An article you recently created, Elvis Justice, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pridemanty (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback and for moving the article to the draft space. I sincerely apologize for any shortcomings in the article and understand the importance of verifiability and reliable citations on Wikipedia. I will carefully review and improve the draft by adding more citations from reliable, independent sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Once I have addressed these concerns, I will resubmit the article for review. I truly appreciate your guidance and patience as I work to enhance the draft.Sweetabena (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kwame Asare Obeng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Thank you for reaching out! I noticed that the article about "RG Qluck Wise" has already been created on the French Wikipedia. I attempted to translate it into English using the beta translation tool, but unfortunately, the page is currently protected, which prevented me from making the necessary edits.
It might be helpful for you to check with the French Wikipedia community to understand why the page is protected. Once the protection is lifted or further clarification is provided, I'll be happy to assist with the translation.
Feel free to keep me updated on any developments, and I'll be glad to help once the issue is resolved!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Josedimaria were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kojo Yankson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for reviewing my submission, Draft:Kojo Yankson. I understand the concerns regarding the lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. I will work on gathering additional references that meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and revise the draft accordingly.
If you have any specific suggestions or examples of the type of sources needed, I would appreciate the guidance. Thank you for your time and feedback.
Hello, Sweetabena!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jõséhola08:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message and guidance. I’ll visit the Articles for Creation help desk and the Teahouse for support in improving my draft. I appreciate the resources and assistance offered to editors like me.
Hi. I've moved this article to draft space because even the early versions are written in a promotional tone. Other editors have made it far worse since then. Please could you work on it in draft to remove the promotional content and then submit for review. Deb (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message and for your efforts in reviewing the article. I understand your concerns about the tone, but I respectfully believe that the article Afua Assntewaa should not have been moved to draft space.
I have worked hard to ensure the article reflects notable achievements in a factual and neutral manner, and I believe it meets the basic criteria for a Wikipedia article. While I acknowledge that some early versions may have been edited with more promotional language, I have made revisions and would be happy to work further to address any issues that may remain.
Rather than moving the article to draft space, I would appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you and other editors to refine the article directly in the main space. I am open to suggestions on how we can remove any remaining promotional content while still ensuring the article remains informative and neutral.
Please let me know if you are open to working together to improve the article. I value constructive feedback and am committed to making sure the content adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines.Sweetabena (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
