User talk:Theelf29

This user may have left Wikipedia. Theelf29 has not edited Wikipedia since 27 December 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Hello, Theelf29, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 21:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blackburn Areas

Thanks for expanding this section. I started it because I noticed it wasn't covered elsewhere and thought it might be worth a mention. Skinnyweed 16:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recognition - nice to see the article burgeoning. Theelf29 00:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rivers and Metal

Nice work on local rivers and also unrelated Iron Maiden gubbins! Belting... --PopUpPirate 00:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the regognition. I'd noticed that there was very little stuff on about a lot of rivers in Lancashire & Cumbria, so I felt that, having dealt with those around Blackburn, I should make that my next big thing.

As to Iron Maiden, this Benjamin Breeg malarkey piqued my interest and I noticed there were one or two minor tweaks I could carry out. Thanks again :-) Theelf29 01:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sparta

I had just added succession boxes to the Spartan Kings articles, and then I thought I missed one. But when I looked, I saw that that king's article had just been added. It's always nice to see someone else working on the same topics you are, especially in an undercovered area such as Spartan history. Thanks. Crispus 21:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's my pleasure. I agree it's a shame how little is here to represent the Spartans and, having delved into Pausanias and Plutarch, I'm glad there's someone else out there committed to doing justice to this fascinating culture. Theelf29 22:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs DB320 James McEveley Doug Sampson Sozh Battle River-Wainwright Zurab Khizanishvili Sergio Peter Canadian Hydro Developers Floating tone Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi Ryan Nelsen Nam Ngum Dam Pripyat River University of Wisconsin-River Falls Frenchburg, West Virginia Paul Gallagher Anshan (Persia) Shabaka Andy Taylor (footballer)

Cleanup Olszyc Blackburn Hawks Book of Enoch Merge Wife-sister narratives in Genesis Running Free Instruction set Add Sources Hephthalite Downstep (phonetics) Persepolis Wikify Macedonian Question Dahshur Mungindi, New South Wales Expand A1 (band) Jewish history Quechan

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo

Thank you for your thoughtful edits to the article. So refreshing a change from the usual! --Wetman 13:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's my pleasure. I still think there's much to be done on the article - especially regarding sources and cleanup. I daresay I'll be having another go later :-) Thanks for the appreciation! Theelf29 17:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stydd Brook

Just came across the above article via the "what links here" of Longridge Fell (which I created recently) and just wanted to say well done, it's an interesting read. - Dudesleeper · Talk 13:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just been looking at the Longridge Fell article - nice work! Theelf29 16:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

What's your favourite anime? =D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.252.236.1 (talk) 10:51, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

As I haven't seen them all, it would be unfair to comment :-) Theelf29 17:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=D Anyway, it's nice to see a nice guy here =D 222.252.224.167 11:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :-) It's nice to be appreciated. Theelf29 15:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary box

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

↔ Dennywuh (talk) 03:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 20:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to the Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars project. I hope you enjoy working on it, any questions please dont hesitate to constact me on my Talk Page :)

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 13:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me

What the hell do you think your doing editing MY project's scope. Please do not! Or you can find another project. Vandals have no place in this project.

Police,Mad,Jack

It wasn't vandalism - just a minor correction. Theelf29 (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok duly noted. Sorry now I have re-read what I typed it does like horrible. Sorry.

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 19:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Life on Mars - January 2008 Newsletter

The Life On Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 1 - January 2008

"I had an accident and I woke up in 1973. Am I mad, In a coma, or back in time? Whatever's happened, its like I've landed on a different planet." - Sam Tyler Project news The project was started this month! Well done to Police,Mad,Jack and J. Naven for getting the project off the ground. To do Character profiles, such as Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler, Annie Cartwright and Phyllis Dobbs need expanding. Lesser known characters but still of importance, like Nelson, DC Chris Skelton and DS Ray Carling still need expanding.

New members Police,Mad,Jack, J. Naven, Bevo74, Tphi, GusF, WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden, Rotring, Badwolftv, Theelf29 and Wolfmankurd are the first members.

This newsletter was automatically delivered by _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^play it cool.☆ on 19:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC). To stop recieving this newsletter, tell me through a note on the participants page. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^play it cool.☆ 19:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackburn History

I think it would be ideal to keep the new article, and trim down the history section in the main BRFC article, as it is so much longer than all of the other teams history. infact its about 3/4 times as long, and they all have articles named 'main article: history of.....'.

What do you think?

That would be my ideal solution, as I think that the history section under the main BRFC article is too long and unwieldy when the history of the club has its own article. Thanks for getting back to me. Theelf29 (talk) 17:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

River Keer

Your thoughts would be appreciated over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:River_Keer#Photographs --Martinship (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Your local insight is very important since I live half a world away. --Martinship (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Hiram Key

I have removed two "citation needed" tags from the "Book summary" section of the article "The Hiram Key": one following the words "as most historians believe" and the other following the words "Jewish esoteric at the time." The section containing the tags is a summary of what the book says. The citation, in each case, is therefore given in the title and lede. My guess is that the editors who inserted the tags were questioning the assertions of the books authors, but did not realize that they were reading a book summary. If I am mistaken, and the tags were inserted from disbelief that the book authors had made these assertions, the tags should be restored. — Jay L09 (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Night Head Genesis

I'm so sorry if this reply took centuries...i'm still lucky to even remember my password here. Thanks for your comment. I really loved this anime and when i saw it here, well...words just escaped me. totally speechless. so i decided to add some info for those who likes this anime as much as i liked it. thanks again!!! ^^

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Theelf29. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Theelf29. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Theelf29. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cynfarch Oer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cynfarch Oer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of River Lyvennet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article River Lyvennet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Lyvennet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Xegma(talk) 17:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]