User talk:Steve-g

This user may have left Wikipedia. Steve-g has not edited Wikipedia since 21 April 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

You queried how long Carson had worked at TWS, and I got 1983-1987 from The End Of Print, as I cited on the page. --81.101.140.42 13:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Nasworthy

I wasn't the guy who wrote that, actually. Some anon came in and wrote a bunch of information that was helpful, but had no source. Thanks for helping out with cleaning up Skateboarding articles. It's possible that I might get a WikiProject:Skateboarding started soon. --Liface 22:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SkateBoarder magazine

I changed the name. For next time just click on "move" on the tabs at the top of the page, which allow you to move the page to a new name. --Liface 16:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skateboard

There isn't really that much vandalism to skateboard. At least not enough to justify protection. And there are a few constructive edits coming from IPs, so it's probably best left open. -- Steel 12:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Mullen

For now, revert him and leave another message asking him to discuss things on the talk page. Reverting back to an old version of his is impolite at best. If he continues to revert with that attitude ("The new changes suck", "Stop bastardizing this article", etc) he'll find himself on the wrong end of a block. I've watchlisted the page and will semi-protect it to force him to log in if necessary. "Influential and enduring" is pretty clear POV unless it has a source, so if push comes to shove there won't be a whole lot of people on his side. -- Steel 20:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't happen to know which particular revision he's reverting back to do you? -- Steel 21:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked for 48 hours and pointed him to WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. -- Steel 12:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IASC page and war against blanks

I made a new article for International Association of Skateboard Companies and included the war it wages on blank skateboards. I would like you to review it and it would be a great oppurtunity to cover a first current event in skateboarding in the best way possible.--KoRnholio8 21:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the atricle's talk page for further discussion.--KoRnholio8 14:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hessian (social group)

Dude, you're a skaterboy.

I removed that article about Hessians because that is an EXTREMELY false representation of us. I deleted it and started trying to form something to give a better representation, but didnt have time for it. I will replace it tonight sometime with something. what it is currently set at is EXTREMELY false, and i find very offensive.

(sorry for originally putting that on your user page: i'd never left comments for anyone before.) I edited the Hessian (social group) last night, its very poor and i wish someone who knew more than I would do it. Still, its a better representation now. i might ask one of the anus.com or hessian.org guys to do it. Cheerio. Isilioth

Thanks a ton.

I just want to say, along with anyone else who wants to, thanks to steve-g for all he has done. I recently began skateboarding and there is a real lack of info. about skateboarders on the internet. Thanks for doing the Rodney page and for helping on many other articles, i really appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ossum (talk • contribs) 22:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RODNEY MULLEN ARTICLE NEEDS UNVANDALISING! I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO!!!!!

THIS IS URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASSE READ!!! RODNEY MULLEN ARTICLE NEEDS UNVANDALISING! I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO!!!!! I CHECKED THE HISTORY PAGES TO TRY AND UNDO THE VANDALISM, BUT IC COULDN'T UNDERSTAND IT!!!!!!!!! PLEASE REVERT IT FOR ME!

Sorry about the caps, but I don't know what to do, please help! Mcjm4796 (talk) 10:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Aaron-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aaron-1.jpg, which you've attributed to Bart Jones. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Aaron-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aaron-2.jpg, which you've attributed to Bart Jones. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Steve-g from fellow WikiProject Skateboarding member!

A sick Harold Hunter wallride for you! I'm Wil540 and I am a member of WikiProject_Skateboarding like you and I also run an independent digital history project focused on skateboarding called the Skateboarding Digital History Project. Unfortunately, the Rick McCrank article has been nominated for deletion. Please contribute if you feel opinionated on the nomination: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rick_McCrank_(2nd_nomination) --Wil540 art (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]