User talk:SuperSharanya

Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar Budget

I have reverted your changes on the Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar budget as Ranbir Kapoor, reportedly, did not charge his fees. Additionally, any references on Bhushan Kumar stating the budget is 200 crore are unreliable as he was talking about the previously shelved Ranbir Kapoor and Ajay Devgn movie. Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 12:10, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 Please provide reliable sources for your claim. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have done so now. Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 It is unreliable as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Please understand it. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey in the budget you kept it as 175-200 crores i am removing it and keeping it at 175 crores because the report basing it at 200 crore which is based on Bhushan Kumar which is not true Repto79456 (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Repto79456: Financial Express doesn't says that this statement (₹200 crore) is from Bhushan Kumar. Then how can you tell this ₹200 crore budget is from Bhushan? SuperSharanya (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Financial Express published that article just after when Bhushan Kumar's statement video went viral which signifies that article rely on his statement that the budget is 200cr. Greatly influenced (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not only Pinkvilla, Financial Express is also reliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. People come to Wikipedia for right information, then we must provide it reliability. That is why I'm for right information. I've discussed in his talk page many times and User:Ravensfire also discussed. But he is not hearing anything and just simply removing the budget. Is it correct? You must also provide right information. Thanks. SuperSharanya (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperSharanya, there's a discussion on the article talk page on this. You need to discuss it there and wait for a consensus to develop. When reliable sources differ on something like this, the usual approach is to use a range and actually cover the reasons for the range (backed by those reliable sources...) in the body of the article. Yes, sources can be biased. So can film producers who really, REALLY want the world to know their film was successful. Just, you know, ignore the creative accounting film studios are notorious for... Ravensfire (talk) 22:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion in talk page. But nobody is discussing anything there. Other editors are simply coming and removing the budget. When I revert their edit, they will come for edit warring. That's the problem. Now the budget is correct. Please add budget if anyone removed it. Thanks. SuperSharanya (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kabzaa (2023 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagol0929 I've provided reliable source. You check it clearly. Thanks. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that i made an oopsie Nagol0929 (talk) 12:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagol0929 It's ok. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]