User talk:Supersaiyen312

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Just a quick explanation and note here, for anyone confused or wondering what's going on, you can ask me any questions here and I can also be reached by email. After discussion with HJ Mitchell, I was unblocked so I could start a WP:clean start and I also notified Callanecc and Elockid. At Callanecc's suggestion, I also notified ArbCom. The clean start account was supposed to be Xharm. I am now currently discussing the block and should leave any updates about it here. Again, if you want to ask any questions, I'll answer it. I can also be reached by email. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are indefinitely blocked.

Hello, Supersaiyen312, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips
  How to write a great article
  Simplified Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Abductive (reasoning) 02:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Abductive. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Supersaiyen312. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 01:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tito Dutta (contact) 01:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Suicide in Greenland

Harrias talk 16:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tricorn band

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tricorn band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correction

I violated the spirit, not the letter, of the 3RR; you violated the letter of the rule.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly do you mean by the spirit? 3 reverts is still 3 reverts, which is exactly what you did. I technically did not revert you on that 2nd and 3rd edit, not really completely anyway. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 01:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I went up to the limit, not over it. Your argument over technicalities is of a similar nature. Indeed, edit warring can result in sanctions even without going above 3 reverts.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I guess I get it now. But that also means I also went up to the limit, not over it (the self-revert was going over it however). Indeed, I wasn't the one that started or initiated the edit warring either so now lets leave it at that. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 02:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you're right; for some reason I thought you did four reverts.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request regarding recent edit

Thank you for improving the lead section to Rola (model). Recently, there has been a lack of consensus on the specific details regarding her mother's heritage due to an issue I have raised in the talk section. A quick justification of your recent edit in the talk section would be greatly appreciated in order to form a consensus and hopefully bring this minor issue to a close. Thank you in advance, sorry for the inconvenience JTST4RS (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion involving the Yasukuni Shrine lead

Hi, I've opened a discussion at the Yasukuni Shrine talk page about the lead.Zmflavius (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly

stop making major edits to the 2014WC without even bothering to discuss them on the talk page? Nergaal (talk) 09:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a major edit, it's already on its own relevant article along with others similar to it. This should be no exception. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK then, so we should also add the images of the other referees and players too. The Nishimura image for example is from 2010 of a different match. Regarding Luis Suárez (which is an image from 2011), the Igor Akinfeev's image should also be added, along with Serbian referee Milorad Mažić. But we should use images FROM the 2014 game, not unrelated images from different occasions in the past. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You raise a valid point in that those images are from unrelated games. Sorry if I sounded angry in my attitude. I agree with you. I've removed factual information per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Avoid entering textual information as images. Heymid (contribs) 12:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, much better. Thanks. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 FIFA World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter O'Leary
List of 2014 FIFA World Cup controversies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter O'Leary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Not what the source says."

Please explain this edit. Are you denying that Seokwoo says that China "has asserted its claims to the islands since that time"? Λυδαcιτγ 18:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Audacity: Actually, I just reread it. No, that's not what I meant, although the previous version is misleading regarding to the point. I will revert it back for now, I don't have time to argue about this, and I have no intention to edit war on this. I have other things to do. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
However, I am keeping consistent with Lee Seokwoo. One of the source failed to verify the misleading claim of the supposed US "proposal" to handover Ryukyu Islands/Okinawa in the 1970, which is what it was administered as. First of all, look at the cited date. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All right, thanks. I'm not familiar with the obviously contentious history of the article, so I'm sorry if I missed something that's been talked about already in the past. I also didn't mean to revert your linking of the countries in the lede, so I'll redo that. Cheers, Λυδαcιτγ 07:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Air Flight 655

Except for housekeeping, such as spelling fixes or citation cleanup, a page under full protection shouldn't be edited unless people agree at the talk page. Please start a discussion at the talk page, and I'll happily add it if people agree with your idea. Nyttend (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Can you help me?

Fisrst of all i'm not from Florence area.You wrote about me in Potential superpowers talk something that i never wrote (EU must replace USA and similar things).Did you read my profile?So please help me to correct Italy aricle (see Talk) .I'm not able to realize what i've to do.I just ask repect for an invalid person like me.About Sock i promise to do it no more( even if don't realize well what about i'm guilty).Please help me how acting,i'm bipolar and invalid.If you do not accept invalid people i'll act in different ways,be sure. Robert McClenon already followed my particular case and he knew all about me.So why did you act so?I've already warned McClenon.Gladio4772 (talk) 11:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to robert Mc Clenon that already all about me.You discovered nothing reading 64......I'm not from Florence too.It seems you don't like respect for invalid people.I'm asking you.Do you want to open a case on civil behaviour in this site?I will make respect my situation,be sure.I've always asked McClenon and others how acting and they know all about me.I asked you for help and you didn't answer.In EU it's a right for invalid people to stay in the society (real and virtual).I don't know in USA.Here YES by law!Gladio4772 (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gladio4772:, why are you bringing up Robert McClenon? I checked your page and Robert McClenon did not say anything about this. You need to contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee via email if your main account User:Mediolanum is blocked. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


True. As Supersaieyen312 knows, I cautioned Gladio4772, advising collaborative editing, and warning him that disruptive editing, including allegations of vandalism in a content dispute, would result in blocks. I said nothing about geolocation, and said nothing about bipolar disorder. Wikipedia's policy is that mentally different editors (Asperger's, bipolar) may edit if they can comply with policies and guidelines. (Some mentally different editors make excellent editors. Some mentally different editors make terrible editors.) I also said nothing about sock-puppetry. There have been many allegations of sock-puppetry with regard to Russia, and I support any blocking of sock-puppets. Robert McClenon (talk)

I seems you have no respect for my particular situation,but behind virtual life there is real life.Wonderful to see this in newspapers.McClenon you read all about post of 64..... because you warned him (only) when he vandalized my profile.You said nothing about it.I've serious problems as invalid to relate with people here.Are they respecting me?Even other people know about me.This is the reality.I promised you to act in a correct way and i asked you for it.And you gave me suggeststhat i well accepted.I log out and stop.Really a low place this one!Gladio4772 (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for reading my battle over nothingness!

Doctor Kaiju (talk) 11:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Technophant

Thank you, that was sweet of you. I think he is being given a hard time and it is having a very bad effect on him. You need to be tough to stand up to things in Wikipedia and not be ground down! He has been perfectly well-behaved on the Iraq pages, and I think a lot of the trouble has stemmed from the alternative medicine page he edits. I do believe that Wikipedia are biased against alternative medicine and make things difficult for those who edit on it. So much for NPOV! But that is just my opinion! --P123ct1 (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS

Hello, Supersaiyen, just a small point on the wikilink change in Amnesty International: you may not be aware but there is, in fact, a Wiki article on this organisation! --P123ct1 (talk) 06:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I un-linked Amnesty International it because was marked as unsourced and made the paragraph easier to read per WP:Overlinking in the article. Too many links can make the lead hard to read. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Supersaiyen312: I understand. I see you've changed the box in s.12 to make the UN a separate category, which would be okay if the UN had actually formally designated ISIS as a terrorist organisation, but in fact they haven't, or at least no-one can find a UN document saying this, unlike for those other countries which have all issued docs which clearly make a formal designation. That strange UN document you have in the footnote which was initially cited as evidencing this can't be used as it doesn't make any kind of designation, nor does the doc in the link provided at the bottom of that sheet. There was a brief discussion about all this on the Talk page (see #8 and #43) but much more importantly in the link that Dougweller gave in #43, where there is a discussion which I think proves conclusively that this sheet can't be used to back up an assertion that the UN have made a formal designation. So I think the UN will have to go from that box. It has already gone from the country list of formal designations in the Lead because of this. I would take it out myself if I wasn't up against a 1RR - (this 1RR rule is slowing down things a lot; I'm sure editing would go along a lot faster if we weren't hampered by using up our 1RRs every day) - but obviously you must do what you think is best. Very few of us have said anything about this on the Talk page, so I'd be interested to hear what you think. --P123ct1 (talk) 08:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@P123ct1: I didn't put the United Nations Security Council on there. It was added by User:Indonesia124 right here, so you're going to have to go ask him about it. I only made it a different box. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 09:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Supersaiyen312: Sorry! At least I can use that argument with Indonesia124! --P123ct1 (talk) 09:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bias Opinion

Don't you think Blake Gripling for whatever reason is being biased on some articles a.e Sindikato Chveawful (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok for me to start a more concise article on the Sindikato if blake does succeed in deleting it,for me its injustice to hush up the fact that a group well organized crime syndicates operates unimpeded in the Philippines i want to expose this if so can my article be safe from deletion whats the guidelines in particular is to be followed,i dont want my article to be deleted needlessly Chveawful (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/U for user Worldedixor problems

I started a discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Worldedixor to help address problems with this user. Please feel free to add your own issues in the appropriate sections, endorse, or add comments on the talk page.~Technophant (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam war

WW II mentions the Holocaust and the number of Holocaust deaths in the lead. The Vietnam war lead should at least mention that war crimes were committed by both sides, given that one of the belligerents, the US, is a democratic nation founded upon the rule of law.OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for all the arguing over the war crimes issue. I just felt very strongly about this issue. I did not intend to Wikilawyer by placing the call for war crimes sections in multiple war articles. I was just interested in multiple war articles, with the same issue. Next time I will consolidate my discussion on a single location.OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS infoboxes

Thanks for splitting the countries from the organisations in the terrorist designation section. That is a much more rational arrangement. Do you know how to adjust the overall and cell dimensions of the organization box, to make them match the country box dimensions? --P123ct1 (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me on this. Never thought of a technical hitch like that, as I am fairly computer-illiterate. Never mind! At least it is better than it was. :) --P123ct1 (talk) 09:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Foreign rebel fighters in the Syrian Civil War

aH, My bad. dint want to start a small section. but its also a government reaction and not just passage to Syria. Either way, feel free to change it.

Its still a very small section. so don't know what to do.Lihaas (talk) 11:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
NP Lihaas (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Offer unblock request for Technophant

Technophant (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Technophant has requested an unblock under the standard offer. As one of about 60 editors who has contributed to User talk:Technophant you may have an interest in this request. Sent by user:PBS via -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]