User talk:SocDoneLeft

Welcome!

Hi SocDoneLeft! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mae Louise Miller has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mae Louise Miller. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SocDoneLeft. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Mae Louise Miller, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mae Louise Miller has been accepted

Mae Louise Miller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Thank you very much! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your first article

Thanks, SocDoneLeft, for creating your first article. If you intend to write more biographies of women, you might be interested in joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. In any case, if ever you need any assistance, feel free to let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Face Reality Political Prisoners Freedom Now.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Face Reality Political Prisoners Freedom Now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Yidisher Kultur-Farband. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Shouldn't this be split into two articles with Farband being a disambiguation?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: Thanks for the note, but I didn't create this page -- I'm glad they were split, no idea why they were joined. SocDoneLeft (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about North Star Network

Hello, SocDoneLeft

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AngusWOOF and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect North Star Network, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 14 § North Star Network.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: Replied! SocDoneLeft (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Socialist Equality Party election results

The article List of Socialist Equality Party election results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

These results have not received significant attention from reliable independent sources, which is hardly surprising as they didn't result in any wins or even came close.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Socialist Equality Party election results for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Socialist Equality Party election results is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Socialist Equality Party election results until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Action (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Land Reform Movement (China), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fairbank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Cliffite. User:Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 00:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to pester

Could you please use summaries on everything at the Mike Johnson article? Its history has become a complete disaster over the last few hours so the fewer unexplained edits, the better. City of Silver 19:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@City of Silver: Yes, my bad SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

} Hello SocDoneLeft, at Mike Johnson, you added Daily Kos as a source. Per WP:RSP, Daily Kos should generally be avoided as a source, especially for controversial political topics where better sources are available. Please use sources highlighted in green in WP:RSP instead. starship.paint (RUN) 06:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Morenoism

Hello, SocDoneLeft

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Morenoism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Morenoism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Social-Democratic Workingmen's Party of North America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social-Democratic Workingmen's Party of North America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social-Democratic Workingmen's Party of North America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 04:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to refuse to answer this question, since I'm not very clear on the policy on this, but are you the same SocDoneLeft as on Twitter, etc.? The username policy states that usernames referencing real-life celebrities are definitely not allowed unless the identity is verified, but I'm not sure on the policy for online personalities. Fermiboson (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on National Labor Federation

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Labor Federation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Progressive Victory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progressive Victory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Victory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI

Hi SocDoneLeft, I saw your edit to Keffals, and I'm going to give you a nudge that an edit like that would warrant an inclusion in the edit summary saying "(possible COI)" to adhere to our COI guidelines. From what I understand, you are friends with Vaush and Keffals, correct? I'm not saying you can't edit their pages—what you edited was perfectly fine. :) SWinxy (talk) 06:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SWinxy: Fair -- that's my bad, should've noted possible COI! Will do so in future (though I don't plan to edit their page much). SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Progressive Victory logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Progressive Victory logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SocDoneLeft! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on List of third-party and independent performances in United States state legislative elections. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very well researched, congrats!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 13:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- but I only moved the page, I didn't do the work! SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Entryism

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Entryism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Johannes Maximilian: Thank you for taking the time to review this article!

I agree that the article would be better if it had more reliable sources. However, I believe that ALL of the key claims in the article are supported by reliable sources, summarized below:

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Cleveland Scene (1)	independent newspaper	Cleveland Scene is a news organization	full article discusses Maupin's past in the Workers World Party (WWP) and its youth wing, Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST)	✔ Yes
CPUSA (2)	~ CPUSA is a rival socialist organization	~ CPUSA is a rival socialist organization; however, most of its descriptions of Maupin in this article are factual with accompanying quotes, rather than ideological/opinion descriptions	article discusses Maupin's non-affiliation with CPUSA, collaboration with national Bolsheviks and other far-right figures, and organizational history in detail	~ Partial
The Nation (5)	independent newspaper	The Nation is a WP:NEWSORG	only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center	✘ No
The Guardian (6)	independent newspaper	The Guardian is a WP:NEWSORG	only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center	✘ No
CNN (7)	independent newspaper	CNN is a WP:NEWSORG	only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center	✘ No
Kyiv Post (8)	independent newspaper	~ opinion piece, though by writer focused on this topic area	article discusses Maupin, CPI, and its relationship to Tara Reade for half a dozen paragraphs	~ Partial
The Insider (11)	independent newspaper	The Insider (website) is a WP:NEWSORG	entire article is about Maupin, including CPI history, sexual abuse allegations, and relationship with Russian media	✔ Yes
Business Insider (14)	independent newspaper	Business Insider is a WP:NEWSORG	~ includes four paragraphs about Maupin's (key) role in getting American left-ish-ists to lend legitimacy to Nicaraguan government via election observation	~ Partial
Newsweek (15)	independent newspaper	Newsweek is a WP:NEWSORG	~ entire article is about an event by Maupin and CPI and their ideology/actions; however, article mostly repeats quotes and social media	~ Partial
Newsweek (16)	independent newspaper	Newsweek is a WP:NEWSORG	a list includes Maupin's name	✘ No
TruthOrFiction.com (18)	independent newspaper	TruthOrFiction.com is a WP:NEWSORG	~ entire article is about an event by Maupin and CPI and their ideology/actions; however, article mostly repeats quotes and social media	~ Partial
Polygraph.info (22)	independent newspaper	~ Polygraph.info is a US government news source; given that Maupin works for US geopolitical opponents, VOA may be unreliable	most of article is about Maupin and CPI; remainder is about the Rage Against the War Machine event that they helped organize	~ Partial
WUSA9 (25)	independent newspaper	WUSA9 is a WP:NEWSORG	~ although video does not mention Maupin, it discusses RAWM event held by Maupin and CPI	~ Partial
The Week (26)	independent newspaper	The Week is a WP:NEWSORG	~ although article does not mention Maupin, it discusses RAWM event held by Maupin and CPI	~ Partial
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Would you look favorably on creating this article and removing whatever claims do not have reliable sources backing them up? SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mate, unfortunately, there is just way too much wrong with the sourcing in that draft. Footnotes 4, 9, 12, 13, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 33 refer to sources that are outright unreliable. They need replacing, and it doesn't matter that some other sources might be fine. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Johannes Maximilian: Thank you for your reply!

I removed all of those sources (except 20 and 21, since they're CPIUSA announcements about itself) and the article was mostly unchanged. Do you have any other recommendations? SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revolutionary Communists of America

The article Revolutionary Communists of America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable, no independent sources for either "Revolutionary Communists of America" or previous name of "Socialist Revolution"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wellington Bay (talk) 12:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revolutionary Communists of America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolutionary Communists of America, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Communists of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on International Peoples' Assembly. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 10:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Party USA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Communist Party USA election results, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 21:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Freedom Road Socialist Organization

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Freedom Road Socialist Organization, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

are you the youtuber

idk tho i might be confused ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 21:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"BreakThrough News" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect BreakThrough News has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 28 § BreakThrough News until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 07:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samoht27 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Samoht27: Thank you for your review! The deleted article was massively different from this article. For example, take WP:RS: That article had just 1 (Vice.com).

This draft has 7 WP:RS ([2] The Guardian, [3] The Free Press, [4] The Jewish Chronicle, [9] The New York Times, [10] Independent Political Report, [18] Vermont Sec of State, and [19] La Repubblica). This draft also has 11 WP:ABOUTSELF sources ([1] ACP Ledger, [5] CPUSA 32nd Convention, [6] ACP Declaration, [7] Hinkle tweet, [8] Garrido article, [11] CPUSA Solidnet message pt1, [12] CPUSA chapter tweets, [13] CPUSA Solidnet message pt2, [14] WAP declaration, [15] ACP Constitution, and [16] ACP Program).

In addition, each WP:ABOUTSELF source supports no claim that is substantial or self-serving beyond "ACP holds position X" or "CPUSA holds position Y". This is common in articles on smaller political organizations for summarizing their programs (for example). In this article, all claims which go beyond "ACP says X" are supported by a WP:RS.

If you have time, I would appreciate another review! SocDoneLeft (talk) 00:12, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:American Communist Party has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:American Communist Party. Thanks! Tesleemah (talk) 08:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 07:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on List of Communist Party USA election results. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! May you have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America

Hello, SocDoneLeft. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PSL

The source I added regarding the PSL's views on the persecution of Uyghurs said referred to the persecution as a myth. This quote was from that article:

"The so-called forced labor rhetoric is unfounded. So is the overall myth that undergirds it, namely that the Chinese government as a part of a “war on Islam” has incarcerated upward of 1 million Uyghurs and ethnic minorities as part of a genocide." Also in this article it says: "The widely published reports of Zenz, the China whisperer for Western imperialism, are also behind the claims of genocide and mass incarceration. " How does this count as original research? JPHC2003 (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JPHC2003: The PSL article is highly contested. Everything without a secondary source (WP:RS) will end up removed eventually. Find one and feel free to add. SocDoneLeft (talk) 06:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]