User talk:Titan2456

Welcome to my talk page!
Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas L. Kennedy Secondary School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I will try to find a citation or a source and edit it a later time, Thank you. Titan2456 (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by nominations

Please stop nominating articles you have no contributions to for GA. This is against the rules and all drive-by nominations have been reverted. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was a unaware of that rule, Thank you for alerting me. Titan2456 (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I am replying after a really long time, but I was wondering, can I nominate an article for GA while not being a significant contributor so that I can make the changes necessary for the article to become GA worthy. Titan2456 (talk) 01:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA

I would really, strongly, advise you to withdraw your nomination for Treaty of Saadabad. It is a long way from GA. It has bare urls, non-standard formatting, and needs a vigorous copyedit. I haven't looked at the sourcing quality, but there are several unreferenced claims. I urge your to quietly withdraw it and gain experience with the GA criteria, rather than have it quick-failed, which is liable to happen. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Titan2456 (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How was it not neutral? Titan2456 (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should give up now. If you continue, he may report you because he reported me for the same issue. Elanoraga (talk) 12:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I’ll keep trying, If they answer to my query and give a good reason I’ll give up. Titan2456 (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of political parties in Pakistan. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image Licenses of Imran Khan

Hey fella! Hope you are doing well! I was just here conveying message to please upload any of the images on wikimedia commons according to license guidelines and copyright rukes, just like I have recently gone through the recently two uploaded images of Imran Khan as YouTube screenshots, I am requesting to change its license immediately from cc by sa 4.0 to cc by 3.0 YouTube one to avoid their deletion in future and as far as the darkened portrait of Imran you uploaded and used in his sidebar as image it is bound to have copyright rules conflict and will be deleted immediately because it is not part of a YouTube video screenshot and either a thumbnail of Khan's photograph which can be easily found as single image on his social media accounts so it will almost get deketed immediately so I will request you to request it for deletion immediately and be aware with copyright rules in future! Well have a nice day! ☺️ Wallu2 (talk) 02:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! By the way I greatly appreciate and admire all your work on Pakistani political Wikipedia pages, Have a nice day too! 😊 Titan2456 (talk) 03:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licenses have been changed to CC by 3.0. 👍 Titan2456 (talk) 03:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Pervaiz Elahi sidebar has been accepted

Template:Pervaiz Elahi sidebar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 07:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Ayub Khan sidebar has been accepted

Template:Ayub Khan sidebar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 07:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure

Hello, Titan2456. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? Titan2456 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your pattern of editing shows as if an editor paid by PTI would do. You need to properly disclose this information if you are on PTI payroll as it signifies conflict of interest. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not paid by anyone I edit Wikipedia as a hobby, I can also comment on your editing pattern of constantly deleting information that portrays certain politicians like Asif Ali Zardari in a bad light, in a kind of censorship. I’m not paid by anyone to edit including the PTI. Titan2456 (talk) 19:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You create controversial maps using propaganda from the PTI website and consistently rely on this site for sourcing contentious information. You regularly include negative information about PTI's opponents while highlighting positive aspects of PTI and its leaders. You engage in edit wars with yourself over Imran's pictures. Your overall editing is very biased and fails to meet NPOV standards. To me, this suggests a personal affiliation with PTI or paid editing. Although we can never have hard evidence, these editing patterns raise suspicions. Please stop using the PTI website as a source and using Wikipedia to promote PTI propaganda. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When did I ever use the PTI website as a source, the only time was to create a map of explicitly what the PTI CLAIMS, am I supposed to check the PMLN’s website for what the PTI claims? I never use the PTI as a citation on Wikipedia, only when I explicitly state that it is a CLAIM from PTI I cite their website. As for Imran’s pictures, I also had a mini edit war with myself over Shehbaz Sharif’s picture to make it more high quality before reverting it. You can have your suspicions, and I have mine. Titan2456 (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t want any more conflict, and I don’t want to be rude so I’ll work on Pakistani history articles rather than Pakistani modern political articles for now. Titan2456 (talk) 21:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think we have policies against using primary sources? A political party can post any propaganda on their website, but Wikipedia shouldn't propagate their propaganda by simply repeating their claims. If a secondary reliable source doesn't validate their claim, why should Wikipedia? Their claims need to be verifiable by a secondary reliable source before being included on Wikipedia. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You would obviously get PTI claims from PTI… from their website, I stated that it was their claims whether or not it was propaganda, it seems as this is your opinion. Titan2456 (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't just my opinion; please refer to WP:PRIMARY. We cannot use primary sources, especially for controversial claims. If we followed your logic, supporters of every party would add their propaganda, citing their party's website as the source for their claims. Additionally, your defense of including PTI propaganda only reinforces my suspicions. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never defended PTI, I only just said that you would get party claims from the party itself whether it was from the PTI, PPP, PMLN, or any other party, thanks for bringing this to my attention, I’ll not use primary sources next time, though this doesn’t justify removing the map. Titan2456 (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it does justify it—the map was created by you using propaganda from the PTI website, it is not supported by any reliable secondary source. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARY says that it requires a secondary source for interpretation, not for all purposes, especially claims, that I have explicitly said are party claims, the map has 4 citations from PTI, which Wikimedia Commons permits, I don’t know how to explain to you more that I can only get a party claim from the party itself. Following WP:PRIMARY, there is no interpretation, only data and therefore there is no need for additional secondary sources. Titan2456 (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a map based on a primary source reflects your interpretation of the data. You can't simply take party claims from their website, as those can be propaganda. That's why I insist on using a secondary source for any controversial claims. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda from whom? Titan2456 (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained myself sufficiently. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, they can be propaganda from the party, but thats the point it is supposed to be a claim from the party itself. Titan2456 (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek Tahafuz Ayin has been accepted

Tehreek Tahafuz Ayin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tehreek Tahafuz Ayin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liaquat Ali Khan government has been accepted

Liaquat Ali Khan government, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Titan2456 (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Titan2456. Thank you for your work on لیاقت علی خان حکومت. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello. Did you realize that you wrote this article in Urdu language? Please replace it with English language immediately. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:2024 Pakistani Election Party has been accepted

Template:2024 Pakistani Election Party, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:2024 Pakistani Election Constituency

A tag has been placed on Template:2024 Pakistani Election Constituency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A very useless template, just further increases clutter on articles and Wikipedia in general.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Liaquat Ali Khan government

The article Liaquat Ali Khan government you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Liaquat Ali Khan government for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Parvez Elahi Punjab Cabinet Oath.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Parvez Elahi Punjab Cabinet Oath.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, after some searching I found this free image of 2 senior cabinet members, I think it is replaceable, it can be deleted immediately Titan2456 (talk) 15:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pakistan Reserve Seats Case has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pakistan Reserve Seats Case. Thanks! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I responded there I'll attach my response here as well: Agreed not every case deserves a stand alone article, but this case is extremely politically important right now, it affects the current government’s majority, the result of the case would either give PTI, the opposition party, the plurality, hence greatly affecting Pakistan’s current government, or it would strength en the govt. Hence it is noteworthy as it is one of the top cases in Pakistan, as all judges of the SC have been assembled and it would affect the number of seats in every national and provincial assembly.

To answer your first question, It has been called the “Reserve Seats Case” all across news and media, adding Pakistan at the start would make it so it doesn’t overlap into another country’s parliament’s reserve seats, but it can be moved if required. Titan2456 (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PTI reserved seats case has been accepted

PTI reserved seats case, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 23:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parvez Elahi Punjab Cabinet Oath.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parvez Elahi Punjab Cabinet Oath.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Gandapur ministry

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was unaware of the living person criteria, Faez Isa would still definitely need an image as he holds a top role but if it violates the living person criteria then I agree it should be deleted. Titan2456 (talk) 02:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Chief Minister of Balochistan, Sarfraz Bugti.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Chief Minister of Balochistan, Sarfraz Bugti.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Avoid leaving bad faith edit summaries like this one. When there is already extensive content on Maryam's corruption by Saqib and others, there's not much more for me to add. But what about you? You’re eager to write about the corruption of non-PTI politicians such as Murad Ali Shah while consistently adding positive content about PTI. If you won’t address PTI's corruption, someone else will have to do it. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I was saying that there is no corruption allegations section on any other provincial ministry article other than Gandapur which you added. I’m here to improve articles so I find this comment on my talk page unnecessary. If you found my edit summary rude then I apologize but if you do not have any information to add or remove involving me then this is an unnecessary comment. Titan2456 (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arshad Ayub Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concord College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your recent edit(s) to Qazi Ahmed Akbar has been reverted due to the inclusion of original research, which violates Wikipedia's policies. Please refrain from adding original research to articles in the future and ensure that all contributions are supported by reliable sources. This helps ensure the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia content. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the citation for all of the information which is this: https://www.pap.gov.pk/members/profile/en/22/1676 Titan2456 (talk) 15:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Ali Amin Gandapur

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parvez Elahi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parvez Elahi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Saqib -- Saqib (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parvez Elahi

The article Parvez Elahi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Parvez Elahi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Saqib -- Saqib (talk) 08:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Palh

The article Ali Palh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is insufficient in-depth coverage on this individual to satisfy the criteria outlined in WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DRN and WP:ANI

It is not useful to file case requests about the same article at two noticeboards, such as DRN and WP:ANI, at the same time. I have closed the DRN discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the same article, ANI is about the Imran Khan BLP and DRN is about a section on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, different pages. ANI is also on behavioral POV pushing, while DRN is about a specific content dispute. However, if you think closing DRN is the right decision I do not oppose it. Titan2456 (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24 November Protest

Hello, will you be creating an article about the 24 November protest? If so, I would like to help. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 08:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is created as November 2024 Pakistani protests, you can edit there. Thank you! Titan2456 (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:46, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of rigging in the 2024 Pakistani general election

I have requested third opinion regarding the template matter from an uninvolved editor at WP:3O. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Titan2456 (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two barnstars for you!

		The Feathered Quill Barnstar
		For contributing over 3,000 edits and creating 12 articles, this achievement is well-earned. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Turning Wikipedia Green Barnstar
		For making over 250 substantial edits, exceeding 1000 bytes each! WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I don’t know if I am deserving of this but it means a lot to me, thanks. Titan2456 (talk) 23:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Khan's portrait image

Please change back portrait of Imran's main article to this one

User:RehanBee who uploaded current one residing in main article seems to be much of low resolution as compare to your upload.202.59.13.82 (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Titan2456 (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Long question, but I'm looking for admin advice on conduct in a situation and what to-do:
User:SheriffIsInTown has been casting aspersions and making personal attacks to me for several months now. This is a very recent example:

You have a very poor understanding of Wikipedia policies and processes including WP:BRD, WP:COI, WP:3RR, WP:4RR, and WP:GAN. In fact your talk page is filled with failure notices of GAN so please do not tell us what are the problems with this article on its way to GAN as your POV pushing might be the biggest of them all.
This personal attack is almost identical to the "You're a railfan so what would you know about fashion?" mentioned in WP:ADHOMINEM.

The repeated past examples of this are:

Why do you ping the whole junta whenever there is a conflict? We have neutral forums such as WP:3O and WP:DRN. Do you ever see me pinging anyone? You only do so because you are confident you’ll receive support from these editors.
I requested a clarification for this evidence-less allegation per the first step of WP:DEALWITHINCIVIL but they have refused to respond. This is a continuation of making allegations about other users in the middle of a content discussion and not clarifying.

Verification failed, Who writes these for you? Do you read the sources yourself or just add whatever and add wherever sources to support the claims.

Why do you consistently choose the most positive angles for PTI and Imran Khan and never balance it with contrary views to maintain neutrality? I am simply correcting the one-sided narrative, which came across as a chancellorship campaign, portraying him as suffering and still fighting and campaigning from jail. Why didn’t you include the opposing perspective from the start so I wouldn’t have had to step in? Why do you always behave as if you're working for them?
These were evidence-less allegations after I raised concerns over a libelous paragraph on an opinion piece they added. I pointed out these were baseless allegations and they responded with "Avoid making assumptions about others if you don’t want assumptions to be made in return."

Please have mercy on us and don’t write the summary, let someone else do it.
This is a discouraging and uncivil remark, so I told them how I felt per the fourth step of WP:DEALWITHINCIVIL, but they didn't clarify, in comments like these are continuing to reject my work even before it is shown.

Seeking assistance — What should I do in this situation? Thank you. --Titan2456 (talk) 03:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm not sure what administrative action this requires, at least at this point? It seems to be a conduct dispute, at least partly based on a content dispute. The recommended procedure for handling both is laid out in WP:DISPUTE.

If things get to a point where admin intervention is required, I would suggest posting a case at WP:ANI, where you are likely to get a faster response, and where more than one admin can contribute to the proceedings.

You can also ask other user(s) not to post on your talk page, per WP:KEEPOFF.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asif Zardari infobox

Hey there! Can you please revert the change of infobox image of Asif Ali Zardari's article to most recent one of 2024, a user named "Aryan" has changed it a while ago dunno why? 202.59.12.145 (talk) 06:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]