User talk:ThadeusOfNazereth/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ThadeusOfNazereth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Thadeus Smith, Winter Raptor II, December 2017.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thadeus Smith, Winter Raptor II, December 2017.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doug Ford Jr.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Ford Jr.. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Social policy of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Social policy of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jan Grabowski (historian)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jan Grabowski (historian). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Holocaust denial

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Family of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Family of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Navarro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Navarro. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John R. Bolton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John R. Bolton. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Ingraham Angle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Ingraham Angle. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dana Loesch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dana Loesch. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries by firearm-related death rate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries by firearm-related death rate. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Cabinet of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cabinet of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Douma chemical attack

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Douma chemical attack. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nicholas Hoult

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nicholas Hoult. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flag of Syria

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag of Syria. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Communist Party of China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Communist Party of China. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michel Aoun

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michel Aoun. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 07:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bipartisan Report

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bipartisan Report. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Lists of airline destinations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Lists of airline destinations. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Al-Awamiyah

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Al-Awamiyah. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Mustafa Tamimi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Mustafa Tamimi. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lion Guard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lion Guard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Liberalism in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Liberalism in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:California Proposition 187

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:California Proposition 187. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mt. Fuji Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Waterboarding

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Waterboarding. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:InfoWars

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:InfoWars. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edinburgh Central (Scottish Parliament constituency)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edinburgh Central (Scottish Parliament constituency). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Microaggression

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microaggression. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of military occupations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sean Hannity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Hannity. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joan Freeman (Irish psychologist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joan Freeman (Irish psychologist). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Douglas A-4 Skyhawk

Too much hassle to argue against types like you. If you want errors in the article, you can have them. Have fun lying to people, I'm out. 91.10.43.65 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

• There's not really anything to argue about. If information is inaccurate, you can change it, provided you cite sources. In the case of Douglas A-4 Skyhawk, you removed vast swathes of the article without any reference to reliable sources. WP:V is clear that major changes like that need to be verifiable. ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

You saw my draft about List of Kenyan entrepreneurs and sent a thank you note, despite the article still being in a draft stage. These small things motivate new editors like me and I'd like to appreciate you with this virtual cookie. Bless you. ObongiFrank (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Acupuncture

Would you like to explain why you used roll back on my edits to the acupuncture page. In one case you added back obvious source misrepresentation. You are aware that roll back is for vandalism only?AlmostFrancis (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@AlmostFrancis: - While this specific edit was in fact a misclick, after reading your comments and the original source, you're incorrect when you say it's "obvious source misrepresentation. The linked article states "Acupuncture may be considered as an adjuvant to conventional therapy (e.g  ., drugs, physical therapy, and exercise) in the treatment of nonspecific, noninflammatory low back pain."[1]. ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

"The majority of people who seek out acupuncture do so for musculoskeletal problems, including low back pain, shoulder stiffness, and knee pain.".[2] The source is about Japan and the content misrepresents that by removing that context. You are aware that when you use rollback you are responsible for every edit you roll back and not just the one you don't like? You said it was a misclick and I am fine leaving it there but please be more careful in the future.AlmostFrancis (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@AlmostFrancis: Again, this edit was a misclick. I know what rollback is for, reading the rules is one of the requirements to be awarded rollback rights and it says it right above this section on my talk page. Thanks for pointing out that citation, I didn't realize that was bundled with the accidental rollback I made. ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 18:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Historical rankings of presidents of the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Historical rankings of presidents of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raiffeisen Zentralbank

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raiffeisen Zentralbank. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rent regulation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rent regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PCCW

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:PCCW. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ministry of Transport

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ministry of Transport. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The World Factbook list of developed countries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The World Factbook list of developed countries. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donors Trust

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donors Trust. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Immigration and crime in Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rocket Lab

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rocket Lab. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

I really appreciate the barnstar, especially since this is the first time I've ever been awarded one! I don't really feel like I did too much besides aggregating sources, but I'm hoping someone can make good use of them. Hope you have a great day. :) TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Do not give warnings if you have not read what you are giving warnings about

You just gave me a warning without even reading what you were reverting. That is incredibly unprofessional.

I specifically asked to take it to the talk page. If you are going to be unprofessional and refuse to use the talk page, then please refrain from making reverts or edits at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B02C:A55E:C01F:9C97:54B9:5E0D (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

In the future, make sure there's a consensus according to WP:CON before engaging in an edit war. A single comment in the talk page made by you doesn't constitute a consensus, and leaving passive-aggressive messages on registered editor's talk pages doesn't help your cause. You've been repeatedly asked to properly source the information you're adding to the page, and until you do so, your edits will continue to be reverted. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 16:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

I really appreciate the barnstar, especially since this is the first time I've ever been awarded one! I don't really feel like I did too much besides aggregating sources, but I'm hoping someone can make good use of them. Hope you have a great day. :) TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey Thefreshmaker22 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Lauren Hutton

You take spelling advice from someone who cannot spell sentence? 192.58.125.12 (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

As I've already stated on your talk page, I reverted your edit because it goes against WP:MOS. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 21:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Vero Beach High School

Thank you. We edit-conflicted on reporting this. You got there first. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

No problem! It seems like the pages that get vandalized the most are always high school pages ;) ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Spieden Island

Hello,

I made a change to the above link which you removed.

The change I made was removing something that was unsourced and easily verified false. I did not add a source because I am unsure how to with the Washington State Business License search. If you have advice I would appreciate it as I am new to this.

The island is still owned by James Jannard. Here is a link to the parcel: https://parcel.sanjuanco.com/PropertyAccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2019&prop_id=17456

Which states that it is owned by "Under The Radar, Inc."

When you plug it into: https://secure.dor.wa.gov/gteunauth/_/#1 You see that Under the Radar is owned by Jim (James) Jannard. But It won't let me link the license.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.185.168.138 (talk) 21:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

@208.185.168.138: I really appreciate you taking the time to do that! I’m on my phone at the moment but when I get an opportunity I’ll figure out how to cite that information and either update the article or leave a message on your talk page with info on how to do it. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 23:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth! You created a thread called Help with User Page Formatting at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Zzuuzz/unprotected talk page

Boring trolls at it after managing to find the "unprotected" version. Nothing better to do except to vandalise. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 21:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

@Iggy the Swan: You're right about that - It looks like a bunch of different IPs, do you think they're using a VPN? I'm not sure how AIV requests work when vandalism's that prominent. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 21:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

VPN (you mean Virtual private network) - I do not have great knowledge in that but it I'd say yes, it looks like that's what's going on by the diagram used. It looks like things have quietened down now. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 21:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry!

Hello! I just wanted to apologize for the Stacy Jupiter edit I made. A friend of mine is doing a project to contribute to said page for a class. I was trying to be funny and mess with them. I am not trying to justify my actions just letting you know that someone will be indeed positively contributing! Ocotpi73 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

@Octopi73: There's no hard feelings from me! Before I started editing Wikipedia seriously, I vandalized a lot of pages so I know how funny it can seem - I appreciate your apology though, and I'm glad to hear that someone's going to be expanding that article! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 16:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nordic model

I would disagree with your definition of neutral. My edit where I pointed out the sexist nature of the Nordic model, in part by showing how it reversed the usual model for dealing with illegal trade, was simply telling the truth. Neutral would mean that neither the feminist perspective nor the men's rights perspective is favored. It is quite clear you favor the former over the latter (as do most if not all wikipedia editors) and therefore are NOT neutral.

@179.6.202.205: The neutral side is generally the side supported by academics. If the “feminist” side is supported by academics, and the “men’s rights” side isn’t, then it would appear you’re in fact biased towards the “men’s-rights” side. In addition, Reddit isn’t an acceptable source for information on “men’s rights.” ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 14:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Libertarianism

Please comment on the discussion regarding the use of the term "right libertarian" to describe libertarians that do not oppose free markets, and that do not make a clear distinction between laissez-faire capitalism and advocacy of free markets. This discussion can be found on the talk page for the Libertarianism article. The term is primarily used in a derogatory way and by self-described "left-libertarians". The individuals described in that article, and in the poorly-titled right-libertarianism article do not typically identify with the political right - or the political for that matter. JLMadrigal @ 13:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Rejina Sabur-Cross

I am a personal friend of Rejina Sabur-Cross and a vindictive relative in Bangladesh (who is currently embroiled in the scandalous theft of her mother's land out there) saw fit to publish personal details about her address and also her very young children. She would appreciate complete removal of the page tbh as she hasn't written about food for a really long time. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juie45 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

@Julie45: I looked over the page and didn’t see any identifying info, although I’m on my phone and may have missed something. Unfortunately, the page can’t be taken down immediately - you’ll have to follow the process at this page: WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Do not send me a warning

Hi there. Please do not send me a warning first. I forgot to explain it previously. Now could you send me a welcome message instead. Please do not scare on a warning message to me. So please send me a welcome message instead. I promise I will do better next time. OK? Thanks. 50.92.230.195 (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@50.92.230.195: For clarification, I sent a general note before the warning - I want to encourage you to post on Arielle Vandenberg's talk page with your reasoning for why the relationship history should be removed! Fostering discussion is the best way to learn how Wikipedia works. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm not vadalizing

I made omissions to the Garcia (actor) page because most of the information posted is inaccurate and wish for it to be removed. I'm not trying to vandalize it. I'm trying to keep it as simple as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizopp (talk • contribs) 04:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Wizopp: The information you're removing is properly sourced. If you have reason to believe that it is inaccurate, you need to open a discussion on Garcia (actor)'s talk page with counter-sources so that we can reach a consensus. I would check WP:CON for more info on that process! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Please

I understand that this information may be viewed as "properly sourced" but I personally rather it not be there (it's my page, the page is about me) and a lot of it is iffy and if anything at all.. please don't reject my minor edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizopp (talk • contribs) 05:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Wizopp: If that's the case, check this page and email the address there, they should be able to help and normally have the ability to permanently remove some personal information or delete articles altogether. I can't guarantee that works, but that's the best outlet you have to avoid getting blocked by other editors. In the meantime, I'll try and clean up that page and see if there's anything I can do to minimize your personal information. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 18:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I will try that address. And I thank you in the meantime. I only wish to represent myself in an honest manner and I feel that those who have created/contributed to my page have reduced me down to my gender identity, which is hurtful and I'm so much more than just being "transgender." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizopp (talk • contribs) 00:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Honorifics

Hello - your recent edit of [1] has been reverted as it breaches MoS. Please review [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8 (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8: In the future, make sure that edits you make don't break the grammatical flow of the sentence. I see you fixed it after a little bit of back and forth, but make sure that in trying to fix one error you don't introduce another. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 21:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I kindly suggest that you reply to people in a polite fashion rather than giving orders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8 (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm not going to get into an argument on my talk page, but telling you to follow all parts of the MOS, not just specific pieces you've cherry-picked, isn't really an "order" since you agree to do that when you make an edit. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 23:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Your initial reply included ’make sure that edits you’ and ‘make sure that in trying‘ ... those are orders. A polite and constructive reply would not have been so imperative.

Your recent reply included ‘telling you to follow’ ... that is another order. Again, those wishing to be polite would not ‘tell’ others.

’I'm not going to get into an argument’ ... that is very telling. Both my previous comments were polite, including polite requests, so that response of yours suggests a confrontational thought process: review of civility should be informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8 (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8: I've been nothing if not civil. If you have any other issues with my, you can let an administrator know at WP:ANI. Otherwise, the edit dispute was resolved yesterday and there's no need for you to lecture me about Wikipedia's rules. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 03:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your language has been anything other than civil: you have consistently used an imperative tone by repeatedly giving orders, and never once used any form of politeness. Your recent response continues with such, for example misrepresentating polite requests as ‘lecturing’ ... this is highly suggestive of projecting your attitude onto me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8 (talk) 11:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8: Again, I see no issue with my conduct. The edit dispute has been taken care of for two days now. If you have any other issues, you can file a report at WP:ANI. Thanks. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 14:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Jaggi Vasudev

Hello! This is about an edit which was made and a summary was provided. The action was reverted by you and was termed as 'mistake'. This is to inform you that it wasn't the case. Edits are being made to make Wikipedia article better which take both time and energy of editors, any action regarding the edits must be made after confirming on the talk page of the users. Also, the page had been tagged to remove 'poorly sourced' and 'potentially libelous' contents. It says that article needs immediate removal of such information. Please contribute to the same. Thanks Abhayoct13th (talk) 21:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Abhayoct13th, I took a quick look through the previous revisions of the page and could not find any that were tagged as such - if you could point me to which revision had that tag, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, I'll continue to revert your edits that are removing properly sourced information and I'll encourage you now to wait for a consensus on the talk page before removing that information. If you can leave a source on the talk page saying his foundation did not break rules, that would be extremely helpful as well. Thanks!

I understand what you said. But what about my properly sourced information that I provided related to the subject's title and him being renowned internationally. I provided reliable sources but you reverted them too. And you said to leave a source that he didn't break rules, please keep in mind that the allegations mentioned in the article, have also not been proved and the citing has only been done of accusations which makes the article baised. I hope you'll be professional and be conducive in rendering unbiased information. But it is appearing that you're personally not wanting to the article to be amended. Abhayoct13th (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

About reverted edits.

Hello. This is about the reverted edits on the page Jaggi Vasudev. You reverted three of my edits made to the page. If two of my edits appeared as vandalism in any manner, I will definitely try to be more precise while editing and writing the edit summary. But the first edit related to Title and added citations, being reversed was a disappointment. It provided proper citations but still you reverted it. The article itself is demanding better sources and removal of poorly sourced citations showing tabloid journalism. If you will revert everything in the name of vandalism, then it would discourage other editors. You seem to be in some authority, please be open to every suggestion. It appears as if you personally don't want any changes to be made to the article. Abhayoct13th (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

@Abhayoct13th: Hey! So when I make reversions, sometimes I can only see the most recent edit you've made and have to make a decision based on that. In this case, the interface only showed me that you removed the properly sourced content, so I reverted based on that. If you have additions to make that have citations, go ahead and make those - I apologize that those got caught up. As far as the "libelous sources" and the tags - Unless you can specifically show that those articles are fake or reach a consensus with other editors on the talk page, they should stay - We want to maintain a neutral point of view WP:NPOV. I don't see the tags saying that it's poorly sourced or has libelous information on either the article or the talk page - If you could point me to where those tags are I'd appreciate it :).

Other than that I think the rest of this discussion should happen on the talk page - I see you already made a post there. If you could add some sources against the specific sections there it would be really helpful! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 23:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Wind Turbine

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth. I've just added sources in the article. Back me, please - this whole article looks like a joke. Or well paid document written somewhere where it doesn't surely suppose do be. Let's not be biased! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Programmer Physicist (talk • contribs) 22:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@Programmer Physicist: Thank you! I went ahead and converted them into citations (if you use the visual editor, there's a really easy tool that'll automatically pull the citation data and create a more complete one than just a link). I'm not knowledgeable enough on the subject to necessarily comment on the accuracy of the article itself, but if you open a discussion on the talk page I'm sure there'll be some interest. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 22:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

So, that's how you do it properly - use Visual Editor! I'm back from the olden days when there was a lot of original research and almost no external sources. From now on I'm going to use Visual Editor to correctly insert citations. And I would definitely like to start a discussion on that topic but my biggest problem is the lack of time :( But you'll see anyway - anything I added with your help will be deleted, sooner or later - it's another polically correct utopia, unfortunately, where big companies make really big money. Just like it was with leaded gasoline - for years we've been told it's completely harmless. If nuclear enegery is barely holding in the U.S. and Germany is phasing it out completely we can't do anything here. But it was worhty a try and yeah - thank you very much for your help. I hit "thank you" link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Programmer Physicist (talk • contribs) 00:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Reese's edit

Hi Thadeus,

I'm confused as to why you reverted my edit to the Reese's Whipps page. Would a citation help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.39.71.158 (talk) 23:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@38.39.71.158: Yes - You've previously been blocked for making unsourced claims on similar articles. If you'd like to make the addition, you need to provide a source for what you're saying. You can see how to do that at WP:T ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 23:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

It is blatant vandalism, and the IP just came off of a block for making the identical edit. The IP is still blocked on another IP so this is block evasion. IP, leave it alone or this will end up at SPI. Meters (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Or we'll get this page protected as the other pages are. Meters (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Meters: If it's the same IP why would it need to go to SPI? ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 23:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Same user, multiple IPs. Waited out a short block on this IP but still blocked on at least one other IP. Meters (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I'll see if I can track down the article which mentions this and I'll refrain from re-adding the bit until such time as I can confidently source it. Thank you guys for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.39.71.158 (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

See history of Reese's Pieces and Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. This stupidity has been going on for three weeks. I'm going to get any further IPs blocked or all the articles protected. Meters (talk) 00:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! I didn't realize how long it'd been going on, I'm surprised they didn't just put a temp-protection on all related articles. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Still going on. See User:Meters/Reese's hoax for summary. Meters (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Salvatore Palella page

Hi, there. I've got your message about Salvatore Palella pages. Unfortunately, this person have a scam-record. Please, could you explain, how to get information for you, to make you sure it's true.

1. At first: about Helbiz project. This person raised money by ICO in 2018 year and now deceived investors and delete all information about ICO. Here is described situation: http://hbznews.com/introduction. Please, take a 5 minutes to read information there. There are YouTube video, with Salvatore Palella where is clearly he is talking about Helbiz coin and Helbiz coin listing on crypto-exchanges. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us9Xj22LtCM&t=148s

Currently time, he and his company absolutely abandoned the project. Rename the Initial company with which they celebrated the ICO in Singapore HELBIZ MOBILITY SYSTEM PTE. LTD. to HBZ SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. Look the proof: https://opencorporates.com/companies/sg/201804871N

HBZ SYSTEMS PTE. LTD." now is struck off You can check information here: https://www.tis.bizfile.gov.sg.

Helbiz had created new companies in USA - Helbiz Inc and a few branches include Helbiz CA LLC and announced double IPO with NASDAQ and Borsa Italiana.

It's absolutely scam story. Mr. Palella spend money to hide all connection with it. He attracted 4 lawyers firm to take-down HBZnews, but he has no success with it.

We attract Spanish and Italian moderators to help him delete all connection with ICO in Wikipedia. Helbiz history have a lot information in the google, just try to find "Helbiz ICO" in google - there will be a lots of results

2. Second, about S.S.D. Acireale Calcio 1946. Look the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_8-iUJqDJY&feature=emb_logo with demonstrated agains Palella

3. Witamine. Look hear information. http://www.portalecreditori.it/procedura?id=VgMoWLXMY3 There are PDF with court decision.

Please, ask what information you need, to get, that this persons try to give money from investors and finally scammed they. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.162.37 (talk) 22:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

OPCW

False positive. I believe publicize, or even promulgate are more appropriate terms. Describe means outline of detail. Fake News Extinguisher (talk) 22:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Fake News Extinguisher, Good point - I think in common usage describe works better, but if you want to revert my edit feel free, and we'll see if anyone disagrees. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Or we could just leave it if you feel it is better with the world describe. It may have a wider meaning than I first anticipated. --Fake News Extinguisher (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

New England Kicker

It is significant that he is a member of a white supremacist organization. It also is cited. If you remove it again, it is a violation of 3RR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeeZee (talk • contribs) 00:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

GeeZee, {u|GeeZee}}, Since I've only reverted that edit twice I'm actually not in violation of 3RR. Either way, you're continuing to add improperly sourced information that's based on a Twitter post and original research, which is against WP:RS and means my reversions are allowed as an exception to 3RR. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

It's a photograph which is the same photograph as the second footnote in the article. It is not original research. Stop reverting. Take it to arb if you want. He's a white supremacist. What's your agenda?

GeeZee, The Twitter post you're linking too doesn't mention anything about his tattoo or membership in the III Percenters, which means that you're making a connection not made by any reliable source. I think the accusation that I somehow have an "agenda" to cover up white supremacy is laughable, and looking at my userpage would be enough to clear that up. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

I suggest this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeeZee (talk • contribs) 00:47, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

GeeZee If you'd like to try and resolve the dispute that's fine, you'll just need to open an RFC on the article's talk page about whether your proposed edit should go into the article or not. That'll bring uninvolved editors to voice their opinions. In the meantime, the page would be kept without your proposed edit. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Vandals

How are you getting them so fast? I get them within a few seconds and when I go to handle it, your name is all over it :) --Galendalia (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Galendalia, Haha thank you, I guess we've just been getting to them about the same time. Yesterday I spent 30 minutes getting to them a second too late to somebody else. It can be a vicious cycle :P ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 01:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Well slow it down. I am going through the CVU and I need to get 10 done, I only have 4 so far lol. --Galendalia (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @ThadeusOfNazereth:! I got what I needed you may now resume lmao! Have a great day! --Galendalia (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

i dont care — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eefsjieif (talk • contribs) 19:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Douglas V Mastriano

Please revert the removal of the medals edit back. The removed medals section has been deemed inappropriate and it is unsourced, there is currently an open sockpuppet investigation into the account linked with this and other edits. I've requested semiprotected status for for the article in an attempt to stop the disruptive editing. Hyderabad22 (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hyderabad22, Good catch, I supposed that's what I get for not scrolling all the way down on the diff page. Do you have a link to the sockpuppet investigation? ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 22:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

ThadeusOfNazereth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/F%26INerd is the current open investigation. Additionally you can see the discussion on this admins talk page here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47#Drwillow_SPI Hyderabad22 (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

4 Witnesses

All 4 new witnesses are not in the article. Is there a limit? Cox wasan (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Cox wasan, the edit I reverted listed Reade's neighbor, brother, and friend. The brother and friend are mentioned in the section "New York Times' investigative reporting," and the neighbor is listed in the section "Reade's account." ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 22:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Baruch Terrorist plot constitutes him as such

The only edit I made reflects his attempt to bomb London. A plot that is added already within the wiki but has been downplayed as something other than it is. Bombings, attempted or otherwise motivated by political reasoning consistutes the act as a form of terrorism by definition. This event should be placed in its own category and should not be swept under the vague section of contribution.

Reverting the edit only serves to further the downplaying of his actions. I will add more content to further expand on his plot to bomb London and labeling him as a terrorist does not take away from his other roles as activist and community organizer. It honestly deserves its own pagwe. What you are participating in is historical revisionism not enforcing wikipedia rules and I would like to see you defend the revision when the subject in question fits the textbook definition.

Thank you Somali Strawhat (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Somali Strawhat, The reason I reverted your edit is that the bombing plot isn't referred to as terrorism anywhere else on the page, and a quick Google search finds that the only sources describing him as a terrorist come from anti-semetic blogs, which aren't considered reliable sources per WP:RS. I see somebody else reverted your edits, so I think it would be best to put your concern on the article talk page where it'll get viewed by people more knowledgeable on the subject than me. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 17:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok, but if nobody classified a bombing motivated by political means as an act of terrorism, why would simply adding that which is a form of either anti semitism or vandalsim.

The Irgun group of which he was a part of participated in numerous barrel bombings as a form of retaliation to the Exodus incident. Some of these bombing killed children.

Thats terrorism, and the fact that he was arrested and the events were already documented on this wiki. Its a proper classification that was previously omitted for whatever reason. You do not need a reliable source for textbook definitions. Somali Strawhat (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn

Greetings! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed for the fastest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!). If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn page for installation instructions. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. Your feedback is much appreciated! JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

JamesHSmith6789, thanks! I'll check it out right now. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 22:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Please let me know what you think :) JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Depiction of Jesus

I found suspected vandalism you didn't see when reverting someone else.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Vchimpanzee, awesome, thank you! One of the biggest issues with the way we have to revert vandalism sometimes is that we can't see vandalism from earlier right away, so I'm really glad you caught that. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 01:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcoming 108.11.36.198

You welcomed this IP address for constructive edits, but the edits weren't constructive. Please review the edits a new editor makes before welcoming them. Sam-2727 (talk) 01:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Sam-2727, thanks for the heads up - I took a quick look and I'm not sure what I was doing there, I normally don't welcome unless I've reverted somebody's edits and looking at their edits with fresh eyes there were some definite WP:NPOV issues. I guess that's what I get for editing at 2 o'clock in the morning! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 01:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

ThadeusOfNazereth, no worries. You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Wikipediholic (: Sam-2727 (talk) 02:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn - important info to get back up and running

Hey! Thanks for testing RedWarn. This is an important message to notify you that effective immediately, you need to change your common.js. This is due to my usurp request to change my username from an alias, JamesHSmith6789, to a more identifiable one, Ed6767 being accepted.

To do this, edit your config.js and remove the existing RedWarn script line and replace it with this one:

importScript("User:Ed6767/redwarn.js");

Click here to edit your common.js

And, here's another reminder to please, please, leave feedback and report all bugs on the talk page. By reporting bugs, you can help get them fixed by the next daily release.

Also, if you're interested in live discussion regarding the development and help with using RedWarn, why not join our new Discord server. It's easy to sign up and you can get help and chat with other RedWarn users.

Again, thank you so much for being willing to beta test RedWarn! I really appreciate it. Ed6767 (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

A message from Ed6767 about RedWarn

RedWarn - user feedback needed!

Hello RedWarn tester! I hate to reitterate, but thank you so much for being willing to test RedWarn, I really appreciate it.

In the past few updates, I have added AIV (admin) reporting, a preferences panel, themes, customisation options and made many, many bug fixes and added many features based on your suggestions and feedback.

Unfortunately, recently feedback has run dry.

Even if you do not use RedWarn at the moment, or you do (tysm), I would greatly appreciate feedback of any kind. While I go round Twinkle users, sounding like that broadband salesperson in the mall that nobody ever wants to speak to, I'd like some updated feedback from recent and current users.

Any sort of feedback below would be greately appreciated!

• Your first impressions when you tried RedWarn?
• How have you used RedWarn as time has gone on?
• Would you value customisation features, such as macros or shortcuts, such as adding your own quick revert reasons so the tool can fit your exact editing practices?
• Any suggestions for how I could promote the tool to a wider audience?
• Would you appreciate a more developed and thorough user guide?
• Any theme suggestions?
• Anything you'd like changing?
• Something you've always wanted to see in an anti-vandal tool? (I might add it!)
• RedWarn app?
• A way to introduce Recent Changes patrol to new users to make using RedWarn or other tools less daunting?
• Any bugs, gripes, or things that just really annoy you about RedWarn?

Click the button below to begin a new section on the talk page

Leave Feedback

My goal is to create the most user friendly moderation tool, and that's why I need your feedback to help make this truely the most favorable anti-vandal tool. While we will never elliminate vandalism on this site, we can get closer to fighting it quickly and easily.

Many thanks for your continued support. Ed6767 (talk) 00:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

If you do not wish to get these feedback reminders, let me know on my talk page.

A Valid link was provided,

Dear brother, You deleted an edit, without STUDY or being an EARTH XXI Citizen, as such without being, and possible thus unaware of the civil changes and without the correct civil study necessary to know and understand the specific supranational change, and without checking the SUPREME COUNCIL of HUMANITY members listed in the linked part edited.

www.glob-use.org

thus, until know better it is unwise to remove the edits.

with more experience you would know the edit was valid.

not having the experience does not qualify you to remove the edits made.

Thank you for your understanding,

HRH Prince Muhammad Jeseus Chrishna Universal State of EARTH (U S E) Supreme Council of Humanity (Committee of Experts) UN-ECOSOC SCS SDC UNESC Member NUMBER ID. 242-200421 and Director of the U S E-W P F All-Planetary Civil Education Coordination Center.

Peace, be upon you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.83.192.146 (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

36.83.192.146, your source doesn't appear to pass WP:RS muster after a cursory glance, and your edit is chock-full of grammatical errors that make it impossible to include on the wiki in its current form. If you sincerely believe what you have should be on the page, you can petition for it on the article's talk page. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

your comment - Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Supranational law.

Untrue Sir.

for and in the construction of the future beyond the current limitations of the old article that was written with lesser experience and thus also lesser understanding on the subject. The final edit also was without grammatical errors.

pardon my ALL UPPERCASE CAPITAL LETTERS at the beginning merely putting emphasis on what was added to the article however I did go back and change it.

Yes I sincerely believe it should be included, to help the world unite and consolidate in the now XXI/21st century.

That which was added is already agreed upon by many other professors, philosophers, nobel laureates, and international gusi peace prize laureates from all around the world.

with a little more research rather than a cursory glance you would or will realise this.

I might add rather than putting so much effort into the removal of it, if you would as much effort into trying keep the edit there you would be doing the world a better service.

Perhaps even you might join the Earth XXI Citizenship at some point and write such a better article yourself in service to humanity and this bright blue green planet we live on.

Your service would be most welcome.

Regardless of all the different fluff and muster to remove the edit, a complement to you brother as it seems to be that you are one that knows how to get past all that so that something so wonderfully world changing would have great effect via wikipedia (I admit I am new to it) perhaps out of the kindness of your heart you may look through the edits and research more to make the edit correct to stay on the article page or write a new better even more informative one that would help draw people's attention to the wonder of the new higher Earth solution that is the U S E.

Thank you, thank you, thank you

In highest Regards

MJC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.83.192.146 (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Adam Riess

Dear Wikipedia

My name is Adam Riess and I am an American Astrophysicist and winner of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery of the accelerating Universe and Dark Energy.

I recently noticed that there have been two efforts to “vandalize” my wikipedia entry

1). A user name BattleOrc (who I understand to be (Redacted)) has been putting in a section called “Controversy” about his teams work denying the existence of dark Energy. They are free to have their own opinion, but they are fringe and my bio entry is not an appropriate place to air their grievances and dispute with the Nobel Prize.

I have removed this section and explained why in the comments but BattleOrc keeps restoring it.

2) A section on the Calan/Tololo Survey seeking credit for the Nobel work. The Calan/Tololo Project has its own wikipedia entry and that is the appropriate place to discuss it. Not my bio entry.

I have removed this section (writing as 130.167.171.156) but BattleOrc keeps restoring it.

I consider these attempts to settle scores or air grievances in my biographical entry in appropriate at best and libelous at worst. My bio entry should be simple and to the point and not have sections on other people’s diatribes, respectfully.

I kindly request that my entry is “frozen” so that it can’t be edited again by BattleOrc.

Best Adam Riess — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.167.171.156 (talk) 02:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

130.167.171.156, I appreciate your detailed explanation. I’m currently at work away from my computer but when I get home tommorow I’ll read through the sources BattleOrc added and try to write up an WP:RPP request. You will probably have the best luck posting a thread at WP:ANI, so that an actual administrator can intervene.

I will say that generally if there is controversy surrounding someone’s research that would be included in an article, but a search from my phone didn’t actually turn up anything on you so I doubt that’ll end up being an issue. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Adam Riess. While you are free to disclose your own identity, please do not speculate on the identity of other editors unless they have voluntarily disclosed it per WP:OUTING. If you have information concerning someone's identity that concerns us, please email it to an administrator or perhaps arbcom. Take a read of the earlier linked section on outing, as well as WP:COI for further information about how to deal with such matters. Nil Einne (talk) 05:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

130.167.171.156, I finally got a chance to take a look and it looks like you were correct. Unless something changes, the "Controversy" section has been removed and most of the criticism was removed as well for being original research (the sources didn't support the claims). Anything else will eventually get figured out as editors come and go from the page, but I'll keep an eye on it for the next week or so. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 11:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Justin Rohrwasser

And after all that effort that you put in, telling me that his college's official photo wasn't evidence that he had a three percent tattoo, guess what happened?

Good job protecting a white supremacist, Thadeus. You won your little wiki battle. But you lost the war. Good always will triumph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeeZee (talk • contribs) 04:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

GeeZee, this is how Wikipedia works. If you look at the source list for Justin Rohrwasser, you'll note that neither Twitter or his college's official photo is used as a source. If you had taken the fifteen extra seconds to find a source that passed WP:RS muster, you wouldn't have been blocked. I'll refer you to WP:RGW and, given that you've very nearly accused me of being a white supremacist, tell you to not comment on my talk page about your edits to that page again. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 21:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn rev13

Hello! I noted your feedback from the end of April, and in the latest version of RedWarn, it will automatically select a level based on a users past warnings! I did in the end decide to enable it by default, along with automatically selecting a rationale for vandalism and unexplained content reverts. Thanks so much for your feedback! If you have any more, please let me know. Ed6767 (talk) 01:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn - Quick Survey

Hello ThadeusOfNazereth! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.

To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey

Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Not a lot of people hold beliefs like you do and I commend you for staying true to who you are in this day and age. I wish you countless healthy years. Dub1zero6 (talk) 06:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ronald Reagan on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Militarization of police on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello ThadeusOfNazereth,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nick Searcy

Hi, I deleted the vandalism by 50.39.103.254. I do have a Wikipedia account and have been editing often for over ten years. The reason I did not log in before reverting is because my Wiki account uses my real name, and I am an author of some note. Regardless of my work, I have concerns that whoever vandalized the Searcy article may look for retribution. Searcy is a polarising figure re politics, and after he posted a screen capture of the vandalism, I simply wanted to bring his article back to Wiki standards without possibly putting my family, work, or reputation in jeopardy of social media stalkers. I hope you understand. Thanks. 131.179.61.12 (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know - I'll keep an eye on the article to see what happens with it. Smart of you to log out first, I've had people harass me on my personal Instagram before because of vandalism reverts. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Reverse racism on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Clock

Hey. I noticed you reverted an IP users additions to clock as vandalism. You've been here longer than me but I just wanted to point out that it does appear that Benjamin Banneker built the first clock, or at least is suspected to. Thanks! -OXYLYPSE (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

OXYLYPSE, that might be true (I am by no means a clock expert), but the insertion at the front of the lead would need to be rolled back regardless because it's out of place and breaks the flow of the article. Thanks for letting me know about marking it vandalism, I need to do a better job of using RedWarns other rollback options :P ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 16:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

No worries, just wanted to point that out :). I'm quite enjoying RedWarn myself. Take care! - OXYLYPSE (talk) 21:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

IGR J11014−6103 article

Ok. I wrote the Wiki article but in hindsight you are correct. The article the way it was/is conveys information well. I'm in a tizzy because I've figured out what causes the jets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.150.58.4 (talk) 01:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

CentristPOV and reply

I made an edit to a page where it was left off that Antifa is a far left terrorist organization and it was removed even though it is. If this site allows leftists to add far right, neo-Nazi and other unfounded misinformation why is a proven fact removed as being “not neutral”?

@CentristPOV: If you can point me to any actual "misinformation" relating to neo-Nazi groups, I would be more than happy to revert it for you. As it stands, Antifa isn't categorized as a "terrorist organization" by Wikipedia, because there isn't a consensus as to whether it actually is one or not. Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia - We do not make any conclusions for ourselves, rather, we collect and present information from a variety of sources. Both the pages Antifa (Germany) and Antifa (United States) discuss the allegations of terrorist activity. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 07:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Page protection request

I believe I accidentally deleted your two requests. Would you like me to restore them? --David Tornheim (talk) 00:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

David Tornheim, it looks like you did, but at least one of the pages was protected and the vandalism slowed on the other, so don't worry about it :) Thanks for letting me know! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me!

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear ThadeusOfNazereth,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sergei Millian on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:National Rally on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Eleni Kounalakis on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:David Zuckerman (politician) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taiwan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kiki Camarena on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Governor General of Canada on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andy Ngo on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Communism on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:New York City Police Department on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI ThadeusOfNazereth/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

I appreciate your additions to the page I submitted, as well as the tip on sourcing. It's always nice to see fellow anarchists on here. Veganbikepunk (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by "living or recently deceased"

You wrote on my talk page.SweetMilkTea13 (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

@SweetMilkTea13: That's just the template message, the template can be used in response to edits on a living persons page or somebody who has recently died. I reverted your edit because, while I don't doubt that Sloan harbors extremely racist views, he isn't described as a "Nazi" or "white supremacist" anywhere else in the article, and we have to maintain WP:NPOV. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 03:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please elaborate on your comments ~~

Hi, could you elaborate on the comments you left for me? I am not sure what my actual mistake is. I'd like to make corrections. ThanksCYTurkey (talk) 00:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

@CYTurkey: The edit you made adding "Lawyer" to the infobox was fine! I reverted because your second edit, which added some information, didn't follow the citation format. You just copy-pasted the url, which can mess up the flow of the page. WP:CS has a lot of information on how to create citations, but the easiest thing to do is use the "Cite" button at the top of the editor. If you click that, it'll open a tutorial to create a proper citation. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 01:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello ThadeusOfNazereth,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Respectfully

Respectfully, I think you made a mistake. Can you please review your rejection of Draft:Jon Dalzell, and approve it? He qualifies under the wp basketball notability rules. WP:NBASKETBALL. Because he played in the Israeli Basketball Premier League. --2604:2000:E010:1100:8813:945C:33AD:2B50 (talk) 19:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

@2604:2000:E010:1100:8813:945C:33AD:2B50: Done - I must've jumped completely over the mention of the Israeli league when I reviewed the guidelines. If you get a chance, please update the Eurobasket source so that it is a link to his actual page - The URL is redirecting to a 404 page. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 19:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try - but I am confused as to how that happens. I accessed the information which was clearly shown and copied the url from that page today, but as you say when it is accessed through the article it redirects to a 404 page - even though it worked when I accessed it. Confused as to how to fix it. 2604:2000:E010:1100:8813:945C:33AD:2B50 (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Request clarification

Hi,

Thanks for the review and comments (and sadly, rejection of) the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kamal_Mallick#cite_ref-2

WRT your comments: Reference 2: is actually a live site that mentions the date of death of all well known musicians in the obituary page. So, your comment that it is dead may not be entirely correct.

"Sangeet Piyasi : Official website". sangeetpiyasi.org. Retrieved 2020-10-18. : 

http://sangeetpiyasi.org/obituary.html

Reference 3 is a Newspaper clip depicting the President of India honouring the subject of the page being written for [October 1959. {Jugantar 27 Oct 1959, Pg 1}]. This newspaper does not have an online archive and I'd like to request you to tell me how else can I use this reference as?

I have also included many links to his great body of work under external links.

Any other suggestions for improving the page are welcome.

WikiArnabB (talk) 06:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

@WikiArnabB:, thank you for that info. For whatever reason, I am getting a "Server Error in '/' Application" when I try to access that page. As for the newspaper article, I recommend trying to upload it to https://archive.org. The sources you've added in the "External Links" section look good, but usually external links aren't evaluated as references. Perhaps creating a "Compositions" section with a list of those pieces and the articles discussing them linked would let you beef up the references list. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 06:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

18th December, 2020 Hi, thank you for the advice. As suggested, I have moved reference 3 to archive.com and linked it on the reference. I have also moved some of the notabe External links to the main body - especially those where a popular newspaper has mentioned the person / performance in a published article and given the relevant links. I am hoping these should suffice.

With special regard to the obituary note, I just checked it again and it is opening smoothly on all systems/devices/browsers in my residence and among my friends I sent it to. The website http://sangeetpiyasi.org/ lists most of the musical geniuses from the field Indian Classical Music in their Obituary section. I wonder why you are unable to open it. I could send you a screenshot, but this window doesn't allow images.

Looking forward to your review and further advice/approval. Regs WikiArnabB (talk) 07:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Cite Unseen update

Hello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. The script recently received a significant update, detailed below.

• You can now toggle which icons you do or don't want to see. See the configuration section for details. All icons are enabled by default except for the new generally reliable icon (described below).
• New categorizations/icons:
  • Advocacy: Organizations that are engaged in advocacy (anything from political to civil rights to lobbying). Note that an advocacy group can be reliable; this indicator simply serves to note when a source's primary purpose is to advocate for certain positions or policies, which is important to keep in mind when consuming a source.
  • Editable: Sites that are editable by the public, such as wikis (Wikipedia, Fandom) or some databases (IMDb, Discogs).
  • Predatory journals: These sites charge publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy.
  • Perennial source categories: Cite Unseen will mark sources as generally reliable, marginally reliable, generally unreliable, deprecated, and blacklisted. This is based on Wikipedia's perennial sources list, which reflects community consensus on frequently discussed sources. Sources that have multiple categorizations are marked as varied reliability. Note that generally reliable icons are disabled by default to reduce clutter, but you can enable them through your custom config. A special thanks to Newslinger, whose new Sourceror API provides the perennial sources list in a clean, structured format.
• With the addition of the new categorizations, the biased source icon has been removed. This category was very broad, and repetitive to the new advocacy and perennial sources categorizations that are more informative.

If you have any feedback, requested features, or domains to add/remove, don't hesitate to bring it up on the script's talk page. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

You are receiving this message as a user of Cite Unseen. If you no longer wish to receive very occasional updates, you may remove yourself from the mailing list.

YAL Article

Hi Thaddeus, I understand that the tweets may not be seen as a good source for the current allegations concerning the YAL. However, would this article from the Liberty Herald count as a credible enough source reporting on the allegations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanlhew (talk • contribs) 03:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kanlhew:, First of all, thank you for finding that - I'm not involved in the LP anymore, and I didn't even think of finding LP-connected news sources. While I cannot speak for the potential opinion of other editors, I think that would be fine as it's a fairly large blog (almost 16,000 subscribers on the email list), the blog has a history of publishing news of interest to libertarians, and the article itself does not take a stance. If you'd like to reinstate your edits, replacing the tweet link with that article, that would be fine. I will see if I can find any other sources as well. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

UPDATE: I went ahead and did this myself - If you find anything else feel free to add it! ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 04:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Help with creating new section.

Can you create a new section "controversies" for the accusations on Kristen Clarke? Abedidos (talk) 07:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks - article (Patrick McGrath Irish Republican)

I appreciate your edits and comments. I'm pretty new to this system of creating articles. I submitted the article many months ago and didn't have much faith in the approval process. I tried to include a photo of Paddy McGrath but found it impossible to do. The photo was used in multiple newspaper articles about McGrath but I couldn't figure out how the system worked so I left it out. Do you have any suggestions on how I can navigate the photo insertion process? Again, thanks for your help.Palisades1 (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Palisades1:, while I’m not 100% certain as it’s not my area of expertise, you would no need to go through the process at WP:UPIMAGES and ask any questions that arise as you do that at WP:HELPDESK. The biggest thing when uploading images is making sure that they’re copyright free, which many old images are. In Ireland, I know that if photos are available in museums they are public domain, but you’d have to research your own rules to make sure. If the newspapers are publicly available, though, I’m sure that the images are as well.

I appreciate you sticking through the process - We have a perpetual backlog, but everything eventually gets looked at! Hopefully if you stick around, it’ll be something that interests you one day :) ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 19:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for working to help keep the encyclopedia free from non-constructive edits! LizardJr8 (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@LizardJr8:, we awarded each other at the same time! I pressed submit on your page and had a notification for this when it finished loading. It's much appreciated :) ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I saw that, LOL! LizardJr8 (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

hi Thadeus,

thanks for monitoring page changes so vigilantly; sorry I didn't include my edit summary. I removed three references that undermined the page's neutrality (opinion pieces from yovenice.com and venicecurrent.com were cited as facts), and removed one redundancy ("he is gay" in the opening paragraph was redundant when his sexuality, marriage, and husband are discussed in his personal life section). can you please restore the changes I made? thank you.

Ilovelosangeles95 (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Ilovelosangeles95, I'm taking a look right now - I actually meant to look over the page history because I thought it seemed a bit weird, but it must've slipped my mind. ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ilovelosangeles95:, while I haven't 100% restored your edits, the article should be more balanced now and the inappropriate material in the lead was removed. If you want to make further edits, feel free! Just make sure you leave an edit summary :) ThadeusOfNazereth^Talk to Me! 00:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

It looks great - thanks so much! Ilovelosangeles95 (talk) 02:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Steelpillow deleted articles on 2nd and 3rd generation fighter aircraft. He removed the the table that was put to differentiate among 4 generation aircrafts. Zafarhamza261 (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC) Zafarhamza261 (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi ThadeusOfNazereth. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	ThadeusOfNazereth: We appreciate your attention to detail on out Point La Vista Cape article which examines the biography of land occupation Timucua Natives to 20th Century in Jax, FL. We'll keep trying to strengthen the Citation Section. Thanks for the helping hand. PointLaVista (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Senator's votes

Hi ThadusofNazareth! Thank you for the kind message; I was in the middle of a username change so things were a bit tricky. My background is in Journalism so I've been lamenting the loss of information in articles in recent years. I think the lack of information and background in a lot of stories is detrimental to our society because it doesn't allow us to gain a full view of why certain people or populations behave the way they do. I'm never going to be thrilled with all the choices any President makes but I think understanding the reasoning behind each decision goes a long way into a deeper understanding of each person. If you're open to it, I would love to brainstorm ways that information can be mentioned as objectionably as possible. I think it's important that readers understand the context. Ataneq (talk) 06:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

1. "Practice Guidelines for Chronic Pain ManagementAn Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine*". Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 112 (4): 810–833. 2010-04-01. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c43103. ISSN 0003-3022.
2. Ishizaki N, Yano T, Kawakita K (December 2010). "Public status and prevalence of acupuncture in Japan". Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 7 (4): 493–500. doi:10.1093/ecam/nen037. PMC 2892353. PMID 18955345.