User talk:Slightsmile/Alternate Talk Page

Please sign and date your entry by typing ~~~~ at the end of your message.
To start a new heading click here.

MANNA

I saw that the entry needed fixing, but am not familiar with how to edit on Wikipedia. However, I think that some of the information contained in the revision (that you rightly undid) should be included in a section about manna in the Quran? yes? Ushwia (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Ushwia[reply]

Put in what you think is right without the praying or the honorifics. Keep it encyclopaedic. I do find it informative to include a section on Islam's interpretation on biblical topics. It's all good knowledge. All the best. SlightSmile 19:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Höss

Please do some research before you revert again. I would suggest read Kollerstrom's book Breaking the Spell. Look at David Cole's (a great Jew who is not afraid of threats against his life) research on Aushwitz. He actually visits the site and asks questions. He is not an armchair editor like others. The statements I edited were edited out correctly as they have already been proven wrong. And no I am not an "anti semite". I just do research properly... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.199.67 (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Wikipedia's place to challenge what the history books say. For what it's worth check out the article here about Nicholas Kollerstrom - we could argue how much of a reliable source he is - hey maybe he is. I don't know who David Cole is and I'm not going to start researching Auschwitz anymore than I'm going research Manna in the Quran (see the thread above). Take your issue to the Rudolf Höss talk page but you must know to not expect much. You obviously read up on the holocaust so you know people don't want to revisit that terrible time in history and reassess who did and didn't do what. SlightSmile 19:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]