You do not have permission to do that, for the following reason:
Your user name or IP address has been blocked. The block was made by FT2. The reason given is This IP range is blocked to prevent vandalism. If you are one of the bona fide users on this IP range, and affected by this, please request unblocking, and ask for checkuser and IP block exemption.
Start of block: 18:48, May 13, 2008
Expiry of block: 18:48, May 13, 2008
Intended blockee:
You can contact FT2 or another administrator to discuss the block. You cannot use the 'e-mail this user' feature unless a valid e-mail address is specified in your account preferences and you have not been blocked from using it.
Your current IP address is 91.108.201.169, and the block ID is #. Please include either or both of these in any queries.
Is this an error, as I am signed in and the block ID is showing as "#".
My IP address is also blocked for editing and creation of new accounts. It's blocked on Firefox as well as IE6, so it is not a software problem. I can not talk to FT2 because I can not edit their page. I have not vandalled anything and my user should not be blocked. Can someone please explain. Tholly (talk)
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit without disruption.
I have asked the blocking admin for information. What has happened is the IP range that you edit from has been blocked due to a very prolific vandal and disruptive editor. You have not been blocked directly and this is not a software problem. Sorry for the inconvenience this has caused. A checkuser should be along to sort this soon. Regards. Woody (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I understand that blocking vandalising IP addresses is good, I am just frustrated that it also blocked my user, which shares the IP. Tholly (talk) 16:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would you care to explain how this constitutes vandalism? Before you leave any more disruptive templates on my (or anyone's) talk page please read the warning in large red letters at the top of it... — iridescent18:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied on your talk page. Sorry.
As you clearly state at the top of your talk page:
If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it.
If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here, so make sure you watch this page.
So why did you leave a message on my talk page about this at 18:44, when I had replied to one on yours at 18:31? It wasn't a very complete answer which I later added to but there was no need to contact me here too. - tholly--Turnip--20:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because I can see from your edit that you added it using Huggle, which (unlike Twinkle) doesn't auto-watch the tag pages it adds its driveby "vandalism" tags to. Given that you'd patently not read my talkpage - or you'd have seen that more than 50% of it is currently taken up by discussion with the author of Huggle on what can be done to curb this kind of misuse of it - it's reasonable to assume that you hadn't read the notice at the top, either. — iridescent21:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tholly. I appreciate you welcoming new users - its a good thing to do. However, could I ask you to check their contributions first? I notice that you've recently warned a couple of users (User:Mario7083 and User:Ekant20), who had vandalized articles before you welcomed them. In these cases its generally more important to revert the vandalism and warn the user than it is to welcome them. Thanks, Gwernol11:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is NOT promotional material and i don't need to read anything. Ive read all the making article stuff over three times. Ive made 6 articles and youve deleted them all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matigues (talk • contribs) 20:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i hate you
STOP DELETING MY ARTICLES. I HATE YOU. I HATE YOU. IM JUST TRYING TO MAKE AN ARTICLE AND YOU KEEP DELETING IT. IM GETTING REALLY PISSED OFF PLEASE LET ME HAVE A DAMN ARTICLE. --Matigues (talk) 21:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't me on all of them (I think) - I only did it once. And I'm not deleting the article, only marking it for deletion. Anyway, it was content inappropriate for Wikipedia - it was just an essay reflecting your personal views. - tholly--Turnip--21:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
how was the content inappropriate. I was telling people how to stop warming not telling them which product to buy. I was giving my opinion for people to see and maybe take into effect to save the earth before we screw the planet Matigues (talk) 21:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the Wikipedia guidelines on having a neutral point of view. As you said, you were giving your own opinion. If you wish to do this, you can do so in your own user space, but not as a main encyclopaedia page. If you wish to restore this page to somewhere in your user pages, contact an administrator who can email users copies of deleted pages.
Also, I'm obviously not alone in thinking that the article should be deleted, as I only tagged it for deletion. An administrator then looked at it and deleted it. - tholly--Turnip--16:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have contacted Wackymacs about his oppose, but I don't think he is online right now. So, if you've got time, please feel free to weigh in on the discussion; I'd like to get feedback on the current method I am using to determine whether companies should be listed or not. GaryKing (talk)15:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, my edit to this page was an attempt to clarify that the central plot of Bamboozled was born out of the black executive's disillusionment with the state of television in his day. Thus, the inclusion of the word "disgruntled" in necessary, as it lets the reader know that his use of blackface in his new television idea was a result of his own cynicism. I am adding it back. 70.189.70.188 (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am taking a semi-wikibreak for the summer, as in real life I will be on holiday for large parts of it. As a result, I may not respond swiftly to queries.
Unblock request on simple wiki
Hello, I am one of the administrators from the Simple English Wikipedia. Your request for unblock has been granted, and the IP will be re-blocked on 4 July, or after you create your account, whichever is earlier. If you have any problems, please feel free to email me or contact other administrators on this list. Cheers, ChenzwTalk08:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's worked. I did try to contact one of the admins on Simple wiki, but I could not edit their talk page while I was blocked, so had to ask someone here. Thanks again, - tholly--Turnip--15:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shazam (service), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Remove Speedy Delete on The Sociology of Radical Islam
Hello Jack, I am writing to request that you remove the speedy delete request from my article. With the help of other users I have made the changes required by Wikipedia and added references and links that substantiate my article. Please let me know if you I need to do anything else.
Thanks, Bizhan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazmnovin (talk • contribs) 01:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the speedy deletion tag on Sociology of Radical Islam has been removed. Another user (User:CultureDrone) has put on an AfD tag which requires people to to vote on deletion. Have your say on this here.
I was adding the CSD using twinkle, which put it there automatically. At the time I didn't know that it had survived a Afd as there and there was no information about this on the talk page. It had very little content and was suitable for an A7 CSD. - tholly--Turnip--17:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huggle feedback
Hi there. The issue that you participated in has been archive to try to keep the feed back page tidy and is now located here. To see the current bug report on this issue please go here If you would like to query me about this please send me a message on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks. ·Add§hore·Talk/Cont15:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.
When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.
If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold(t/a/c)03:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. —— RyanLupin • (talk)21:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have enabled this flag on your account. Please note it may be removed at any time by any administrator should you no longer need it, or cease to participate in the account creation process. Cheers. WilliamH (talk)16:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher!
You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Swanmore College Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swanmore College Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, Tholly! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Tholly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:Swanmore College Logo.png
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Swanmore College Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
