User talk:Tiggerjay/Archives 2013
SorryI didn't check your userpage before I deleted your edits. I just assumed it was either another sock or a WP:WEASEL edit. I will add it back for you.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
ACCHi Tiggerjay! I'm just popping by to remind you that you still have ACC request 87166 reserved. I just wanted to make sure you're aware of it. Best, MJ94 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC) RM ClosureRegarding your edit here, please see WP:RMCI regarding proper closing procedures. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 23:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Ahem. Is this how you, acting as the closing "administrator", determine consensus? Please explain how this edit was made in good faith. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Copy Edit ErrorI would like to clarify that the edit I made (which you suggest is malicious) not only accidentally removed your comment, and 1 oppose; but also 2 supports - if this was intentional to skew the results in favor of a move, then it would have made sense to keep the supported, but as you can see they were also inadvertently removed. I'm not sure there is much more I can do to help make that more clear... Tiggerjay (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Discussion regarding parenthetical disambiguationI understand you think that this was moved improperly and you raise a good point that there is a wider implication here. Perhaps someone is doing unhelpful things by bringing up multiple move requests on multiple pages instead of keeping them consolidated in a single location. The move closure was based on what appeared to be good consensus on the page, because ever !vote was in support of the moving of the proposed 3 pages. Do you somehow see the vote or discussion going any other direction? Tiggerjay (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hmm....You have to click "Move" in the main page, NOT the talk page (as you did with the Nine O'clock News article), to move a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSH-alive (talk • contribs)
ACC Barnstar
Hello Tiggerjay. Thanks for your contribution to the Move discussion!
Can you spell out how this would work? I was about to do the requested move, since enough time has passed, but it sounds like you have a different idea. EdJohnston (talk) 20:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
ApologyI have reverted the speedy - simply have left as redirect - also your thoughtful edit is to be complimented - the least left in open space th better - cheers SatuSuro 08:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
make it like a celebrity pagehow do you make like what the celebrities do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jo price (talk • contribs) 18:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thanks for helping methank you for helping me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jo price (talk • contribs) 19:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Progress on WP:Snuggle and work logI've been making some progress on Snuggle development recently and I could use your feedback. Specifically, I've created a work log that I plan to update every time I get a chance to work on Snuggle. My intention is that you'll be able to watch that page to track my progress so I can get your feedback on features when they are early in development. The most recent entry (also the only entry) discusses new functionality for interacting with newcomers via Snuggle. I posted some mockups in the work log that show how I imagine the new features to work and I could use some feedback before I start writing the code. Thanks! --EpochFail(talk • work) 20:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC) Optical Express TalkHi, I have posted a few comments requesting a review by independent editors of an edit that you made at the start of 2013. I would appreciate if you could take a look when you get a second, please. Thanks. Hardlygone (talk) 10:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
River LeeI have expanded my opposition there. Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 19:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Proposal to move Range (mathematics) to Range of a functionI see that you closed the (stale) proposal to move Range (mathematics) to Range of a function with the result "No consensus". I humbly suggest that there is in fact some sort of consensus to perform that move, with one explicit supporting !vote, two implicit supporting !votes, and one "Neutral" !vote. I have left a comment to that effect at Talk:Range (mathematics)#Proposal to move - current title is too ambiguous. — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 10:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Adoption RequestI Wish to be adopted by u. i have been acting as a Wikipedia editor for quite some time now but i am not able to perform which i like to if i am adopted by u i think i will be able to learn a lot from u.hope i get a positive reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaveenGanesan (talk • contribs) 07:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC) Move review for Range (mathematics)An editor has asked for a Move review of Range (mathematics). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Tobias Bergemann (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Article moveWas not really good support for the move of epidemiology of teenage pregnancy per the discussion here [1]. Not really a big deal either way. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Norwegian Scientific IndexGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Norwegian Scientific Index. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 February 2013
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 7 March 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:FordGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ford. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 04 March 2013
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
I'd appreciate your comments ... you'll see why when you read it ... and if you'd rather reply here or on my talk page, that works, too. - Dank (push to talk) 20:14, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Gift economyGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gift economy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC) A cookie for you!
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject TemplatesGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 March 2013
We'd like your opinionA question for people who commented in the RfC at "Probationary Period" and "Not Unless". (Or feel free to reply on my talk page, if you prefer.) - Dank (push to talk) 19:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 March 2013
Please comment on Talk:Charlize TheronGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charlize Theron. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC) ACR #96919Can you get back to this person about her account request? She emailed OTRS asking for help, confused that she shares a name with someone famous, or that she's not allowed to use her last name as part of her user name. Can't she just register the name? I don't see any collisions between what she's chosen and something in article space. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Up for AdoptionWell I just read this Page here regarding you wanting to adoptee? Are you actually open for mentoring?--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 10:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 01 April 2013
Please comment on Talk:George MaharisGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:George Maharis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC) Project for RfA nominatorsAs one of the supporters of a related proposal in the 2013 RfC on RfA reform, you are invited to join the new WikiProject for RfA nominators. Please come and help shape this initiative. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 08 April 2013
Please comment on Talk:Simon WiesenthalGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simon Wiesenthal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC) There's no opposition to the guideline-based reasons to move there. The assertion that this is a primary topic was not contested; Vegaswikian ignored it, and focused on partial title matches, which are irrelevant to the discussion, and SmokeyJoe objected to the wider consensus that resulted in the Article titles policy. This should probably be closed (or relisted again) by an administrator. Peter James (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Karma(L|l)oopHello! Per your request at RFPP, I unprotected Karmaloop and moved the article. However, I moved it to KarmaLoop as the company's website uses that capitalization, but the rest of the article seems to prefer a lower-case 'l'. If there's any consensus against using the camelcased variant feel free to change it to the lower-case alternative. Regards, m.o.p 06:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC) I immediately removed "John" from the title per WP:NCBOOKS. --George Ho (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Are there flaws in arguments? --George Ho (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Your contribution to my talk page.I absolutely agree with all the terms of Wikipedia that you pointed out and all my actions are in absolute accordance with all the rules and terms. Please be so kind to read more of the comments on the Talk-page of the article about Robby Robinson to get more informed about the main problems of the discussion. Thank you very much. RRWM (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Thanks! Tiggerjay (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Please helpDear Tiggerjay, could you please check the talk page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robby_Robinson_(bodybuilder) and help to achieve fairness in materials put on article about Robby Robinson? I would like to hear your opinion if you also support that within a couple of days an article about a famous bodybuilding legend turned out into an article about a ... I do not even have words. All the previous contributions were deleted, not only those from me, and new ones are presented so misleading that people who know Mr Robinson and his life and achievements will never believe this is an article about him. To eliminate the previous misanderstanding, I transferred the opinion of concerned person, without any actual connection to me. Thak you. RRWM (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC) WP:BRDI have repeated your removal of Fyunck's addition see Talk:Frédéric Vitoux (tennis). Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sanctions against IranGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sanctions against Iran. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 13 May 2013
Adopt MeDear Tiggerjay, Would you be able to adopt me? Regards, Anjumodgil (talk) 13:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:WikipediaGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wikipedia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 20 May 2013
Optical ExpressHi, there are some recent edits by COI editors directly on Optical Express page. I have posted a comment on the Optical Express Talk Page and would be grateful if you could review when you get a spare moment. Thanks. Hardlygone (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Kiss Kiss Bang BangGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 27 May 2013
Please comment on Talk:Alicia SilverstoneGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alicia Silverstone. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 6 June 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 05 June 2013
Please comment on Talk:Hans-Hermann HoppeGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 12 June 2013
WP:Snuggle is live at snuggle.grouplens.orgSnuggle, the newcomer socialization tool I've been building, is finally ready for general use. All you need to do to get started is point your browser to https://snuggle.grouplens.org. Let me know if you run into any trouble. I'll be watching WT:Snuggle. Or you can also just contact me directly. Thanks for your patience. See also:
--EpochFail(talk • work) 19:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Managing a "move" from an external wiki into WikipediaHi Tiggerjay: my organization oversees the largest global community of marine debris managers, researchers, and activists. As a new service to them, we are building a user-friendly wiki on our site that will be closely managed by a hand-picked team of 5-6 marine debris experts. We are starting our wiki with the article on "marine debris" in Wikipedia as of July 1, and we would like to upload our wiki back to Wikipedia on a regular basis, perhaps once a month. Essentially we would like to manage a "move", but with the content coming from a wiki outside of Wikipedia, and with that external content replacing the content on Wikipedia at the time of the move. My questions are: 1. Is this allowed on Wikipedia? 2. If it is allowed, do I and my organization need to go through an approval process? 3. If it is not allowed, is there a work-around that would largely have the same end result: i.e., ensuring that Wikipedia continually has the most up-to-date content on marine debris from the people most familiar with it? Your question for me may be, "Why not just do your marine debris wiki on Wikipedia and save yourself the move step?" My answer is that Wikipedia is fairly user-unfriendly for the average person, and our external wiki will make the process much more accessible to the people who know the most about marine debris. Thanks very much. Marinedebrisinfo (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 19 June 2013
Please comment on Talk:Laura RobsonGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Laura Robson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 26 June 2013
Please comment on Talk:Alger HissGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alger Hiss. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 03 July 2013
Please comment on Talk:Margaret MutuGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Margaret Mutu. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 10 July 2013
Please comment on Talk:SkyDriveGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SkyDrive. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC) IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle usersHi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail(talk • work), Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
Please comment on Talk:Murray RothbardGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Optical ExpressHi, I have posted a message on the Optical Express talk page re POV editors breaching previous agreement around consensus and direct edits. I would appreciate if you could visit and comment. Thanks. --Hardlygone (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 24 July 2013
Please comment on Talk:Davison Design & DevelopmentGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Davison Design & Development. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Happy Birthday
BenisonPBaby 13:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 31 July 2013
Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversiesGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 07 August 2013
ACC AccessHello. I've suspended your ACC access as you've been inactive on the tool for 45 days or more. When you return, should you want your access back, poke me and I'll be more than happy to restore it. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Prince George of CambridgeGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prince George of Cambridge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 August 2013
Please comment on Talk:MythologyGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mythology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC) An article about Caren Z. TurnerHello, I noticed that an Wikipedia article about Caren Z. Turner was deleted. I think she is a notable person in the American politics and worth having an article about her. So I wrote a very concise article myself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Endiruna/sandbox I am writing to you as I think it would be deleted if I would have tried to publish it myself.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 21 August 2013
Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversiesGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Hello, sorry for disturbing you, I contacted you some days ago requesting help to publish http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Endiruna/sandbox and I was curious about your thoughts. Of course there is no hurry, so take your time. Best wishes, endiruna
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
Interview request: Your interactions with new editorsI'm contacting you about a study that I'm running with TheOriginalSoni exploring newcomer mentorship activities in Wikipedia. I'd like to ask you a few questions about your interactions with newcomers and to explore how a tool like WP:Snuggle might make your work easier. The interview and demo session will take 30 minutes to an hour depending on how much time we spend discussing things. If you're interested, let me know. If not, disregard this message and I won't bother you again.
Thanks for your consideration. --EpochFail (talk • contribs) 15:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 04 September 2013
The Signpost: 11 September 2013
Please comment on Talk:Santiago B. VillafaniaGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Santiago B. Villafania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 September 2013
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
The Signpost: 02 October 2013
The Signpost: 09 October 2013
Optical ExpressHi. I'm aware that you have had previous dealings with the Optical Express wiki article. I would appreciate if, as a neutral editor, you could visit my recent requests on the Talk page and give your thoughts. Thanks --Hardlygone (talk) 09:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 16 October 2013
The Signpost: 23 October 2013
the Ask.com morning questionDo your nails and hair grow after you die? A) is incorrect. Hair and fingernails do not continue to grow after a person dies. Rather, the skin dries and shrinks away from the bases of hairs and nails, giving the appearance of growth. This is from Wikipedia and it is wrong... and I know first hand. Years ago, when much younger I was married to a man named Harvey. He died 4 months later as the result of a car accident, however he lived for 13 days. He suffered horrible brain damage. During the course of his long brain surgery, when medical specialists attempted to save his life, they saved his head. After he died his hair had grown enough, by the time of the funeral, that he literally looked normal, not shaved. Also his fingernails had to be trimmed! Therefore I feel your Wikipedia answer is not correct! I hope I got this to the right place, hard to figure out where to leave a Wikipedia comment, sorry if I bothered you. Salanda salandah@ymail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.3.179 (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 23 October 2013
the Ask.com morning questionDo your nails and hair grow after you die? A) is incorrect. Hair and fingernails do not continue to grow after a person dies. Rather, the skin dries and shrinks away from the bases of hairs and nails, giving the appearance of growth. This is from Wikipedia and it is wrong... and I know first hand. Years ago, when much younger I was married to a man named Harvey. He died 4 months later as the result of a car accident, however he lived for 13 days. He suffered horrible brain damage. During the course of his long brain surgery, when medical specialists attempted to save his life, they saved his head. After he died his hair had grown enough, by the time of the funeral, that he literally looked normal, not shaved. Also his fingernails had to be trimmed! Therefore I feel your Wikipedia answer is not correct! I hope I got this to the right place, hard to figure out where to leave a Wikipedia comment, sorry if I bothered you. Salanda salandah@ymail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.3.179 (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 30 October 2013
The Signpost: 06 November 2013
The Signpost: 13 November 2013
The Signpost: 20 November 2013
Please comment on an RfC about Living members of deposed royal families and the titles attributed to them on WPHello - I have opened an RfC about suggested guidelines in the Manual of Style for articles about living members of families whose ancestors were deposed as monarchs of various countries and the titles and "styles" attributed to these living people, at the moment often in a misleading and inaccurate way in my opinion. Please join in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies "Use of royal "Titles and styles" and honorific prefixes in articles and templates referring to pretenders to abolished royal titles and their families"[2]Regards,Smeat75 (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC) New ArticleHow do I create an article that is a type of another article subject? 3.14Master (talk) 19:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 04 December 2013
The Signpost: 11 December 2013
The Signpost: 18 December 2013
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia