This is an archive of past discussions with User:ThinkBlue. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Difficult for me also. I probably haven't mentioned this, but I am in 8th grade, taking 11th grade biology, 11th grade math, 9th grade english, and 9th grade social studies. Too much to do! But I frequently get free time on the weekdays (like today). iMatthew200823:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
It's called Biology for some reason. I thought it was chemistry or something else but they call it Bio. Thanks for the props. (I'm getting it from everyone today, lol). It really is hard for me though. I'm maintaining a 90 average in math, a 95 in both history and english, and an 85 in biology. and in my first year of spanish, I'm keeping a 100 average. =] And I guess we should give him time before we make major decisions about kicking him out. SexyiMatthew200823:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
No, I'm thirteen, but got the job at 12. And they don't offer AP classes until next year for me. Right now, their all honors. SexyiMatthew200823:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
My teachers are encouraging me too. They think I'll do well. I'll have to put some serious thought into it. Anyway, it would be cool with me if you were "SexyThinkBlue." You should add it to your signature. SexyiMatthew200823:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
GRRRR. I just typed the whole entire event section, and POOF, my computer decided to restart. This sucks. I'll re-do it, just not tonight, maybe tomorrow. SexyiMatthew200801:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
It's 8:30. I'll make a deal with you though. I'll re-write the WHOLE thing, without the internal links if you add the internal links when I'm done writing it. SexyiMatthew200801:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm confused. The only thing deleted was the event section, not the background section. I'm saying I will re-write the event section but without internal links if you would add them for me. SexyiMatthew200801:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm done writing the basics of the event. It might need to be expanded a little bit more, and the links need to be added. It also might need a bit of revising. SexyiMatthew200802:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I'm getting off for today. I'm very tired. All of my school work and stuff, plus writing Unforgiven 03's event twice. Plus we all became "Sexy!" lol. SexyiMatthew200802:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok, Night. And I thought you were using the "SexyBlue". I think we should give Hybrid a "Random Act of Kindness" barnstar for tonight. (If you don't want to do it, I'll do it tomorrow). SexyiMatthew200802:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for being so patient. I think we can start expanding Bad Blood today. I wanted to inform you that I will work on the feud between Shawn Michaels and Triple H. LAX, will work on another feud and the aftermath. Do you mind working on the event? ZenlaxTCS19:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Theres like 2 or 4 matchs havent been completed, because I need some rest its like 2 am now, but am always ready tommoro, I hope I did one hell of a job! Check it out NimiTize06:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. ;) BTW, do you think we could split the aftermath section for Bad Blood between us? --Sexy LAX02:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I see. I am actually thinking about removing the "Sexy" from my sig. IMO, it doesn't sound right or look professional. --Sexy LAX02:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks good for me, give me the job for BackLash and am on it, today I just got the internet back and workin, yesterday it went off like always NimiTize12:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
--Finished up in the Event, although I wasent able to expand the HBK vs Randy match and the Jon. and AL vs JR and Jerry, sorry. There still might be some cleanup, but if you want you can gimme the job for Backlash and ill start working on it. NimiTize18:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, actually I'm working on it in my Sandbox, if you want to take a look at it, am looking for reliable sources, and WWE.com is not helping me, do you have any good reliable sources? NimiTize23:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Yea its cool, you work with the HBK and hogan feud. Cause I know HBK your fav. wrestler ;) and so is mine, lol :) NimiTize23:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I might need some help, If your not busy with anything else. I looked at some of the Background sections in the articles you linked me, I keep getting the wrong idea of writing it out. Can you please help me out, I stuck between my homework and this. But, am done with my homework kinda, I just need help on this, Backlash. NimiTize01:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me out, I actually got the idea now, I want to get atleast up to half of the event done (I doubt that I can do that though) by my offtime. NimiTize02:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
If he/she wants to create it, mabye we should wait, because we need to put alot of info into what we are working on in my sandbox Hope that made sense NimiTize02:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I don't really know, its up to you, well my idea was to work on like half of the Backlash 2005 in my sandbox, then make it into a article. If you want to do it differently thats fine by me. NimiTize03:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
KK, so its by sandbox, I also told Cimmo not to make it, and if he wants to check out the work kept up by me and you, he can always feel free to check out my Sandbox. NimiTize03:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
You would make a perfect admin! Just like LAX, as a matter of fact, I was thinking about Nominating you, do you think your ready to be admin? NimiTize04:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Like I said to LAX, its too long and it really doesnt flow. And I just want a change.(U like my WWE Promo?..lol)--TrUCo931101:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Yep just like that. Oh boy, another one? I thought we agreed for no more members, (while I have nothing against NimiTize) but if he/she joins they need to really contribute to PPV, unlike SPAC--TrUCo931102:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
As I also have nothing against NimiTize, I would have to say no, because we made a clear decision that we were not accepting any new members. To avoid this, maybe we should have a section on the page "Our Friends" that lists friends of the group, who occasionally may help out with some projects, but are not a member. iMatthew200802:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well Matt, NimiTize is actually helping out, unlike SPAC, so I say yes. But absolutely, we have to reach consensus that there shall be no new members after NimiTize.TrUCo931102:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
As I do understand that, my opinion will not change (as of now). Last time we said "we must agree, no more members after whomever" and then we always make exceptions. I need to stick to my word this time. I'm sorry. iMatthew200802:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree, he/she is a great help, but we closed openings last time, and I can't dig deep enough to pull out a yes. But if the vote is 4-1, then I guess he/she is in. iMatthew200802:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I have absolutely nothing against NimiTize, and I think he is a very helpful editor, but my opinion is that we should have no new members. iMatthew200803:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Bad Blood
If its alright with you, I've decided to post-pone Bad Blood. My reason for the hold is that I've still haven't finished Backlash and I would like to finish it, before I move on to a new project. I hope you can understand. ZenlaxTCS21:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
We ask NimiTize to help us finish these projects, and judging by his edits, we can make a decision on whether we want him in the Kliq, or we don't. iMatthew200822:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm cannot finish Vengeance. I either need to find somebody to do the aftermath and background, or take it off of the PPV list, and let somebody else finish expanding it at a later date. I need help with it, and I can't seem to find any. iMatthew200801:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I would say yes. But, I do not understand the aftermath sections. I can never tell what is notable and what is not. iMatthew200801:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
You still want me to work on the Kane/McMahon feud? BTW, this weekend I plan on finishing Unforgiven, so I'll probably have some time to clean up the event section myself. --Cheers, LAX01:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
iMatthew has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
I agree, although the event does need some cleanup before nominating for GA status (no offense to NimiTize). --Cheers, LAX01:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
IDK. I told him to trim it down some, and even gave him an example (SummerSlam (2007)) of what it should look like. I'll try to re-write it (if I can) sometime this weekend. --Cheers, LAX02:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Wrestling has been a major part of my life for the past 6 years. I feel expand the TNA ppv's. Another thing is im always on wikipedia S-PAC5405:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Tiptoetytalk is wishing you a Happy Valentine's Day, ThinkBlue! This greeting promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Zenlax is wishing you a Happy Valentine's Day, {{subst:kdBASEPAGENAME}}! This greeting promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
I have a WikiForce SmashBros Subpage which needs to be deleted since WikiForce SmashBros has been created. How do you delete it? Happy Valentines Day ThinkBlue.Smashbrosboy(talk)
I Just Thought We Might Have Needed A New section. ;) It looks way better than before, but you still have that problem with listing how the superstars won, like via pinfall/submission. If you add that, then you will be set.--TrUCo931101:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Check out the Kliq's new calendar (example at least) here. Make changes or do whatever you want. If it's good, I will post it The Kliq's page. iMatthew200801:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I covered the main feud, but I can't find enough info to cover a second feud. Im guessing the DX vs The Nation feud, but if you read the results from that link I gave you I tried to find info there but idk i may have overlooked it, u can try if you want.TrUCo931103:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
It's alright, just leave it. I will try to do it tomorrow, or get Zenlax to do it as he is supposed to be helping me.TrUCo931103:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, well you see that feud really doesnt begin with all stable members feuding, like read during the May results and read the OTE results and mayby you can see it.--TrUCo931103:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Alright, will do. I'm good right now. I had alot added to RR '01, but I had accidentally closed the page without saving my progress, so all my info was deleted. --LAX00:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Blue, can you do me a huge favor. I need somebody to check on my userpage at least once every two days, and make sure that it hasn't been vandalized. Can you do this for me? iMatthew200820:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Also, can you message me on my talk page at least once or twice while I'm gone, to keep my updated on what is happening, instead of me running around like a lost child, trying to catch up when I come back. iMatthew200801:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
For reverting that crap on the Glen Jacobs page. PCE constantly makes minor edits that do nothing good and/or screw up links and make the article sound horrible. I couldn't revert again either due to the 3RR. I left a message on his talk page, but he's been warned before. Same thing with RLipstock. I digress, anyway, thanks. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hehe, yeah that is. I still read it once in a while when I'm feeling down. It makes me laugh so hard I forget why I felt bad in the first place. I'm glad I found that one. And then there was the Chris Masters edit I made, with the edit summary of "Revert to last food revision." Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I was working on WrestleMania 23. My end of it is pretty much complete. DMN agreed to go ahead and source it. I'm not really much help with PPVs, since I don't actually see most of them. I think Mania 23 is the only one I that I saw that I managed to jump on before anyone else did. Meh, I am seeing NWO and WM24 though. Anyway, I have been sweeping through PPV articles done by others and adding and fixing wikilinks, so I help out how I can. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, it was tough work. I spaced it out and only did a few matche sections a week. It took me I think two months to finish it, as it's easy to get burned out. Anyway, yeah, I hate redirects and tend to fix any and all I see, to the point I sometimes sweep articles just to get rid of them. A lot of times there's things that should be linked that aren't and others that are overlinked. So it's just a bunch of minor stuff, but it makes the articles better. I would prefer to stick to reverting vandalism, but I thought I'd try my hand at WM23. If I can get it GA or FA, maybe I'll work on another PPV if there's one I've actually seen that no one's working on. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. :) I think it's almost good enough to pass once it's sourced. I may take it to the League of Copyeditors or ask for a Peer Review first. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you want me to do it now? I kinda am tired, I wrote the entire OTE in 2 days, and kinda tired. Is it ok if i do it tommorow?--TrUCo931101:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, It doesn't matter to me. As long as I have the sources ready and all i have to do is write the event section and source it with the available sources.TrUCo931102:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, idk, but I think NWO 07 needs work, like the event section. As that was my second PPV, i need to shorten it a bit. Then I will nominate it for GA, as it has alot of sourcing and info. IF you keep following my advice for all your Unforgivens, then they are also future GA's.TrUCo931103:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Just thought a new thread would be nice. :) No, since (IMO) it wasn't a major feud. Also, do you think an image of Kurt Angle bald would work in the RR '01 article (considering he wasn't bald at the time)? --LAX14:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Probably just the Guerrero/Angle feud. BTW, could you please read over the background for the Rumble and tell me what you think? Thanks. --LAX00:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks good so far, except for the lead sentence in the second paragraph in the background section. To me, "The second main feud" just doesn't right. --LAX01:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I realized that, It just sounds a little wonky to me. No I'm not, even though I wish I was. Are you? --LAX01:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there anyone working on No Way OUt 2008, if not, I want to write the event section after Im done writing the Royal RUmble 97 event section.--TrUCo931117:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I started with the Rumble right now, all you have to do is source it. Im getting the info from Online Onslaught, but Idk if you ref named it or not. So just do the sourcing.TrUCo931117:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
It looks good, for the Nitro/Hardy match you need to specify how nitro pinned him. Also you should combine some sentences as the paragraph would flow better if you combined them. You'red doing good you just need to specify some moves, and the result, and watch out for tenses (keep it in past).TrUCo931118:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
It was better than the Rumble. I like the Big Show/Mayweather confrontaton. I thought the SD/ECW Chamber was redundant, it made no sense. There wasn't that much action like in the RAW chamber. But overall I give it a 4/5.--TrUCo931118:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Yep, how do you think the Big Show TOC should be ordered? There is an edit war whether we should put it under the WWE section, or move it to a new one, i think it should go under the WWE. --TrUCo931118:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
That sucks. Anyway, I am working on the feuds, but I would really like to finish RR '01 first. But if you would like for me to finish SummerSlam first, then I will. --LAX19:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Trust me, I won't, although I do want to finish it; I still have to work on Backlash as well. --LAX20:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
No thanks; right now I'm writing the event section. Do you think I should include another feud in the background section? --LAX20:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
That's funny, 'cause I was thinking of the E&C/Dudleys feud. But, I think I'll just leave it as is since we both seem to have a difference of opinion. --LAX20:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
It looks great, just one thing. Where triple H "nailed" McMahon with the sledgehammer, you want to say it professionally like "hitting". Also when you want to use the same person's name more than once, you go by their last name, like McMahon, Cena, or for abbreviations like for Triple H, you put their abb. in parentheses (HHH). Other than that its great!--TrUCo931121:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Fixing the formatting on the citations. Some need authors, accessdates, dates, etc, etc.
I have a list of interviews and articles that I want to use in referencing the article.
It is not far off from being a GA. It can probably be nominated at the end of the two weeks if all of the above is accomplished. Nikki31104:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Vengeance
Blue, if its alright with you, I'd like to finish Vengeance, as I've seen that you've been working on it and wouldn't want you to go through all the work alone. ZenlaxTCS19:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Now, before I remove the under construction template, is there anything else that needs to be added to the article? ZenlaxTCS20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah that would be good, but in the process you have to say what happened to Edge like did he feud with someone else or something?TrUCo9311 22:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)?TrUCo931122:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, my bad. I thought Kane was feuding with Matt, but yeah Edge and Matt would be notable. But would happen to Kane though?TrUCo931122:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Well like in Over the Edge (1998), I kinda explain the feud in detail, but if you want just say how Matt got involved and continue it until when Matt was sent to SmackDown! but you don't have to include every detail in between. About RR'97, Im not sure what happened after the event. Remember that link I gave you {The Other Arena} look in the 97 year after the RR 97 date, cuz they dont have the results for the RR.TrUCo931123:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Well remove the fact that Austin was the first RR winner to not get a WM title match, that's kinda trivial. Also try to merge some sentences and was the thursday Raw really called Thursday Raw Thurday?TrUCo931123:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
IDK about this one. When you think about it, he lost. Why add it? But then again, that is his most recent major event, I say you can add it. But its already in the article, I would just reword it.--TrUCo931123:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The funniest thing is that he has a box that says he helped get NWO '04 to GA status. Anyway, Hardy and Kane continued their feud after SummerSlam? --LAX00:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
What about this? ----> The feud between Edge and Kane came to an end when Edge was put in an angle with Matt Hardy. On the July 11 edition of Raw, Hardy made a surprising appearance, interfering in a match between Edge and Kane. The following week, as both Edge and Lita were walking towards the ring before a scheduled Steel Cage match against Kane, Hardy attacked Edge from behind. --LAX01:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Everything is indeed in place. I've removed the template from the article. I wanted to let you know that I will put up Vengeance up for a peer review, I hope that's alright with you. ZenlaxTCS19:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh that was just a part of the comment about last names, like with people who have abbreviated names like HHH and MVP you want to put their full name in the first sentence of the match and then next to it in parantheses you can put the abbr. Then you can use the abbr. later on.--TrUCo931101:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Exactly, but make sure you put somewhere that HHH means Triple H, you never know, ppl might not understand abbr.--TrUCo931101:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Well in that case, you dont. But you still you can either say June 6, 2005 edition of RAw or June 6 edition of Raw. with out wikilinking it. Feel me?--TrUCo931101:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hahaha..im flattered..Im not the only one though who knows about PPVs, DMN knows alot as well. Too bad he left the Kliq.--TrUCo931101:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
It works, just changed the "for" in the first sentence to "over", sounds better and flows. Also do you want to write out the whole date or just keep it with out the "year"? Also you dont necessarily have to say "battling". And then it works.--TrUCo931102:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I do, because readers you know might forget that the year is the (????) one in parenthesis, so I write it in case. Mostly like in WrestleMania articles.--TrUCo931102:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
No, lol...I watched WMXIX though,(my first PPV!!) but I didnt have TNN back then. But I haven't watched half of the PPV's I have completed..TrUCo931102:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I saw some of that PPV, I remember Kane throwing Shane from the top of the set (if im correct). And the BG section looks good so far. Good Job!--TrUCo931103:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, don't worry. Most of the time for PPV's they just ask u to clearly state what happened in the BG, and they look for other tech errors, and if the info reads well, and has sources. Other times they ask you to fix some MoS errors and thats it. Just look at the GA review for NWO 04.TrUCo931104:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Thats good, all that matters is that ur ok..I think you should ask Chronic to like make u a cool userpage, with a theme.--TrUCo931115:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Wanted to inform you that I've added the Michaels and Angle feud to the background. Make any changes, if they are needed. Also, what article did you have in mind to expand? ZenlaxTCS20:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
You can have it. I'll probably just do one or two feuds for the background. BTW, could you please start working on the event section for SummerSlam '04, if it's not a problem. --LAX23:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
He is just about impossible to talk to. Every warning left on his talk page, he has ignored, including the warnings about his userpage. What matches would you like me to write? --LAX02:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
May I please do that in about an hour, I'm currently watching SmackDown!. Also, what I think the automated peer review was trying to say was, when full dates are in the article, link everything; not include the full date. (I don't know if that made any sense, but...) --LAX02:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. I would say: The first match that aired was a six-man tag team match between Team A and Team B. --LAX02:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Nothing much really. Palumbo defeated a jobber, Benjamin qualified for the MitB match, Khali faced off against Kane (I missed this match), and coming up is Batista versus MVP. --LAX02:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Alright cool. I'll get started on Unforgiven tomorrow (sorry for saying later tonight; right now I feel like getting off). --LAX03:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes he did. I chose to become his friend again as long as he takes a wikibreak instead of vandalizing when he gets stressed out. Also, please don't edit Unforgiven. I'm currently doing major cleanup including rewriting the Golberg/HHH feud. --LAX16:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Nope. This was discussed when Cena was booed at SummerSlam (2007), and WrestleMania 23 and 22. This is not an uncommon thing. --LAX16:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk page, because I am reformatting the table in like another article (but im not saving it) just a test edit. But show me on my talk page.--TrUCo931116:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Actually, mayby you dont have to format it because look at my sandbox now and look at the table, does it look good, or do you think I could still decrease the size of the columns?--TrUCo931117:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Now Im finding out they had a supplemental draft over WWE.com, but I dont know in what order they chose the wrestlers. From #19-30.--TrUCo931117:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Blue, you've just made my day. Thank you very much. Right now I reading to (finally) expand the background for SummerSlam. --LAX18:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Alright, but would you like me to work on the entire background, or would you like to split it up between us? I really do not want to get involved in the dispute. IMO, both are fine and there's no reason to start such a big dispute over it. --LAX02:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
That's fine with me. Do you think the Goldberg/HHH feud is pretty much done, or do you think it could use some more info? --LAX02:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
He hasn't been editing for about an hour now and has since stopped. If he makes another edit like he's been doing, I will block him since he has been warned several times with no intention of listening. --LAX03:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Was Orton interfering in the match between Michaels and Flair at Bad Blood what started the feud between Orton and Michaels? --LAX14:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
I know that, but when I was reading, I didn't find anything that happened in between or after that. What should I do? --LAX00:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
speedy
please don't nominate professional football players for deletion by speedy. That they have played in a professional league of any sort is an assertion of at least minimal importance. if you think it not enough for notability, adf is where to test it. DGG (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
NiciVampireHeart has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
I'm very proud indeed. I've added you to my wikifriends section by the way! Feel free to revert if you secretly hate me or something! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 01:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I made a new section because the other one was to long, and I had a question. Did you happen to know by any chance, what was the tagline for Backlash 2005? NimiTize02:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh sorry for bothering you hope its ok, ill take a look at it right now. I also have to notify Wikipedia that my notice bar does not show up when I have new messages. NimiTize03:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
There are some things that you need to watch out for, try not to write the BG in present tense as i saw a couple of sentences in present tense, fixed now. Also you dont need to explain what happens step by step in a segment, just get to the point. =)--TrUCo931103:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I was referring to the Jericho/Christian feud, which I fixed earlier, also I have copy edited the event section, try not to use sentences like "hit some armdrags", not encyclopedia like. Also you need to remain in past tense in the event section as well, which I fixed (a majority of it), comment if you have any questions about my edits.TrUCo931104:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
In the aftermath, you need to watch out for using short sentences, try merging them. Also explain details more, how did Edge and Benoit become candidates, where they named or did they win a match? Other than that, I copy edited the first aftermatch feud.TrUCo931104:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yep and then continue it off with "while Michaels had to defeat Christian to become the third candidate", or something like that.--TrUCo931104:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Great absolutely great. Flows well, now I see this as a GA. Let me continue the copy editing of the aftermath, and we should be done.TrUCo931105:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Not that I see, but notify the user who reviewed the article and notify him of the changes and see if he will pass it or if more work needs to be done.TrUCo931121:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, but as the first place team, you should have won. Plus: we broke your 10-game winning streak. As for the admin question: see here. TheChronic00:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I meant yes: you would make a good admin, should you apply of Rfa (or someone nominates you). I would support, in that case. (Sorry about the last message. I was a bit rushed. I'm busy with homework.) TheChronic03:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Idea
What do you think of this idea, LAX and I agree that:
We should invite D.M.N. and bulletproof to return for one final PPV project with the Kliq. If they agree for one more, then all seven past and present members will work on this project. With seven people working on it, we could easily make this article (whatever is chose), a future GA, or even FA. Just an idea, especially to let D.M.N. and bulletproof know that we're still thinking of them. iMatthew200814:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm very tired. I got two hours of sleep tonight, and a few of my edits today have been wierd (if that's the word). As for Unforgiven, I'm not sure. It looks pretty good right now. I did pretty much everything I could think of to it. iMatthew200820:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
He asked me to "give him a buzz" when we start. We are going to start the 19th or march, since some of us are off (including D.M.N.). Once we pick a PPV, we can notify him. iMatthew200820:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I have not gotten to Vengeance yet. As I said to Truco, I refuse to work on a PPV alone, until I figure out how to do the aftermath and background sections, which I am still trying to figure out. iMatthew200820:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Re:X
Oh ok, oh ok, hopefully he can finish it on his own, as I encouraged him to do so. Also, the process to change usernames takes a couple of Days, right now its still being processed, so it should be changed either later today or by next week.--TrUCo931121:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I was and still am, its just that I thought it would have gotten change like in 24 hours, but still Coming to a wrestling ring near you, Truco X, also can you help Cimmo, he really needs to learn how to sign talk pages and not make a new section everytime he replys, just look at my talk page, ive tried to help him but no good.--TrUCo931121:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I have written the majority of the event (the basics). I will do some more touch-ups later, as well as writing the rest of the event, and possibly starting the background. I apreciate the support from both you and Truco though. Thanks! iMatthew200821:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok I merged them, the X is coming ;;;~ ~ ~;;;::::---~~09346809--Break the Code, 0603480___``$$%^^))(The Code is The Answer) XX=YY 9211)*)RIP 93111, THE X LOLTrUCo931121:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I today I am on Wiki and doing hw, but I have a test on Monday, and I can't devote myself to writing a PPV and trying to study, you understand?--TrUCo931121:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Nah thanks. I'm going to do it on my own, but I'll ask for help if I need it. Cimmo is starting to piss me off. I wanted to write this on my own, and they keep adding information. It's times like this where I cannot stand WP:OWN. iMatthew200822:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Holy Shit, now he's coying your userpages. He cannot figure out how to sign a post. Please continue with the refs though. It's a great help. iMatthew200822:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
He re-added RR04 to his page. I left him a civil comment on his talk page, and if he does not remove RR 04, then I will remove it myself again. iMatthew200822:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yup. I guess we'll just have to cleanup the event section as it is now since I didn't get the time to rewrite it today. --Cheers, LAX23:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I at least want the Triple Threat match and Orton versus Michaels (if that's not too much to ask). Other than that, I don't mind. --Cheers, LAX23:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Needs clean up, but is decent. (no offense if you read this Matt.) Also I hear Cimmon is bothering you all?--TrUCo931123:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
No offense taken. It's not even close to being finished. I just got the basics down. Later I have to expand it further, re-word things, check for spelling/grammer errors, and everything else. iMatthew200823:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I'm assuming that you would like the Last Man standing match. If so, then I would like the two I mentioned above, Test versus Steiner, and HHH versus Goldberg. --Cheers, LAX23:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes it does. Sorry for misinterpreting you. I'll get working on the matches tomorrow. BTW, did you see this? --Cheers, LAX23:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
can i please copy and paste your triple h picture onto my userpage and ill have to give you credit its a good pictureCimmo (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Cimmo (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh ok, my bad your second one. What was your first? Also do you think I should nominate NWO 04 for FA/NWO 07 for GA?--TrUCo931100:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
ok, and No Problem, you should create one of those userboxes like the one I have for NWO 04 that say that you helped get it to GA.--TrUCo931100:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I know what you mean. Once I'm done with Unforgiven, I am going to be more determined than ever to get SummerSlam (2007) to GA status. --Cheers, LAX00:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
can i have your Triple H photo so i can put it on my userpage so i can ahve both Triple H and Randy Orton on my userpage.Cimmo (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
can i have your Triple H photo so i can put it on my userpage so i can ahve both Triple H and Randy Orton on my userpage.Cimmo (talk) 4:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Sure. I think that if we you and LAX work on SummerSlam 2007, Truco on NWO 2007, and myself on Unforgiven 2005 tonight, by tomorrow afternoon, we could have all three nominated for GA. iMatthew200801:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
It looks good, but my guess is that it might have the same problems as 04. Dont have time to go through it now, as I want to go through NWO 07 and 04. --TrUCo931101:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I needed help with the NWO 04 aftermath, but I finished it now. I need to fix the refs for NWO 07 as some of them have been removed by WWE.TrUCo931101:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I hope he doesn't (no offense). He should at least familiarize himself with Wikipedia guidelines and policies first. --Cheers, LAX01:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Alright. I'll see if there's anything that needs to be done with the background. --Cheers, LAX00:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Summoner's Guild
Any idea what's going on here. Is this what it appears to be on the surface, a user just messing around, or is there something more? I like to know what I'm getting into before I put an icon on the top of my page. Historically, with the exception of the Penguin Cabal, I only put important things up there. Cheers, SexySeaBass06:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I guess it's what she said here. Kind of rude of her to conscript us, but then again I've just been in a bad mood for the past couple days. I suppose we should be flattered that she thinks we're prominent Wikipedians. Cheers Blue, SexySeaBass02:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely, I think that you'd make a great admin. You aren't controversial; I don't think that anyone has anything bad to say about you. That is ideal for an admin, as admins need the community behind them to hold any real power. You're experienced; hell, you're a member of the Kliq, which has revolutionized wrestling articles. I think that you're everything we need in an admin. However, after you get the tools, go slowly into the mediation aspect of the job. I've mediated a few disputes, and been in dozens of them. While you can certainly handle yourself, that isn't an issue, mediation is a job that everyone needs to take slowly. I would say that to anyone. Message me when you're up for RfA. I'm even willing to co-nominate you if you want. However, I absolutely should not be the only nominator, and maybe I shouldn't do it at all. The war I waged against spoilers left a bad taste in the outside community's mouth. I'll leave that up to you. Cheers SexySeaBass03:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to let you in on a little secret that has helped me survive as an editor through tough disputes and humiliating times: if you admit it when you're wrong, then you will make it through anything. As far as the Hornetman situation goes, I handled that whole thing wrong, but I've admitted it, and I haven't noticed a difference in how I'm looked at or treated. In fact, I've come back from worse than that. My name isn't tarnished; my reputation is still in tact. In the weeks following a situation like that, things are changed a little. RobJ1981 and I haven't spoken since then, for example. However, we're admins on a Wikia, and we're professionals. We'll patch things up; we've been in worse disputes before. As time goes on, that whole situation will move to the back of everyone's minds, I'll still be here, and I'll be the same SexySeaBass I've always been. I'll still be the editor to jumps into disputes head first, forgets to have the newsletter delivered, and refuses to sugarcoat anything. I'll still be screwing with sockpuppeteers, failing to retire, and pissing people off who have a temper as fiery as mine. Anyway, if those blocks worry you, simply apologize sincerely, and the people on that board will understand that those were the mistakes of an inexperienced editor who has grown into a GA and FA producing machine. Cheers, SexySeaBass04:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, to say it cost me my friendship with Rob isn't completely accurate. I don't want to go into details, as he deserves to move on from this, but Rob and I only ever got along while we had a common goal, that being, sending a message to TJ Spyke over some stuff I won't bring up. After the message was sent, I wanted TJ to be allowed back, and Rob didn't. It was all downhill from there. Since then we've only had a professional relationship. As we're both admins on a Wikia, we have to communicate. So we do, simple as that. Whenever the Wikia needs us to be a unit again, we will be. We're mature enough to take care of our responsibilities, and while I can't speak for him, I do have respect for him as an editor. It does mean a lot to me that you consider me a friend, though. Whatever you decide in regards to your RfA, you will have my support. There will be a few oppose votes, as there always are for users who don't have empty block logs, but all in all the RfA voters are reasonable people who will recognize that you're a changed user. Cheers, SexySeaBass04:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely, I will always have your back, and it takes a lot for me to say that to a potential admin, as I have ANI on my watchlist :P. It is nice to be called cool. I've never really been considered cool, so it feels kind of, well, cool. I know what it's like to want to be able to do more about vandalism. I used to want to be an admin, but after getting a glimpse of the tools on Wikia I figured out how little it matters being able to block a user, delete an article, or such things. However, it is convenient, and I don't want to talk you out of it. Anyways, hockey has been something I've enjoyed since I was a little tyke. I remember playing street hockey with my friends; we'd beat the crap out of each other ;). Our parents would get so mad when we'd come home bleeding from the asphalt skinning our faces, but it wasn't because of that; they were angry that we were smiling :P. Cheers, SexySeaBass04:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
i'm so sorry
For not being on this weekend very much. I've been busy (I have a new girlfriend). So, Is Veangance 2003 in good shape or does it still need work? Tech43 (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Could you please read over SummerSlam '07 and Unforgiven '05 as we are now done and preparing them for WP:GAN. --Cheers, LAX02:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
IDK. Matt left a note at WT:PW saying that we would like to nominate them sometime this week. --Cheers, LAX02:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
If it's not too much trouble, may I nominate Unforgiven. I've never nominated an article before, and I would like to nominate this one. iMatthew200802:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Are you saying that I should say that Orton threw Cena into the ring steps first? Sorry for sounding so wonky. --Cheers, LAX02:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
If Zenlax doesn't vote by tomorrow, I'm going to close the polls, because no offense whatsoever to him, but we need to either accept or reject them into The Kliq, so we can move on and start working. iMatthew200802:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I get it now. Does this make sense? ----> After the match, Orton came out and attacked Cena, which lead to an RKO through a Steel chair. --Cheers, LAX02:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah for 06. (And 05 looks good). I didn't want him in, but I've decided to give him a fair shot. But if he screws up at all, he's out. iMatthew200802:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Does this? ----> After the match, Orton came out and attacked Cena, which lead to Orton giving Cena an RKO through a Steel chair. --Cheers, LAX02:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
It's fine, I appreciate the feedback. I'll be so happy once SummerSlam (if it ever does) becomes an FA. --Cheers, LAX02:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
No. I'm saying it has potential as is, but I would like to get it to GA status first. --Cheers, LAX02:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I hate to say it, but I would rather just have Truco (if he would like to) re-write it, and clean it up from there. --Cheers, LAX03:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Well if we can keep up with 5-6, then a newcomer should be able to help out with at least two. Anyways, I gotta get off for the night. I'll be back on tomorrow night, cause of school and all of that other junk. iMatthew200803:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
IDK. He might, he might not. If he doesn't, do want to? Sorry for not working on it like I said I would. --Cheers, LAX03:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I withdrew it from nomination because I noticed it was horribly wriiten, however, me and Nikki cleaned it up and I left it up to WP:PW to review it and do any other changes then I will nominate it for GA within this week.--TrUCo-X03:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
If that comment on Truco's page refers to me nominating Unforgiven, I'd be happy to let you do it, as you did write it. iMatthew200823:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Damn Edit Conflict. Well, if no one replies to Matt's comment at WT:PW, I am going to nominate it tonight. So, if there is anything that needs to be done to it, I would like to do that before I nominate it. A long way of saying Yes, if there is anything that needs to be done. --Cheers, LAX00:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
IDK, mayby not. Because I worked on it, and someone else is trying to take credit, thats my POV.--TrUCo-X00:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Truco, and I felt the same way before he posted that. Blue, I'd like you to nominate it. You wrote the whole thing, I just made some fixes. Please nominate it. Thanks! iMatthew200800:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I'll probably nominate it once I get off. You still want to work on Unforgiven '06? --Cheers, LAX00:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention tonight on Raw. User:Steelerfan-94 is attending, and plans to hold up a DX-Green sign that says "Hey Matt and Kevin." (Kevin obviously being Truco). He thinks he is sitting in section 6 or 7. iMatthew200800:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Cool. He didn't mention sitting next to the Sign Guy. SG normally sits in the front row, and steelerfan is not up there. iMatthew200801:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I have pulled SummerSlam, and will renominate next week. I did this per discussion here as we did not wait the one week policy. --Cheers, LAX11:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Reply Backlash
Its ok, and backlash right now is on hold for me, but I plan on going on with it 2morro, because I'm talking to my 2nd big bro, he's at the RAW arena, he's attending tonights RAW show. NimiTize01:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Well no, because I'm in Orlando, FL., Remember? Oh yea, and am going to March 31 RAW show!!! Got tickets, so I'll see Wrestlemania 24 and RAW before I go home :) NimiTize01:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I want to hold it till 2morro, unless you wanna do something else. And what happen, you can't go anymore or somthing? NimiTize01:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh thanks ;) And no this is like my 50th show???? My first was the week before Wrestlemania 22 and Wrestlemania 22, I went to all the Wrestlemanias (22,23,and going to 24)and all the Summerslams(2006,2007)and some RAW shows, and yes am a traveler, but I still have time to be with my friends here on Wiki, like you ;) NimiTize01:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Uh-O my alarm went off on my Sidekick LX reminding of RAW, I guess I better get going, see ya 2morro ;) NimiTize01:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
To avoid another round of voting, please go back to The Kliq's talk page and bold a second PPV you would not like to do. After this we will have three nominations remaining. Thanks! iMatthew200811:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
That's the problem. He can copy your signature if he feels like doing so, because there is no guideline which prevents him from doing it. However, there is a guideline which prevents you from telling him not to do it, or to get mad at him for doing it: WP:OWN. AlexT/CGuest Book02:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Please vote again, the pay-per-views that were bolded have been "rejected." Please do the same thing, and bold the pay-per-view you would not like to do, out of the remaining pay-per-views left. iMatthew200821:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't hate you, and although I respect WP:PE policy, I understand your reasoning. When GCF gave SummerSlam a Pre-GA review, I learned that there were more mistakes than what I had originally thought. --Cheers, LAX01:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
No thank you. I'll be free most of the day tomorrow, so I'll try to fix as much as I can then. Yeah, he told me that he will review the other two articles (those being Unforgiven and No Way Out) before the end of the week. --Cheers, LAX02:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thats one of my top votes right now. After Zenlax voted one more off, we will have 10. Then we will all vote on more off individually. Then, we will vote (as a group) one more off, with two remaining. Then we will have the final vote, where I will ask D.M.N. and bulletproof for their votes. iMatthew200802:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. I just think it'll be easier doing it by myself (no offense). And, not to interject myself in your discussion above, my top pick for our PPV is WrestleMania 13. What PPV would you like to work on? --Cheers, LAX02:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
OMG! I just got a text from a friend of mine. The test was postponed. My teacher is going to a wake. (Thats what he said). I'll stay on for a little while longer. iMatthew200802:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh! Well, an IP vandalized my userpage earlier today, so I did that so I wouldn't have to deal with IP vandalism on my pages anymore. BTW, please start a new thread on my talk page. I would like to archive it. --Cheers, LAX02:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes we are, but I can't start till the weekend, I just don't have enough time during the week. Anyway, I'm going to get off for real now, lol. Gotta get ready for ECW. Cya tomorrow! iMatthew200802:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Miz and Morrison defeated Colin Delaney and Tommy Dreamer to retain the WWE Tag Team Championship, Shelton Benjamin defeated Stevie Richards, Kane defeated a jobber, and Chavo Guerrero defeated CM Punk to retain the ECW Championship. --Cheers, LAX04:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
GRRRR.' Both of my top PPV's have been bolded. Survivor Series 2006, and SummerSlam 2005. But it's ok. I want one that everyone wants to work on. iMatthew200800:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I guess. Anyway, if you have any last minute nominations, add them before tomorrow morning (per the talk page) iMatthew200800:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm almost done with SummerSlam. All I have to do is expand the lead. Do you know what else I should include in the lead? --Cheers, LAX00:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, GCF said that it is probably too short because articles that are around 30KB, should have a lead that is 2-3 paragraphs, and SummerSlam is 47KB. I've asked him if it is good as is, but I haven't gotten a reply. --Cheers, LAX01:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Because I guarentee that it will be bolded. Btw, I was about to start WM 2000, and it was nominated and hasn't been bolded yet. iMatthew200801:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
IMO, yes. Plus, a consensus was already reached. I agree, but I would rather just expand the lead than remove refs (that's just my opinion). --Cheers, LAX01:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
IDK. But, even if it is removed, it is still 44KB, which means I'll still have to expand the lead some. --Cheers, LAX01:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Uh, I really don't think so. If you look at the PPVs he's expanded, you'll see that he goes into greater detail that me. Anyway, he's about to look it over. --Cheers, LAX01:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thats the thing. I don't want it to be voted in. I don't want it to be our final project, but a few people did, so I decided to be nice and let it go. But maybe I shouldn't have, since you and LAX want to do SS04. No offense whatsoever. iMatthew200801:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar. You've all been doing great work with the pay-per-views, and I'm happy to help in any way. I plan to start looking over yours tomorrow morning to give some feedback. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I had a chance to go through the article today. I did some copyediting and left some notes on the talk page for you. I hope you find them helpful. Please get in touch if any of them are unclear. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
The lead should be expanded because of the guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead section#Length. I can try to help expand it some time tomorrow if you would like. Incidentally, I noticed that you removed the mention of Carlito's apple, which wasn't my intention. I was thinking that it could be explained that this was his thing, as in "Carlito left the ring and grabbed an apple from ringside, as his gimmick involved spitting apple in opponents' faces. As he re-entered the ring and prepared to bite the apple, however, Flair got up and grabbed Carlito's fist. Flair then applied the Figure four lock..." A reference for that could be [1] if you want to add it. If you're fine without, feel free to leave it as is. You and Nici have done a great job on my recommendations and the article is looking really good. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I added some information to the lead to bulk it up a bit and help it summarize the key point (including the aftermath). Please look it over when you get a chance and feel free to make changes if you'd like. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I can't see anything else that needs fixing. I suppose it's now time for the waiting game. Hopefully this will get a review faster than SummerSlam (1994), which is currently driving me crazy, as it's the oldest unreview GA nominee. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I would definitely be willing to look over an article before it's nominated for FA. I'm still not totally sure about how GAs differ from FAs, so I would just go through, do copyediting and make suggestions as I would for a Pre-GA review. If you think that would help, please let me know when you're thinking about nominating an article. One thing that I do think is different between Good Articles and Featured Articles is that by the time an article reaches FA level, it should be completely out of universe (usually done by adding terms like angle, storyline, booked, worked, etc.). I've tried to do this with SummerSlam 1994 and WrestleMania X, and I'm planning on going back and doing it for Royal Rumble 1994 and King of the Ring 1994. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't think you should mention it at all, to me that's not significant. Even if reading from a non pro wrestling POV, its not important. (IMO)--TrUCo-X03:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Well in order for it to become an FL, we need to source it, which will be easy since there were a few champs, and we need to format it like other list of title reigns. I will start work tommorow, but if you can start today, that'll be great.--TrUCo-X03:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Looks good, I will add more refs when I get home (im at school). Do you think its cruft to have like 5 refs in each box, or should we like mix it up?TrUCo-X15:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
For your excellent contributions to Wiki and for stopping vandalism from over exceeding, I award you The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. SexySeaShark17:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
A few Announcements
Cross posted to all Kliq members
As you may or may not have noticed on The Kliq's talk page, I have added two temporary sections. In "Last Minute Nominations," you are free to add any pay-per-view nominations that you have recently thought of or forgot about earlier. If you have any, please add them. If you do not, please just write none, in that section, so we know that you've seen it at least. Also, in "Bring 'Em Backs," you can choose one pay-per-view that has been voted out, and bring it back into the running. All you have to do it choose the pay-per-view and add it to the "Bring 'Em Backs" section. If you would not like to bring back any pay-per-view, please again, write none, so we know you've seen it. Cheers! iMatthew200821:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
We are, I started to do that with the lead paragraph. Now I am looking for sources from nitro/ppv/thunder results, which I have found, just need to finish it. Do you know any other sites that may have WCW TV results? Also can you source the lead?--TrUCo-X22:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Not for FA, but for FL (feature list). We've sourced everything, we just need a picture, most likely one of the first champ, but there is none.Do you want to upload one im not to good with uploading stuff on here.TrUCo-X00:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Never mind, there are no good images of him, the title belt should be enough, now I will alert the WP:PW community to nominate it for FL.TrUCo-X00:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Source the reigns. Note: I have 5 lists already as sources, just keep using them but mix them up when you source it. 2) Find results for that title reign like I have done, but not only from one source, use The Other Arena/PWWEW.net and others with results available for what you are looking for.TrUCo-X02:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I would, but when I first looked at it, I realized that it is much harder than I first anticipated. I would need to work on something like this by myself. I'm terribly sorry. : ( --Cheers, LAX03:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah its on my menu bar. Also for the WWE H/C List, when writing the sources make the note like Won the title on RAW is WAR, or Won the title on SmackDown!--TrUCo-X03:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Why do you want me to email him? I already did it for you, just a heads up. What's going on with the Kliq?--TrUCo-X03:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding. Right now, I am going to finish the background for SummerSlam '04. --Cheers, LAX03:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. I think once we're done, we should do some copyediting, and get GCF to do a pre-GA review for us. --Cheers, LAX03:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Really wth is "Batista", also you need to put the other lists as refs, so each reign will have 3 refs, you understand?--TrUCo-X04:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Not me (referring to the above comment). Anyway, I plan on finishing my PPVs tomorrow so we can work on a new one. --Cheers, LAX05:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
We said awhile back that we would work on Armageddon '06, but Matt has brought it into the Kliq's final group project, meaning we can't do it. IDK, maybe SummerSlam (2005). Thoughts? --Cheers, LAX05:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to do SummerSlam '06, but it is already done. I guess once we're done with '05, we can improve '06 to get it to at least GA status. --Cheers, LAX05:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Do you have e-mail? If so, can you please enable it. I need to talk to you about something off Wikipedia (it deals with a certain someone we both know fairly well). --Cheers, LAX15:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, when I click to e-mail you, it says "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." --Cheers, LAX18:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
This image is definitely not covered as public domain in the US, as not a work of an federal servant. The text clearly states: local government website. --84.142.68.99 (talk) 18:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Description as per uploader:
Photo of Georgetown's central circle, from the Georgetown local government website
Text of the license tag:
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright.
Note: This only applies to works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. --84.142.68.99 (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The Kliq
Thought I should start a new thread, anyway:
"Last Minute Nominations" and "Bring 'Em Backs" have closed. Please go back to the Kliq page and vote for the next round. P.S. I heard Batista was removed from the roster page, and was released. iMatthew200818:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Nope, if he asks, Hornswoggle will probably be honest, and tell him they might re-think it in a few months. Thats just the gossip going around. iMatthew200818:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to start working on SummerSlam today, and probably Unforgiven tomorrow. --Cheers, LAX19:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
SummerSlam. BTW, I've finished the background (except for sourcing) for SummerSlam '04. --Cheers, LAX19:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Can you finish sourcing the rest of the article, Im poofed, I ve done more than half of it. If you can, but make sure the order goes someting like this..<ref name="List1"/><ref name="List6"/><ref>{{cite web|url=pwwew.net}}</ref> (Make sure for each reign you add two list sources (there are 7 lists so mix them up) and then find the TV result..can you do that, or is it too much trouble?TrUCo-X19:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again. Anyway, I'm fixing up the background right now, so could you please not edit SummerSlam for a while. --Cheers, LAX20:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, but this is pissing me off, NWO had a chance, but it failed for a ridiculous reason. That policy made is BS, ppl outside the project dont care about pro wrestling articles, just look at the FLC that we nominated yesterday, no responses yet. I think we should make a consensus like ppl should register to be allowed to review an FLC or FLA. Gosh..TrUCo-X21:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I know what you mean. And I agree with Truco, people outside the project don't care about pro wrestling. Just look at WP:GAN, SummerSlam '94 and Don Kent are the two oldest nominations up there. --Cheers, LAX21:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Definitely. I could only image what would have happened to SummerSlam if I had nominated it for FA. --Cheers, LAX21:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I know. So have you heard? Our project is going to be the featured Wikiproject in next week's Signpost. The Chronic and I are both answering two questions, and Nikki will answer three. iMatthew200819:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Matt e-mailed me shortly after I confronted him about the photobucket account. He has since told the users who perhaps know him the best. --Cheers, LAX19:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
We're still on for Unforgiven. And I'm trying to establish myself as a well-known editor, and the interview will definitely help me. iMatthew200819:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for me being inactive for a long time am not slacking off or anything, my bro was in a car injury and I was inactive for a while, sitting at the doctors worry for my brother. I will be active around 3-6 pm Monday-Thursday and Friday I'll be active all day and more. Sorry for this. NimiTize23:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
No problem. BTW, is the FU through the tables any more notable in the lead than in the results section? --Cheers, LAX20:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks..lol Well now we can finally vote in FLS/FAS (2 votes from project)..Well at least one person responded on the WCW nom page.--TrUCo-X23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, but Im poofed, but the way you added refs, is not too good, I need to fix that like on thursday, I have a test these next three days, and thurs is the last day I go to school, and we can start NWO like friday.--TrUCo-X23:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I haven't been able to do much in the past few hours. I have two essays and two lab write-ups due tomorrow. I still have to write one essay, and finish both labs. iMatthew200823:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it should just say that he won by retrieving the belt, since that is how he won. But, that's just my opinion. --Cheers, LAX23:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Not even out of the 7 list we got? Also but if you can source it with TV results, that would be fine...--TrUCo-X23:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
That happened to me as well, hmm, you mind looking over the ones that I did earlier (the ones without notes [i.e Won on RAW]), because I just sourced it with one of the lists..If we can't find it, then we may have to remove it. Did you check WWE's list?--TrUCo-X23:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah that was a once (well a twice) off thing. Sometimes I just lose the rag and do things and I don't even know I'm doing. It's weird, but you get used to yourself, and it's easy to forget (especially when you're in flip out mode) that other people will have to deal with the crazy things you do. Protectttedspagetti (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
No I just meant the vandalism was a once off. Like how I once spray painted a few things on my neighbour's door, but just once. Really I'd like to help but I'm in no mental state to be left in charge of anything, although I really do appreciate this site and the people who run it. In an ideal world my account would be deleted, it's not really helping anyone. Protectttedspagetti (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
No I really don't think that's a good idea. I'm not the kind of person who can just look in the mirror and know dead eyed certain that they'll do the right thing. If I tried to help I'd probably just end up doing more harm myself. I think the best thing is for me just to stay a reader and an appreciator, but not a contributor, whether negatively or positively. Good luck, it was good talkin to ya. Protectttedspagetti (talk) 00:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Blue, I wanted to inform you that GaryColemanFan will be giving Vengeance an assessment task on what it needs for it to become a future Good article candidate. After he's done with it, can I possibly add it to the Good article nomination page? As I know that you and I worked on it together. ZenlaxTCS19:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Yup, same as usual. ;) Just to clarify, the main feuds were Guerrero/Angle, Orton/HHH, and JBL/Booker? Alright, what did you need help writing? --Cheers, LAX02:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Truco, Nici, and Zenlax vote. We'll go from there. But I gotta go get some sleep, I have a state math assessment test tomorrow. On info I learned in sixth grade, because of the advanced classes, but it is a required state test, so w/e. Night! iMatthew200802:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I wish I knew. I would like to protect my talk page, but that would prevent all IPs from editing it (including the select few that would actually like to talk, instead of vandalize). --Cheers, LAX01:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Same here. I agree, and despite his "good intentions," I believe he has had more than his fare share of chances and should stay banned. --Cheers, LAX01:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Replied. It's no problem. I've already made over 500 reverts today (2 hours). Sorry for sounding like such a dick. --Cheers, LAX02:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! taping spoilers indicate that Killings has already debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. However, no reliable source for this information has been found yet.
The article collaboration for March 3 through March 16 is Ric Flair. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, March 16.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references).
Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
