User talk:Stu Segal

License tagging for File:SteveNeil 85weirdest.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SteveNeil 85weirdest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stephen H. Segal

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stephen H. Segal, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen H. Segal. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concerns over the deletion nomination. Please understand that articles are NOT deleted because of all of the reasons you seem to think they are. The primary reason an article is deleted is that the subject of the article does not meet the inclusion criteria as spelled out in the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines and on the sub-guidelines linked from there. These are a set of objective criteria which must be established before the subject of a stand-alone article must demonstrate before the article is deemed to be worthy of inclusion. The idea that an article contains facts instead of opinions does not enter into the decision to delete an article from Wikipedia. Also, the articles future is determined by a discussion, not a single editor's feelings. Please feel free to contribute to that discussion. I do not harbor a strong desire to see the article deleted, per se. If it can be shown that the subject does meet the inclusion requirements of Wikipedia, or if other editors come to the consensus that deletion is not the best option for this article, I am cool with that as well. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen H Segal - CoI

Stu, hi. Thanks for your message. WP:COI is the official document regarding potential conflicts of interest; the main requirement is that you (a) declare your interest in the subject on the article talk page (which you've done already) - the guideline recommends declaring it on your user page, too - and (b) make sure that any edits you make to the article are unbiassed and adequately sourced. In my opinion, the article as it stands is OK in this respect, so I've removed the COI tag; as long as you keep up the high standards you've shown so far in any future edits, I'm sure there won't be a problem. Tevildo (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SteveNeil 85weirdest.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SteveNeil 85weirdest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:StephenHSegal-segal1.jpg

Notice

The file File:StephenHSegal-segal1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]