551 edits, of which about 10% are in Wikipedia space. You are not initiating reports at administrator noticeboards but commenting on them, like some sort of clerk. I can't speak for other administrators, but I don't find your comments helpful, and I don't think you should be making them. It's an unusual thing for a new user to do. Have you ever had other accounts here?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
I used to have an account a few years ago but I was locked out and so I logged out on all my devices and didn't made any edits, but but I am helpful in cases of vandalism and page protection. ToadetteEdit(chat)/(logs)13:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
What do you mean by "locked out"? What was the username of the other account? And no, in my view you are not helpful at AIV or RFPP.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
The username for the previous account was renamed to Unleashedwiki because it revealed my real name in full, but then when I tried to log in I got usernsme/password errors, even though I saved the information on Google's Password Manager. Anyways, I will try not to be curious at AIV or RFPP by commenting much, as it might potentially increase server load.
You had an e-mail address associated with the old account, which means you could have reset the password, regardless of Google's Password Manager, but that's pretty much moot a year later. I'm not sure what your comments at AIV and RFPP have to do with being "curious", nor do I understand your server load comment, but at the risk of repeating myself, it's better for you not to comment at all at those two boards or any other administrative noticeboard, unless it involves you, of course.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Also, regarding the password reset, I am not accusing you of resetting the password. I am just saying that it was an option available to you at the time that you may not have been aware of.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Starting from today, threads without replies for 30 days will be archived. This is done to clean up the clutter in this talk page, and to forget the old threads that have been dead for a month. Thank you for reading this. ToadetteEdit(chat)/(logs)15:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fakir Aziao-Din, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Watch out for WP:MIRRORs when looking for sources! Both of the sources you added to this article credited Wikipedia as the origin of their text, in the small print.Belbury (talk) 09:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
UAA
Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Stelios Mainas
Hi, could you check out the discussion at Talk:Stelios Mainas § Television table? It seems to be a legitimate content dispute or at least a misunderstanding and I'd like to hear your thoughts on whether there really should be a "television" table on the article or not. — AP 499D25(talk)08:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
You should not be replacing other users' comments. (See WP:TPO.) To make matters worse, you added {{checkuserblock-account}}. CU blocks can only be designated by CUs. (Not every block made by a CU is a CU block. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi ToadetteEdit! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Please do not give poor advice to blocked editors. Let administrators interact with editors indefinitely blocked for legal threats. This account is not blocked for problems with referencing, as your comment implied. Your comment is a distraction from the main issue. Cullen328 (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
More broadly, do not give bad advice to any editor. Be sure that your comment is truly helpful before you publish it. Do not "wing it" or offer hunches. Cullen328 (talk) 17:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Привіт ToadetteEdit.
Мені не вдається доповнити вікіпедію матеріалами, українською та російською мовами, на тему:Інад (PLA2G6) інфантильна нейроаксональна дистрофія.
Чи можу я вас попросити додати такі матеріали?
Що тема повина включати:
Симптоми;
Прогнози;
Лікування;
Експерименти та дослідження;
Розробка геної терапії.
Усі посилання на доказові сайти можу надати. Bella.Miller.N (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Ok, but please provide reliable sources other than Wikipedia next time. I can only help in English, but use Google Translate to view my statement correctly. Thanks. ToadetteEdit(chat)/(logs)19:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Untitled
i have edited this information as another band appears to be using the logo of my band. i have simply changed the information to match the picture as noted in my editing reasons. if this is not correct can you please remove my bands logo from another bands information Gateway.band (talk) 09:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
Use common sense.
To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Some Serbian nationalist from ip address
2804:388:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 is adding information about birth place of authors without providing references. Kudiophi clopsvimbi (talk) 10:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
this is not for propreties for sale, or spam link, its a link to the most famous website in chesapeake that's collect all apartments and give reviews its trusted website existing before 16 years. I'll add it again SOUHAIB BELAMRI (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Please I just needed a backlink and my friends told to come here because the also added there links here to help there website that is why I added mine. Please I don't know if were I added mine is wrong please help me out by adding it to the right place link url https://gbxclusive.com.ng/102.88.34.252 (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The link you are trying to add is considered spam and should not be added to article unless if it is related to the subject, in this case, Gbxclusive. Toadette(chat)/(logs)19:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: This is a pattern that Toadette, despite being asked/warned not to, persists in doing. Frankly, I would be inclined to block them from project space as it's more than one noticeboard.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Starting from today, I won't touch the project space again, not a single one, unless if it is necessary. I removed all Chrome shortcuts to them and soon clear history on the Android app to forget them. I have no idea of such discussion taking overnight and woke up with it. I will continue watching the edit filter log for further disruption. Thanks. ToadetteEdit(chat)/(logs)07:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
I value your countervandalism in the article namespace, and I've granted you rollback to assist you with this as requested. I haven't yet seen bad reverts, although of course they may exist, but that would then be a different discussion topic.
You haven't answered the question yet though. You don't have to, of course, but I'm genuinely interested in the answer or I wouldn't have asked.
And yes, a block from project space would prevent you from reporting vandalism at AIV, which is something I'd like to avoid as I don't intend to restrict your ability to deal with vandalism. I'm just really confused why there is apparently a perceived need to comment on others' reports there and elsewhere. If I understand your motivation for doing so and can persuade you to stop doing it, we're already fine.
@ToBeFree, in the comment of the first diff, I added a statement regarding that vandalism happened soon after protection expired. The second diff is a general comment stating that the user reported themselves at AIV. For reference, the editors seems to dislike my comments even though I tried to improve it. Toadette(chat)/(logs)10:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
No, ToadetteEdit, that's what you did after thinking. You are describing the diff itself. I'm asking for your reasoning. Your thoughts behind this. How did you notice the report? What did you do when seeing it? Did you visit AIV, see a report and open the contribution list for someone else's report, for example? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:56, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Okay. That's the first thing I do when processing reports too. And even if someone else did before, I'd still have to verify this, so you're not saving me work by doing so. You've been stating the obvious in these comments (and are doing so again below, "adding inappropriate external links is not allowed", just saying). Perhaps you could simply not do that. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
ToadetteEdit, you promised to stop clerking at ANI about 10 days ago. Nonetheless, you've continued to do so, including making non-admin closures. I've therefore blocked you from editing at ANI for 3 months. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights. Any appeal must come from this page. Please don't start arguing about the block in other venues.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@Bbb23 I now see, the same problem. Your comment has made trauma to come upon me. The same situation when I abandoned my tablet for a week because I was awake past 10pm. I will be forced to return to my sandboxes and the edit filter tomorrow. I would really leave the community again because of this, but Wikipedia is my home. Even when I come back learning in October, I will never forget such action and be 'vanished' from the noticeboards. For reference, until the end of November I will not visit any project space. I would also thank myself and God for the hard work I've done. Best regards, Toadette(chat)/(logs)16:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Now I knew my lesson, it is not right to comment useless, strange comments on noticeboards, except if it involves me of course. As a person who makes promises but break it everytime, I've made 250+ edits in the project space, but half of it is basically junk comment which drew attention on my talk page. Some more than three unique editors expressed their concerns on my replies. I even requested closure of an SPI but an admin said not to do this. Furthermore, I will stop asking questions on RFAs, just voting based on my decisions. And again, no more posting replies on any noticeboard. I will just go to my everyday editing once I return to my tablet tomorrow. I would thank the blocking admin Bbb23 and otherwise the unblocking admin for reading this. For reference, I am partially blocked from the incidents noticeboard, and requested unblocking from the mobile app so I can't sign inside the template from wikitext. Toadette(chat)/(logs)14:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If there is a noticeboard discussion you need to participate in, please re-request with a link to it. Else, I see no need for an unblock, especially looking at earlier broken promises. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You removed the content that I added to a page. But I don't think I added anything wrong there. Here, the source https://en.prothomalo.com/sports/Bangladesh-lose-Mushfiq says Mushfiq's nickname is mr dependable (I think it is a reliable source, isnt it?) However I request you to check it again. And "Musfiq" is not his nickname according to any source. Tajwar4 (talk) 11:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment at Arbitration case request. I appreciate that you at least looked at the links I provided and added your opinion. I realize the sock issue is a little out of the scope of this particular case but I believe it has some relevance. Cheers, Mark Ironie (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Hello ToadetteEdit! Your additions to Regional Ring Road (Egypt) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MER-C18:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to 2023 evacuations from Israel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Crypto Aid Israel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Cryptocurrencies etc
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It seems never ending sometimes doesn't it (the vandalism). I didn't appreciate how much work is put in keeping vandalism at bay. You are appreciated. Knitsey (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Aid Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Despite your good intentions, almost all of the commenting editors cite policy reasons for removal. The source analysis tells you even more.
The world of crypto currency is very close to a scam in many people's views. That makes the topic itself notable, assuming references can be found, but individual businesses within it not so much. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
I think it was very mature of you, ToadetteEdit, to see the arguments in the AFD and tag your own article for CSD G7 speedy deletion. It's hard for most content creators to take that step but consensus was against keeping the article so your action served not to prolong the discussion. Good luck with your future articles! LizRead!Talk!07:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
_by_Ron.jpg)
