User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2014/October

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Smsarmad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Salvaged some of your content

I salvaged some of your contributions (and mine) from the redirected WP:Sockophobia article after reviewing that MFD as it stated the article could be recreated or something if there's some value in it. There might not be much need of a redundant essay on it but why waste useful advice. So I moved the content to WP:DBQ so that other editors there can refine it. Informing if you were interested in refining it further as all the controversy that was there is not in context now (and I only copied the non controversial parts). --lTopGunl (talk) 20:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)