User talk:The Grand Delusion

→

The Grand Delusion, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The Grand Delusion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Please fix your signature

Your signature is currently producing several lines of wikitext (e.g. Special:Diff/914527744), which makes discussions harder to follow when looking at the wikitext. Please fix it so it comes out as a single line in the wikitext. If you need help, you can post what you have in your preferences and we can help you come up with a solution. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 12:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reggieplata102

This user is still block evading outside his account — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B058:A290:31BE:FFD5:BB8A:2802 (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 in American television

Sorry, I was just trying to accept the pending edits my way. I should've waited until it was accepted by a admin or another user. --Keith Okamoto (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:October 2019

Heeeeeeyyyyy!!! You're wrong this time!! I did not do any vandalism and/or distruptive editing on Cartoon Network Studios! I removed those three links because that two titles, Adventure Time: Elements and Steven Universe: The Movie, have "already" been premiered an aired on TV. So, like a new series that premiered its first episode, they're announcement web links no longer needed. Luigi1090 (talk) 21:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Luigi1090: I still think it's uncalled for to remove sources, exacerbated by how you removed them without giving a valid reason for doing so in the edit summary. Unexplained content removal is frowned upon by the Wikipedia community, especially if it's reliable sources or if the content is properly sourced. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 19:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's required to remove them, because those web links already also in their pages. Luigi1090 (talk) 22:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Luigi1090: Where in Wikipedia policy does it say this?
Also, can any admins confirm if this is true? NinjaRobotPirate? Bbb23? Anyone? The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 20:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what this is about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: This is about Luigi1090's unexplained removal of sources from Cartoon Network Studios, which he tried to justify by saying 1) the sources were for the announcements and were no longer necessary since the TV movies/miniseries already premiered, and 2) the sources were in the linked pages. I would like to know if his actions are justified. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 21:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think content should be properly sourced on every page where it appears. You never know when someone is going to remove citations from the article, or the linked page could be deleted, etc. I guess you could skip adding a citation if it's obvious enough and supported on the linked page, but that's different from actively removing citations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: No need to say "You never know when...", because those two linked pages will never be erasable: Adventure Time: Elements is in "good" article status (Steven Universe: The Movie not again but it will be shortly)Luigi1090 (talk) 18:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hi, I am BaldiBasicsFan. I just want you to know that the American release for 101DS was delayed to another date. See here:

https://www.laughingplace.com/w/disney-plus/

1) source does not explicitly mention a delay. 2) source is likely self-published - self-published sources are largely discouraged. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 15:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Powerpuff Girls 2016 & Gumball Outdated Pages + Message About TV Show Cancelations

It's Never Gonna Get Updates Last Time I Checked The Amazing World Of Gumball Had It's Final Episode Back In June Go See Proof On Google And As You May Know That The Powerpuff Girls 2016 Is Not Even Mention By Cartoon Network Since June 16 2019 Also Known As My 16th Birthday So Start Going Through The Internet To Find The Latest Info And Add Them To Wikipedia Also TV Shows Do Get Canceled Without Notice Because TV Shows Get Canceled Anytime The People Want To. That Lesson Was Taught In The Arthur Episode The Last Of Mary Moo Cow Dorarocks2003 14:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorarocks2003 (talk • contribs)

How many times do I have to tell you? We can't change it until a year has passed! The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 15:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infinity Train and Summer Camp Island

This is getting really tiresome. Stop reverting the pages back to outdated info. They are confirmed for HBO Max, they were at the presentation for Max Originals with the HBO Max logo on them. This isn't some speculation, it was by WarnerMedia themselves. See for yourself. Furthermore, the creator of Infinity Train himself said it's coming to Max after retweeting it. Again, see for yourself.

All you're doing is reverting the page back to an outdated version of it that does nothing but slow progress and inconvenience everyone. If you want this to stop, then stop.

Nights At Nyte (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I am only reverting because a number of editors (me, Drmies, Blue Pumpkin Pie, and Coasterdude1) have all objected to the inclusion of the information. Also, Twitter is not considered a reliable source unless the account is verified - please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Twitter. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 23:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nights At Nyte:The image is so small, its hard to see, using images for confirmations, in my opinion is poor method of verifying. All you need to do is find a credible source that can confirm it.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 23:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nights At Nyte, try not to insult people, please. Speculation or not, it needs to be verified properly. It's really as simple as that. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• How on EARTH is the official conference and the creator confirming it NOT OFFICIAL ENOUGH?! Nights At Nyte (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Nights At Nyte: A random blurry photo from a random twitter user is not credible. If what you said is true, there will be credible sources covering it and we can use those sources instead. You could always ask HBO Max on their official twitter if Infinity train (season 2) is coming to HBO max and that would be a better approach.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 05:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hey, Its Edwordo13. So, the message you sent me, sorry about that. I wasn’t having a good day today. It won’t happen again. —Preceding undated comment added 02:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids

Hi The Grand Delusion, thank you very much for your contributions and the report at WP:AIV. Please keep the advice from the above section in mind when reverting changes, and seek discussion even if you are right. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

190.237.88.9

You warned 190.237.88.9 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for making unsourced changes in "year in American television" articles. He's made a number of changes, again, and you might want to report him at WP:AIV if the new changes are unsourced. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicktoons

Since when does Wikipedia not count "one-off" last air dates for a program? They aren't even one-off airings! On Christmas Day 2016, Invader Zim, Danny Phantom, and Fanboy & Chum Chum returned briefly to air Christmas episode reruns. Also, Pig Goat Banana Cricket aired only once in 2018 to burn off the remaining 3 episodes. The last time a show airs on TV is considered the last air date. I know this because I've been following the schedule for a while now so I know when something is airing or not. I wouldn't have put those shows in the current programming if there weren't any upcoming airings of the show showing on Zap2It, which IS an official TV schedule website.

(Anthonyg3281 (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Those are airings that are not part of a show's regular run, and are not episodes that aired first-run on the network. Therefore, we shouldn't count them. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 20:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This should help you understand what "last air date" means. Those last air dates for those four shows are now outdated, so that's why you see me put them in the current programming since there is upcoming airings of them, and when the day of the final airings come, I put them back in the former programming. http://www.nickandmore.com/history/nick-series.html (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Nickandmore is not a reliable source. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 01:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I posted on the talk page like you told me to do. (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I keep trying to tell you that I've been keeping track of the Nicktoons schedule for a while and it's hard to find a source besides the Anime Superhero Nicktoons Channel Discussion Forum (in which that community has been keeping track of the Nicktoons schedule since 2014) and NickAndMore (who has been keeping track of Nickelodeon stuff since the 90s and still does today) for the last air date because there is no possible way to see a previous schedule on Zap2It (only yesterday's schedule) or other TV listing websites and it's not easy to find all of the previous schedules with a reliable source because of that. (Send a message) (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@Anthonyg3281: Neither of those are reliable sources. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 19:27, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Boondocks

Removing the reboot of The Boondocks from the HBO Max template for not being a continuation is NOT vandalism. It's a REBOOT, and thus a completely original series. It's not on there yet because there isn't a Wikipedia page for it, which there will be one later. All you're doing is making it inconvenient for everyone. Again, The Boondocks on HBO Max is NOT a continuation and thus doesn't belong in that section. I only removed it the first time because I thought some random person made a mistake, not knowing someone was going to make an issue with it. Nights At Nyte (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nights at Nyte: 1) I never said it was vandalism, only that it was disruptive. 2) Your edits are removing The Boondocks from the template completely. A more constructive option would be to move it to "Upcoming original series" instead of just removing it outright. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 21:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicktoons

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

ANI notice

There's a discussion about you at ANI. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About your Disruptive Editing Warnings

Hello, I've noticed that you have recently been warning multiple users for disruptive editing on their talk pages. I do not want to sound rude, but just simply wanted to say that although these sources are indeed not reliable, these edits do not seem to be disruptive, but made in good faith. Again, not trying to sound rude, but I just want to remind you to assume good faith next time. Thanks for reading. RandomUsernameNumber83 (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomUsernameNumber83: The editor had re-inserted the unreliably-sourced content multiple times. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 00:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I hadn't noticed until now that the same edits were made by different IPs. Sorry, and thanks for letting me know. Keep up the good work. RandomUsernameNumber83 (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:March 2020

Heeeeeeeeeeeyyyyy!!! You've wrong ONLY for a thing!!! For "Pilots and Films/TV Specials "NOT" produced by Cartoon Network Studios", that ISN'T an inappropriate discussion, because I'd created this paragraph just to prevent the appearance of all those titles on the main article. By deleting it you've left the way that future anonymous Wikipedia users will vandalize it by inserting them. Luigi1090 (talk) 00:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Luigi1090: The talk page is NOT a place for lists of things. If you want to put up a list of pilots not produced by Cartoon Network Studios, go to Anime Superhero's forums or whatever, where they'd be more accepting of that kind of stuff. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 00:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Boondocks, Again

Dude, the page for The Boondocks' is now a redirect to the episodes page. There is no reason to have it on the template, so I'm doing the logical step and removing it until it gets added again. Stop!

Nights At Nyte (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Possible issues with User:Luigi1090

Answer me only from your paragraph that you created at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, not in my talk page: I 've already given my opinion. Luigi1090 (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network Shorts Department

Yes, it is necessary. The main three words in the Status section, Failed, Uncertain and Successful, are imposed on a city/town traffic semaphore inspired style. Black is a turned off color. Luigi1090 (talk) 02:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I need on the 101 Dalmatian Street to remove summaries to make room for episode plots as I now think the summaries are copyright. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicktoons

Hey, it's been a while since we last talked. A lot of changes have happened to the Nicktoons schedule since the thread was locked in February. Currently, Back at the Barnyard has a 10am-3pm marathon on Tuesdays while The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron, Boy Genius has one on Fridays. Sanjay and Craig and Breadwinners also had these types of marathons this year, but are not currently now. The Legend of Korra left the schedule in March while Rugrats aired for the first time on the Nicktoons channel since 2011 on April 11, 2020 (in which I still have the DVR recordings and saved the schedule on a Notepad document). Also, there is a new archive schedule website for Nickelodeon that was launched in March that I contribute to, in which right now we are only focusing on the main Nick channel, but I hope we will get to do the sister channels in the future. Check it out here: https://nickstory.fandom.com/wiki/Nickstory_Wiki. I think it's safe to say that those Christmas airings were not the last air dates for Back at the Barnyard and Breadwinners as both became part of the regular schedule this year, so I think it is time that we unlock the page so that it can be updated since it hasn't been for 3 months now. (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 01:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

My source

I'm giving you my source here: https://www.nick.com/tv-schedule — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snesboy12 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock notices

Hey there, a quick friendly note re: this. That master has been blocked for years, (and is not likely to get the note) and there is no requirement that we notify suspected socks or their masters. In most cases I actually think it's better if they don't get notified. It's at least more fun to surprise them with a block if they are a sock. That's probably the only joy anyone derives from chasing socks. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About The Baby Huey Show

Nowhere in the end credits of the second season of the show there's a mention of Film Roman. Instead, Universal/Harvey Animation Studios is credited as the production company. I have also done this change to other articles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=mImr1YS_hXk (in case I break the copyright law by showing this link tell me. It's just the season two credits, not an episode) NickBlamp (talk) 04:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to revert all other corresponding edits I did, that's fine. I just wanted to show you that I didn't have bad intentions. NickBlamp (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's also this comment of Stephen DeStefano on this Cartoon Brew article by Jerry Beck about Huey, where he states that the second season was produced at Universal. https://www.cartoonbrew.com/classic/baby-huey-6462.html Also, I still can't find actual references (other than mentions on free to edit websites) that Film Toman produced season two. NickBlamp (talk) 16:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Watch before you revert!

I see you were trying to help removing the mess 174.130.206.25 made in the Elinor Wonders Why page. Unfortunately you reverted the page to the second last edit made by this guy. I have requested the bad edits removed. Be careful next time!Ryotanada142 (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disney+ Exclusive International Distribution Dispute

The lack of discussion or justification from your behalf on the inclusion of the exclusive international distribution section on the list of Disney+ original programming through your edits or the talk page does not justify why this section should be included. Instead of reverting the edit with "No one has responded to the talk page discussion in question.", wouldn't it be easier to respond to the talk point to clear up this question? The lack of response does not equate to clarity on this point and just makes it more frustrating and confusing. LFLEncycolpedia (talk) 01:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One Night in Miami

At the time I pinged you we needed consensus. It wasn't to waste your time. I won't ping you again when consensus is needed. Take care. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Thanks for telling me that. I won't be blocked from editing without further warning so I have to keep in mind to not do that. MLJ 657 (talk) 23:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I did add a reference. Did you not see my edit at all? One of the showrunners confirmed that the reboot series is over and it is unknown if the franchise will continue.77.77.164.94 (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@77.77.164.94: Twitter is not a reliable source, per WP:RSP. Also, the tweet you cited does not explicitly mention that the show is ending. Not only did you cite an unreliable source, you also violated WP:OR. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 03:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 cancellation sources

I apologize for not adding sources. I saw the news on Twitter from sites like TV Line and forgot to copy the links to the articles.

I currently plan to restore my edits while adding the sources to the information. Thanks for reminding me. AustintheGamer (talk) 21:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Mouse Mixed-Up Adventures

Hi The_Grand_Delusion

I understand that you think that Mickey Mouse Mixed-Up Adventures was not over, But I saw that it says that the episode "The Pink City" was the series finale. If you still think that I was wrong, please let me know. JustinThomasArieVanOorschot (talk) 06:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS. It was on the List of Mickey mouse Mixed-Up Adventures Episodes JustinThomasArieVanOorschot (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed-Up Adventures series ended

I understand how you enjoyed the series and feel it hasn’t been finished, but you must realize that the series must’ve finally ended. After all there’s no news of any new episodes for the show. And the Funhouse series is it’s successor.

boomerang

i edited for reliable source and go watch cartoon network commercials from 10-2-1992 on youtube

@Vitopavlovivit: Um... I did not see any inline citations used, as outlined by WP:ILC. Also, I can't help but notice the broken English you seem to be using. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 20:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

prove that boomerang started on 12-8-1992

@Vitopavlovivit: Prove that it started on 10-2-1992. If you can provide a reliable source that says so, then I'll let the edit stay. YouTube is not a reliable source, and also, you have to provide an inline citation in the form of a footnote. Wikipedia:ProveIt is a helpful tool that I use to create inline citations within an article. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 21:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network

I'm sorry about that last minute edit. My goal is to reorganize the Categories. Especially since the network is slowly changing with it's increase of programming blocks.

Hello, it was wrong of you to remove Ladybird Lu because the series is still coming to Cartoon Network but it's now under a new title Lu & the Bally Bunch.[1] 162.40.51.236 (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi The Grand Delusion! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Disagreement over removal of sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About page moves

I am so sorry about my page moves. I did this as I thought it was spelling mistake. I am reverting my moves. Thanks. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I'm so sorry. --MLJ 657 (talk) 13:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MLJ 657: Sorry about what? The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 19:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For what I did over the year. Can you forgive me?--MLJ 657 (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HarveyTeenager ranges

Looking at all of HarveyTeenager's edits and IP addresses, I think multiple rangeblocks are very much needed here due to the huge scale of the edits (and because their main IP ranges are dynamic)

They IP hop a lot, but these are all of the rangeblocks I calculated for them:

• 67.214.0.0/19
• 75.88.64.0/18
• 75.89.204.0/22
• 98.21.56.0/21
• 148.170.98.96/27
• 173.184.104.0/21

I've also made a draft LTA page here in my second sandbox: User:Wizzito/sandbox2

What do you think? wizzito | say hello! 07:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

As I stated on the talk page, do not contact me again about year old disputes. I have no interest in your WP:DEADHORSE, WP:HOUNDING, and WP:HARASSMENT violations. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ended original programming section on Disney+

I feel like there should be a section dedicated to the ended shows on Disney+. There are so many shows on Disney+ that have been axed in the streaming service's two year lifespan, so it makes sense to have a section dedicated to the ended shows, if not, then a separate article like with Netflix. ZX2006XZ (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re my self-reversion on WP:UAA

The editor does not qualify as I left a message on the talk page then reported at UAA and I realized that's against protocol. snood1205 21:17, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HBO Max Programming Sources

When the new series, new season of a series, new movie or new special has premiered, you don't have to keep the sources except when the series has ended. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think that's a pointless and bad precedent. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 05:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of television shows notable for negative reception

Regarding your recent edit on List of television shows notable for negative reception. You are correct that there is no rule about reverting admins, and I certainly don't mind. My objective is to preserve stability. I am not getting involved in this dispute. I made one revert when I saw validly sourced content be removed without a valid explanation, but since then the article has gone back and forth. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The article is now full-protected due to the content dispute, now that I noticed this dispute has been ongoing since before I came along. Please weigh in on the talk page as to why you believe the "Velma" content should not be there. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:BrickMaster02

Hi, please do not continue to re-add your warning on this user's talk page. Users are allowed to blank sections off of their talk page if they wish, and continuing to re-add it over their reversions is, at minimum edit-warring. If y'all have disagreements about the content of the page, you should take it to the talk page. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few clarifications.

Hi, The Grand Delusion. I see now that you've been correcting my grammar mistakes for some time now at the Wikipedia:Unusual articles page. I now come to talk to you about precisaly that. I now recognize my past mistakes, and am going to go on to edit my native language's Wikipedia pages, and that's pretty much it. I wish you the very best. O recomeço (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@O recomeço: Aaaand you just proved you can't be trusted to stick to your word, and continue to edit English Wikipedia despite your obvious competency issues with English grammar and spelling - [1]. The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 17:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Programs Broadcast by Boomerang

I saw that you edited the List of Programs Broadcast by Boomerang page, which I did when I noticed that Looney Tunes had been gone from Discovery Family, so I decided to fix that because it was not airing on Discovery Family. But then you edited it to make it say that it still airs on Discovery Family. It no longer does! It’s true! Cheesetouch11 (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read the edit summary I provided? I was asking for proof of your claim. Per WP:BURDEN: "People must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations." The Grand Delusion^(Send a message) 22:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone to the page which shows the programs broadcast by Discovery Family, and it says that it no longer airs. Also, yesterday a forum started on this website called Anime Superhero about Discovery Family still airing commercials for the show even though it got removed. That is more proof. They are right. It no longer airs there. Cheesetouch11 (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. https://worldscreenings.com/company/9-story-distribution-international/