User talk:Steve Quinn/Archive 2

Message from interferometrist..

Hi, Is this the proper way to send a message to another editor? (I'm still very new here!). As I mentioned on another talk page, thanks for the references concerning negative refractive index metamaterials, which I will try to look at (certainly before I go and change any of the page content!).

But I wanted to ask another question. I was going to edit a page which I have expert knowledge of, but I realize that material on WP is supposed to have references in the public domain. Unfortunately some technologies are not very well publicized because the corporations that employ them don't like to help their competitors! Is it acceptable to insert as a reference "Notes taken during course lectures by Prof. Planck" for instance? I know it doesn't make sense for people to have to post some material on a website just so they can refer to it as being in the "public domain" rather than just writing it on WP. How strict is the rule about verifiability?

Thanks for your answers in advance! Interferometrist (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you tell me why some of my insertions come out in long lines, like above? Was I not supposed to put in the leading blanks? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Interferometrist (talk • contribs) 16:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MORE: MORE: MORE:

Hi, THANKS for your help about editing and punctuation, and also about referencing material:

Right now I am looking into your question regarding notes that you transcribed from a course or a professor. I am assuming that you want to write your notes into an article on Wikipedia.

Thanks! Yes, I already have uploaded the content, but I do take the matter of verifiability seriously and wanted to do this right. But I had no doubt about the accuracy of what I was writing given that it came from a primary source (the professor was involved in the research cited) and that I understood it well (and would have the expertise to discern whether the information is questionable). Unfortunately, as I was saying before, when you go from science to engineering, there may be little or no academic material available because the companies involved are more interested in protecting what they perceive as trade secrets :-(

There is no problem with that as long as you can support these with reliable secondary and tertiary, sources.

Well I have finally dug up a secondary source which I can equally well cite, and will add that to the article's references. So that should suffice. Though if you do get an answer about using course notes as a source, I'd be interested in the answer!

Here are some guidlnes you can look at WP:RS, WP:PSTS, and WP:SOURCES.

Yes, I've been looking through those, thanks. But it seems there are a lot of such guidelines and I was hoping not to get too involved in the process but just to help add content to WP among topics where I have some expertise and see room for improvement in what's already posted. Much of the care that is requested really has more to do with controversial topics where there may be an actual question of neutrality. Thanks again for all the help!!

Interferometrist (talk) 12:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Dear Steve, Thanks for your concern. I get abuse on my talk page all the time, because I am an admin and delete quite a lot of articles. There are lots of contributors here who get really serious abuse on their talk pages, so I just ignore it. Unfortunately, wikipedia attracts a lot of not-so-bright people along with the intelligent people. :-) Deb (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gil-sung Park

Hello, Steve Quinn. You have new messages at Msrasnw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:The Best American Poetry 1993 book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Best American Poetry 1993 book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations

The article Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]