User talk:Gladio4772

Welcome

Hello Gladio4772, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Gladio4772, good luck, and have fun. – Robert McClenon (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of Vandalism

The issue about the ranking of Russia in terms of GDP is a content dispute. Disputed content is not vandalism. The incorrect allegation of vandalism is a personal attack on the other editors involved in the content dispute. Take the content dispute to dispute resolution. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here we have standard data that are used for ALL nations.They are data of IMF April 2014.They can't be argued.Math is Math.People by a vandalic act unlocked Russia article and posted it 8th (before it was posted 8th in the right way).Dispute can't be on official numbers of the same organization that is used in all Wikipedia article.Gladio4772 (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the definition of vandalism as defined by Wikipedia. If it is a good faith conclusion, then it cannot be vandalism. Sure, one side could be wrong, but there has been no reason to think that anyone is acting out of bad faith here. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK ,we can say that they were wrong without bad feith writing that Russia is ranked 8th in 2014 as nominal gdp in the Russia article presentation and aside close the value 2092.So it's time now in good feith to correct article with 9th referred to ranking of nominal gdp.Thanks.Gladio4772 (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution Notice

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Gladio4772, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Gladio4772! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Portions of Russia, including the capital of Moscow, are in Eastern Europe as usually defined, so that disruptive editing may be subject to sanctions. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand all this.Please could you explain me?Why?I never wrote about Moscow or about some regions of Russia.Thanks)A guy with IP 198...... vandalized all my wall and my talk.How can i block him?He said me i'm from Florence,but he is wrong, i'm far from Florence at the borders between Romagna,Tuscany,Umbria and Marche.He is becoming really a vandal.Gladio4772 (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You did engage in a content dispute about the GDP of Russia. I see that your user page was vandalized, and I have warned that IP. Your talk page was not vandalized. A disruptive posting to a user talk page is not vandalism. If you make any further false allegations of vandalism, action can be taken against you. Your editing and his have both been disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain me when i've been disruptive?Just this to realize what is disruptive.I ask this to better my editing.Nothing else.Thanks).Gladio4772 (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You ask how your edits have been disruptive. You labeled a dispute as to the GDP ranking of Russia as vandalism. It was not. It was a content dispute. False allegations of vandalism are disruptive, and are personal attacks. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, and this is just the way it is, this is the English Wikipedia, not the Italian Wikipedia. Comments that are obviously hostile or personal attacks that are in broken English are even more disruptive than personal attacks that are in good English. Editors whose English is limited should be especially careful not to push the limits of civility. That may not seem fair, but it is just the way it is. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BEFORE THAN WRITING TO AVOID MISTAKES ON MY TALK READ ALWAYS MY PROFILE,PLEASE

Gladio4772 (talk) 09:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

64 or 198 or Whatever

You wrote on my talk page: "I think that 64..... that wrote on the Italy talk is the same person that wrote under the IP 198......I 've really no words for this behaviour that is beginning to disturb me.Thanks". You say that the behavior is starting to disturb you. I will point out that, until you registered your account, you were also editing as an extremely aggressive IP editor. If the behavior is starting to disturb you, please consider whether maybe your behavior has been disturbing other editors and should be changed. You have only two alternatives. You may learn to edit collaboratively, including discussing issues without personal attacks and without calling content disputes vandalism. Instead, you can face a series of escalating blocks. Those are your only choices. You can't get what you want in Wikipedia by personal attacks and harsh demands. Work out your issue about GDP ranking collaboratively, or be blocked. Those are your choices. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just ask respect for an invalid person whose ill hits humour.Nothing else.Thanks.Gladio4772 (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits Gladio4772 on Potential Superpowers and Russia for ip hoping

Gladio4772 your not fooling anybody with your ip hoping pushing on your anti Russian statements on the same subjects, your history as 151.40.13.125 for disruptive ip hoping on these discussions, speaking against Russia in all ip’s I found below you have been using. All the same editor, all ip addresses are from Florence Italy. I am reporting and discrediting your comments from the discussion since it is all the same wording slamming disruptive edits against Russia since 2013 that this is not effective when users like this are disruptive and are doing the opposite. Here is your list with links of the contributes starting July 8, 2014‎ - 151.40.13.161[1] , July 7, 2014 151.40.45.125[2], March 17, 2014 - 151.40.95.82[3], April 2013 - Bocca Trabaria[4], March 2014 - 151.40.24.9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/151.40.24.9], March 2014 -151.40.7.192[5], Sept 23, 2013 - 151.40.18.30[6], Sept 15, 2013 - 151.40.55.125[7], March 18, 2014 - 151.40.35.236[8], March 18, 2014 - 151.40.9.149[9], March 17, 2014 - 151.40.72.141[10], March 16, 2014 - 151.40.14.179[11], March 16, 2014 - 151.40.83.17[12], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.69.199[13], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.34.218[14], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.120.19[15], Feb 4, 2014 - 151.40.63.30[16], Feb 4, 2014- 151.40.16.167[17], Dec 28, 2013 - 151.40.107.93[18], Dec 27, 2013 - 151.40.27.25[19], Dec 27, 2013 - 151.40.64.77[20], Dec 25, 2013 - 151.40.54.32[21], Dec 23, 2013 - 151.40.41.170[22], Dec 22, 2013 - 151.40.9.139[23], Sept 8, 2013 - 151.40.102.200[24], August 14, 2013 - 151.40.125.50[25], May 10, 2013 – Mediolanum[26], Oct 22, 2013 - Glc72[27], May 21, 2013 - 151.40.11.180[28], May 14, 2013 -151.40.59.151[29], May 14, 2013 - 151.40.60.108[30], May 11, 2013 - Bocca_Trabaria[31]

Gladio4772, what is your next ip and user name going to be next, share I continue to find you and what your doing, reporting you in each and everytime.--64.129.3.198 (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my profile before than do this.Gladio4772 (talk) 07:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SOCK Login to your User:Mediolanum‎ account and post an unblock request, you need to promise no more socking or legal threats to be taken seriously. Any comments you post to the talk page of PS will be reverted on sight, sockpuppets do not have the privilege of editing. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 10:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


First of all i'm not from Florence second i promise you to act in a correct way as i promised to Robert McClenon.He already knows all about me.Gladio4772 (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your profile says you are from the Tuscany (Toscana) region, which has the capital of Florence. Your various IP addresses also traces back to there.[32] Robert McClenon did not say anything about this. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
First, it appears that he is saying that he is geolocated somewhere in Tuscany other than Florence. That doesn't matter. Second, as Supersayien312 knows, I only cautioned him to edit collaboratively, saying that if he continued to call content disputes vandalism, he would face escalating blocks. Third, if he is a sock-puppet of a blocked or banned user (and I have not researched that question), he has no editing privilege and may be reverted and blocked on sight, as Supersayien312 says. Has his account been included in the sock-puppet investigation?


First of all i live in eastern Tuscany but i'm writing from north Umbria that is Perugia district and so a different region.Second i talked to Robert several times and he wrote to me as you can see on my talk page.I talked also to others about it. So here nobody is respecting me just because 64... vandalized my profile and he is even free to act even now!I'm bored,this isn't a civil behaviour towards an invalid person.Really bored.14:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Gladio4772 (talk)