Hello, Richard a slade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Shortmead House. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Thanks for uploading File:Lin Homer 1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf.βΌ12:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sladedesign/sandbox/sladedesign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Sladedesign,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Sladedesign/sandbox/sladedesign, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.
If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sladedesign, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to St Neots have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. β DiannaaΒ πΒ (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Life Squared, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...discospinstertalk14:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Soper RE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Soper RE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
I have never quite understood -- in this situation -- whether Wikipedia automatically tells you if I have replied to you on my page, so I thought this time I would reply here.
As you have seen I have recast the St Neots page quite a lot; there was a lot of stuff on it that would put the casual reader off. There is still some work to do; I think the section order towards the bottom isn't right yet, and some of the information still needs refining.
As you have seen, my drone-owning contact has done some good work. I am hoping he will do a panorama of St Neots, like the one for Eaton Socon. (I would like to get the panorama at Eaton Socon right at the top of the page, but I fear that some people would object to the infobox being moved down.) I hate infoboxes; they are visually unappealing. Do we really need to know that the Police area is Cambridgeshire?
Nope alas no automatic notification but this works here. Agreed there was lots of unnecessary and irrelevant information about the town so great to see it cut. If you need another drone/land photographer I can recommend my friend, and local St Neots guy Maciek Platek. If you need any other contacts let me know.
Just for reference, the local history section in Huntingdon library is also very good and if you need any historical stuff about the Eatons they will be held at the Bedfordshire records offices and libraries. Richard Slade 09:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Richard. Maciek was the second kind drone owner to reply. Please especially thank him for me, for his kind offer. I had a conference (well, a chat) with the first volunteer earlier today and he is going to some more. The articles are all ratehr picture-heavy now; I must get back to writing text. There is still a heck of a lot to do, and the History page is already biugger than "recommended". Still to do sanitation, education, street lighting, gas and elec. Not to mention correcting my typos. Then there is cross-checking against Gorham (groan) and the Escon pamphlets and the SN Local Hist Soc stuff. Then there is the Norris collection of old photos at St Ives (but a lot covering St Neots), the Museum collection ("You can come in on a Tuesday and look at the thumbnails in the computer, but we haven't got digital copies.")
My home network is down at the moment and I am writing this now with the benefit of some cabling until that gets sorted out; it means that I can't really do very much today (or yesterday), and in fact all I am doing now apart from replying to you is uploading pics I took myself the other day. WHich then reminded me that I have started a section on the Workhouse Eaton Ford, that says "To be written". If I had done that on a railway article it would have been deleted by now. Afterbrunel (talk) 14:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Richard, I wonder if you could do something to help with this. I'd like to get AUTHORITATIVE population figures. St N, Eynesbury, Eaton Socon, Eaton Ford separately. Is that something you could work on? It's on the internet somewhere. Don't forget the boundary change when Eaton F and S joined St Neots; and the UDC change when Eynesbury Hardwicke split and the urban part of Eynesbury joined St Neots UDC and the Hardwicke bit stayed out; ditto Abbotsley.
Mostly population data coincides with census years, and there is a porediction of the 2021 figure somewhere; maybe they have alrady done the computer run and it's an actual, not a preduiction.
We don't need every census year, just pre-war (say) and then 1951 and if possible every ten years.
I must empasise all of this needs to be able to be cited, back to authoritative information (so not for example a booklet issued by the Town Council unless it says "Figures derived from XYZ")
I also emphasise that this is a tall order, and if you don't fancy it, then there are no hard feelings (but please let me know!). Afterbrunel (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Nigel, I can take a look to see what I can find, although the Cambridgeshire Insight is generally the best place within this county to get that type of data. Leave it with me and I'll dig. Richard Slade 16:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleβthat is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Winsome Douglas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Winsome Douglas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Sladedesign. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Winsome Douglas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Interestingly before I got to finish or publish the article another Wikipedia user created a new article. Not sure if this is a regular behaviour? 51.219.13.233 (talk) 08:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to The Astor theatre. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astor Theatre, Deal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
