This is an archive of past discussions with User:Superastig. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello! can you request that you upload a Title Card of Walang Hanggang Paalam? because the show starts tomorrow so we need to put a Title Card, thank you friend. Jangmi20 (talk) 05:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much friend! It's ok, I uploaded the New version again, I just took it from Logopedia but Thank you again. :) Jangmi20 (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
by the way my friend! Can you also change the Season 8's Title Card of Ang Probinsyano? Because their 5th anniversary is tomorrow. sorry my friend I just remembered and told you. but Thanks :) Jangmi20 (talk) 10:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not change the Season 8 Title Card my friend! because I also tried to upload the Title Card, but my upload is ok hahaha :) Jangmi20 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DXYZ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zamboanga.
I want to start working on a new article for this musical artist. I discovered him via my Filipino partner, who watched the Miss Universe Philippines and we love his song. I found out he was on Tawag_ng_Tanghalan_(season_2). What do you think? Bearian (talk) 18:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Bearian, here are the sources I can find about him:
[1], [2] and [3] partially talk about his stint on TNT Season 2.
[4] and [5] talk about his career after TNT, especially being part of the band.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:SparrowUnit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nielsen Pearson Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969TT me16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NielsenPearson1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nielsen/Pearson (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End-Time Mission Broadcasting Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Empire ASTalk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2026. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2026. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for uploading File:NielsenPearson1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Just fix all the Errors on The Page of Ang Probinsyano, because I can't edit first because of my Online Class so I just leave it to you to Edit all the Pages of Ang Probinsyano here on Wikipedia, and thank you very much friend. Gardo Versace 2 (talk) 08:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Gardo Versace 2, I'm alright. I've been busy cleaning up articles related to PH radio for the past few months and I occasionally visit articles of various TV shows to do some clean-up. Ang Probinsyano has been taken care of admins like ChompyAce whenever they spot any disruptive edits. BTW, what happened to your other account? ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)01:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Kearl Lago, although I usually don't meddle with the schedule, I believe it's NOT necessary to indicate the broadcast schedule of every station, whether it's still in pandemic or not. That's why I removed the schedule. Please read WP:NOTDIR first. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)13:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bandera News Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catarman.
Thanks for uploading File:HotshotsMovie.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
I also can't Clean-Up the Page because there is a lot of Suckpuppetry on the Page. so to the Expert Editors I am asking for help to just Clean-up all the Information on all The Page of Ang Probinsyano etc. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
but if you can't do what I'm asking you to do, just have the Editors you know do it as long as all the information is in order. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
and there are also names on the Cast and Characters and Guest Stars that are not really part of the show. so I hope you can Clean Up. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Billy Argenta, I see no problem with the guest stars page. While it is true that there are cast members there that were not given on screen credits, nonetheless, other outlets have credited them as appearing on the show and the citation thereto is attached. So that isn't problematic as you make it out to be. Gardo Versace (talk) 08:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the reminder, but can you please Clean-Up all the Information as the Editor used to do on the Ang Probinsyano Page? like always updated. Billy Argenta (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I take it that you won't have a problem explaining yourself to the administrators by still posting references from that Yera Calma of Twitter (which is not a verified account and reliable), after you've been not told to. These are recent edits after you've been warned.[8][9][10]
Hotwiki, I barely meddle with articles on series. I only inserted citation templates instead of the links from Yera Calma in the main article. There's honestly nothing wrong with that. I know there must be sources about the ratings of every episode, but they are barely found anywhere than Twitter. Posting the ratings of every episode is no big deal at all, regardless of the sources. But, if you wanna have it your way, then fine! You win. You the man. You a better editor than me. You happy?ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)12:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
You reverted the deleted unreferenced edits. Simple as that. You don't need to restore it when you didn't have a reference to back up the information to begin with. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites (and a film database book), promo material, a blog review, and videos. Fails WP:NFILM
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please soft block this user User:136.158.32.175 for making disruptive edits and not following how the main page of a series works like it’s supposed to be cast and characters but puts only cast instead. Hopefully you can find a way to do it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.226.215 (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
136.158.32.175, thanks for informing me regarding the IP users. They've been making disruptive edits in the articles of 2 of the TV series, in which I had them semi-protected. Unfortunately, I'm not an admin to take action on the IP users. It's best if you report them to WayKurat. I believe he knows what to do with the IP users you mentioned. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)14:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
SmokeyJoe, the participants who voted to redirect the draft to article space are spot on with their arguments. If there's anything in the draft that any editor wants to include to the article, then its history is preserved. Besides, drafts are usually moved to article space once accepted and therefore serve as a redirect to the latter. Therefore, a redirect will be a valid alternative whatsoever. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)08:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
SportingFlyer, no can do. I did not vote in the discussion as I barely meddle with American stations. I close the consensus based on how strong the arguments are. The argument of one "keep" is spot on and the two "keep" votes seem to agree with the former. Therefore, the "keep" arguments are stronger and do have merit whatsoever. So, you have no choice but to drop the stick and accept the consensus. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)12:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Sorry about this. I had an EC and sometimes they will correct themselves. I went back to add a replyto template and then when I came back it resolved itself. Apparently I overrode your post instead. :S Sorry! - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi. There are a couple of deletion discussions where I voted to redirect the articles to their networks as an ATD, but they ended up getting deleted instead. Do I have to take them to the DelRev to change the closer's mind? SBKSPP (talk) 01:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
SBKSPP, no need to take it to the DRV. It will be a bit of a hassle, you have to wait for a week for the decision. Just be bold to create a new redirect to the desired target. It's that simple. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)15:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
As an FM radio format, will Star FM's provincial stations of Bombo Radyo Philippines still carried a mass-based format despite being uses "It's All For You", which started to carrying the new slogan since the 1st quarter of 2016? Because I wanted to calling from Star FM Iloilo (Bombo Radyo's flagship FM station) on my cellphone 2 years ago that regional Star FM stations had switched to an Love Songs and Top 40 format (and some old stuff), and using English and Filipino as it's medium. Unlike Star FM Manila that uses "Like Mo, Share Mo" (since 2014) and still carried a mass-based format, which played OPM and foreign songs whether old and new, similar to other mass-based stations like 90.7 Love Radio, 101.1 Yes The Best, 91.5 Win Radio, 93.9 iFM and 106.7 Energy FM. However, all Star FM stations nationwide played some old stuff to it's regular playlist.
Boombastic061, every mass-based station plays a mix of Love Songs and Top 40 and old music. There were no changes on their playlist when Star FM's provincial stations started using "It's All For You". I've listened to Star FM Davao during my visit to the city back in 2019 and it's just like Star FM Manila. Therefore, even if you whine all day long, regardless of slogan or a mix of language they're using, ALL Star FM stations still carry a mass-based format. So, be it. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)01:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ang Dalawang Ikaw episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bungle I disagree. The policy is crystal clear. "If the nomination has received very few or no comments but appears controversial to the closing administrator, or has been declined for proposed deletion in the past, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement." This is followed by four possible outcomes, including soft deletion. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
I personally think it's a controversial close for a non-admin to make, but given three others disagree I will acquiesce.4meter4 (talk) 03:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
IP Sockpuppets
Hello. I would like to report these IP Sockpuppets that are unhelpful and suspicious. These IPs needs to blocked, or, you can investigate them, keep in mind and watching over them.
I suspect that there's going to have more new sockpuppets connected to all the IPs that I mentioned above (as per WP:SHARE rule), and I hope someone would take actions against them. -136.158.42.180 (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for informing me. It's best if you report those IP users and their disruptive edits at WP:AIV and request the pages you mentioned for semi-protection from unregistered users for months at WP:RFPP. I believe the admins can help you there. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)11:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hotwiki, I actually did add some of them. And I intend to add more. Yet, you failed to see them. It took me a lot of time to dig deeper to the Pilot's episode. You weren't like this with Heartful Café. Don't be insensitive with my edits. 🙂 ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)06:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
I looked what I deleted from your edits, and you only added those "Facebook links" as your source when you were warned twice today. Also it isn't anyone's job to look for references when you post unreferenced material in Wikipedia.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hotwiki, then you shouldn't have reverted my edits with the initial sources in the first place. I could've easily picked up where I left. It's not as easy as you think since it took me a lot of time to dig much deeper in the Facebook page to reach the link of the Pilot episode. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)15:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Again, I didn't remove any edits of yours that had a reference. I removed edits of yours that were unreferenced. You wouldn't even have added a reference to episode titles, if you weren't told again and again to add a reference. If you managed to find episode titles and post it in Wikipedia, it shouldn't be that hard to add it as a reference in Wikipedia. Wikipedia 101 - don't forget to cite your sources. You have been editing articles for years, without adding a reference. Are you going to add a references to the episode titles of Legal Wives, Nagbabagang Luha, The World Between Us as well they are unreferenced as well? Based on the edit history of the episode lists of those show, you added an unreferenced episode titles. Also you shouldn't make a separate article for episodes when the article of that show isn't even big to begin with. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hotwiki, really? This version you reverted showed sources from the episodes from the last 6 days. Though the sources were indicated beside their respective dates, it's obvious that I wasn't done with that. You seem to be trigger happy with episode lists, especially the ones created by Mc Eduard Figueroa. I see no requirement for episode titles to be referenced. Take a look at List of Little Nanay episodes, List of Alyas Robin Hood episodes, List of Ika-6 na Utos episodes, List of Meant to Be episodes, List of The Blood Sisters episodes and List of Pamilya Ko episodes. They have no references regarding their episode titles, though they came from FB pages of GMA and ABS-CBN, but they have references regarding their ratings from either the respective websites and FB pages of GMA and ABS-CBN or Philippine Entertainment Portal (or LionHearTV in some occasions). I honestly see nothing wrong with creating a separate article for episodes as long as they have no fixed number of episodes. Everyone has the right to create one. So, be it. I will not waste my time talking about it from hereon.
Also, I feel insulted when you told me that I have been editing articles for years without adding a reference. For my years of existence in Wikipedia, I know how to add sources. I'm not that stupid. I have created and edited several articles from music to radio to film and all of them are well sourced (setting aside episode lists), including some of the articles which survived the AfD. I make sure that I have enough sources to create every article and I document every article I created in my page. So, don't be judgmental with my contributions. I am telling the truth no matter what. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)02:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Koikefan, since it's been a week since he closed that discussion, it's too late to convince him to revert his closure on that discussion. The only way to sort things out is to take it to the WP:DELREV. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)02:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bestman: 4 Better, Not 4 Worse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
SBKSPP, we use WP:G6 to move the content rather than the manual cut-and-paste procedure, which isn't tolerated. Thanks for the request, but I feel that this is not the right time to do that since there's no copy of the latest NTC listing yet. The previous listing listed the frequency under PA and I'm not sure if the mentioned call letter is in the recent listing. I heard an aircheck about it on YouTube, but it's not enough to be considered reliable. I'll get back to it once a copy of the recent listing is available. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)14:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft lacks a Reception section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Superastig!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Explicit, thanks for the notice. I also read the posts you indicated and what he's doing isn't tolerable. He even closed a few discussions where he was involved, including this, where he attempted to close it even if it hadn't reached 168 hours. I even reminded him about WP:NACINV. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)12:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username ThadeusOfNazereth, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, DYKZ, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYKZ.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ThadeusOfNazereth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ThadeusOfNazereth, thanks for bringing this up. I created the article you mentioned, along with the 2 others in the discussion, as redirects to their respective owners since I barely found anything about them. Certain IP users created the content unsourced days ago and I wasn't aware of that. I'll participate in the discussion ASAP. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)10:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Superastig, I see you closed the Let's Go Brandon AfD discussion, but I am concerned that it has been too controversial for a NAC close, per WP:NACD, and that it may be better to permit an administrator to close it. In the related WP:NAC essay, in the pitfalls to avoid section, it states, Controversial topics may be indicated by the broad topic area, related discussions, and previous XfDs (if applicable). With the understanding that the closure may be reversed, non-admins should generally avoid closing such discussions, especially if the non-admin is relatively new to the relevant process or topic area. There are several previous and related XfDs, as well as RfCs, so beyond the broad topic area and the tenor of the some of the discussion indicating the controversial nature, this AfD also seems controversial due to the amount of related past and pending discussions. Would you be willing to reverse your NAC close to allow an administrator to review this AfD, due to the controversial nature of this AfD? Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm afraid I cannot. It's clear that the "keep" votes have more weight than the "delete" and "merge/redirect" votes and the discarded ones. Despite how controversial the discussion is, the closure was well-thought, it took me a few hours prior to make a decision. So, it's best for you to drop the stick and accept the consensus. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)16:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Banana Republic, thanks. It took me some time to think of an appropriate closing statement, based on the statements by the "keep" voters and my past experiences on AfDs. Perhaps, I missed out on rule #2 of WP:NACD while reading it. No matter how controversial it is, the result is obvious and the "keep" votes mentioned WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT. So, I thought I'd give it a shot on closing it. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)16:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Banana Republic, thanks for clarifying. The nominator is just wasting his time with the DelRev. As if it's a sin for any non-admin like me to close the discussion when, in fact, the result is obvious. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)23:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I drop by to say that you've done a very bold move in closing the Let's Go Brandon discussion. It's damn controversial, but there are a ton of people who voted keep - including me. I searched the meme and it has lotsa coverage. SBKSPP (talk) 01:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
SBKSPP, indeed it is. It took me some time to think of an appropriate closing statement. I know it's controversial, but the result is obvious. So, I thought I'd give it a shot on closing it. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)16:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
There's really nothing wrong with your closure on the discussion. I can't believe the nom was so butthurt, he wanted you to revert your closure 'coz you're no admin. C'mon, man. Wikipedia is WP:NOTBURO. It's a clear keep whether the closer is an admin or not. This was the 2nd, 3rd time this happened to you, right? SBKSPP (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
SBKSPP, the 4th time. The first time was a draft. The rest are articles. The last time this happened was when I closed a discussion as no consensus. Yet, almost 12 hours after the closure, an editor threw hissy fits over my closure and forced me to reopen it so he would participate. I initially refused to appeal since all my closures done in every discussion is final. But he kept insisting until I waved the white flag after he threatened me to take it to the DelRev otherwise. He even insisted that I didn't do a very good job in giving proper weight to the given arguments when in fact I really did.
As for the recent discussion, the nominator's hissy fit was unexpected. Though I sort of missed out on rule #2 of WP:NACD while reading it, someone clarified that I didn't violate it. Anyway, now that my closure is heavily endorsed, faith in humanity has been restored. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)07:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
@Superastig: ah yes. I remember that convo. He's such a crybaby for forcing you to repoen it. He acted like a kid crying after he wasn't given his candy. Lol. If only he was brave enough to take it to the DRV, I would've endorsed your closure. You really did a good job in closing it. It's pointless for you to revert you closure in favor of him. My redirect !vote has merits and so did the keep !vote. SBKSPP (talk) 01:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
SBKSPP, true. The "keep" vote is weaker than the "redirect" vote since the voter only mentioned nothing else but AllMusic. But, whether it is rebutted or not, it is still valid like the "redirect" argument no matter what. I did what I could to make the closure fair and square. Had he tagged other editors to participate on the discussion at an earlier time prior to the closure, I would've closed it as "redirect". Therefore, it's his fault and not mine, since he refused to drop the stick and accept the consensus. ASTIG😎(ICE T • ICE CUBE)17:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
@Superastig: That's right. Had they shut up and accept the consensus, then those kinds of problems wouldn't have gone worse. On the other hand, it's good the DRV re: Brandon has favored your closure. It's pointless to take it to the DRV when the result is a clear keep. What matters is that they're over. SBKSPP (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Stories from the Heart
Hi @Superastig: Can you stop adding these really dodgy, low-quality unreliable references or I will need to start posting warning notices and asking for RPP. They are rank. Please do not add them back in. scope_creepTalk12:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Then take the sections out until another source is available. The source is coming up as red on the AFC/NPP script as unreliable as in non-RS. It is not done to post a whole of list of junk reference. scope_creepTalk14:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
@Superastig: I would suggest moving the section to the talk page and waiting until something turns up. I've went through several instances of this myself, one the General der Nachrichtenaufklärung article that I was writing at the time. Looking at the talk page, you can see a list of name. I waited four years for references to turn up for some of these. I'm still waiting for two of them at the moment. I'd completely forgotten about the article itself and it was mentioned by somebody and there was the refs. I think taking the long view is a rational way of doing it. It seems to be the approach that everything is going to here anyway. I hope that helps a wee bit. scope_creepTalk15:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Closeup.jpg){kind=link}
_Closeup.jpg){kind=link}