This is an archive of past discussions with User:Smsarmad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
[You commented on my talk page and I accept your request]
Please,
I guess you know that good indentation makes prolonged discussions easier to read and understand. Yes, it is not necessarily written in chronological order. But my request is that since you're involved in a discussion with multiple editors in that thread it, IMO at least, please try to comment below others' replies and don't disregard (or inadvertently overturn) the current course/progress of the discussion, unless of course you genuinely think it's important for the betterment of Wikipedia or feel otherwise.
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a derogatory conclusion that is not explicitly stated by any of the sources. (See WP:SYNTH.)
And I humbly request you not to make soup at that talk page. About synthesis, are those sources that I have given on the talkpage present in the article? Those sources were added after an editor raised a particular concern. About derogatory conclusion, that is your POV. Reliable sources state that a country provided military training, arms, ammunition, drugs to a militant organization and I have stated that without any conclusion, because that thing itself is so obvious that it doesn't need to be concluded. --SMSTalk09:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
"Reliable sources" - Sources —Plural? and —Reliable? [Chuckling]
I again suggest you read the arguments in the talk of the article. I will leave your talk page and I don't wish to come back (removed it from my watchlist). Thank you.
P.S. If you want to talk with me about something other than the discussions we are having elsewhere, come to my talk page and we can take it from there. Mrt3366(Talk?)09:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes reliable sources, and I request you not to judge anything on your liking. Anyway thanks for de-watchlisting this page. --SMSTalk09:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agha Waqar's Water Fuelled Car until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
(talk page stalker) Looks like he doesn't want to answer. It is not compulsory to reveal all accounts or even that one has them since some times the purpose of having the alternate account would be void by revealing that... just saving you some time (if that is the case). --lTopGunl (talk)21:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Have you even looked at my edit which you reverted? I admire your skill of reverting with eyes closed but that is not what we are here for, we always need to careful while reverting any other editor's edit. I hope you will revert your reversion of my edit yourself and will be careful in future. --SMSTalk02:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in multiple edit wars. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Well done! you are learning the use of twinkle too fast, I appreciate it. Feel free to drop more warnings on my userpage. Happy templating, baiting and gaming the system! --SMSTalk02:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I am not adding it as a source if you have cared to look at it. I have only added it as an external link where it provides some useful information, which is allowed per WP:ELMAYBE. And your argument about this being WP:ELNO is totally vague as it is not a blog, personal web page nor fansite, so kindly revert your reversion of my edits. --SMSTalk02:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
If you actually read WP:ELNO it says the following.
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid: #2 Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting.- #2 WP:ELNO
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid: #11 Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority - #11 WP:ELNO
You are very well aware that pakdef.info is unreliable self published source that misleads using factually incorrect information and yet you fail to WP:HEAR, any further attempts to edit war it back will be seen as disruptive editing, cheers --DBigXray07:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Highlighting your favorite part of the sentence won't do it for you, read the complete sentence without any prejudice/bias. --SMSTalk08:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Your Credo Reference account is approved
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
