User talk:Skyline12399

Notice of rules for Syria war map

Rules for Editing the Map

1- A reliable source for that specific edit should be provided.
a) A well-known source that has a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) for all edits.
b) A well-known source that does not have a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) only for edits that are unfavorable to the side it prefers (favorable to the side it opposes).
c) A source that is not well-known (or that has proven inaccurate for all edits) cannot be used (is deemed unreliable) for any edit. This includes all maps (see item 2- next).

2- Copying from maps is strictly prohibited. Maps from mainstream media are approximate and therefore unreliable for any edit. Maps from amateur sources are below the standards of Wikipedia for any edit. They violate WP:RS and WP:CIRCULAR.
WP:RS: “Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources.” Source: Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources
WP:CIRCULAR: “Do not use websites that mirror Wikipedia content or publications that rely on material from Wikipedia as sources.”

3- WP:POV pushing and intentional misinterpretation of sources will not be tolerated. If you are not sure about what the source is saying (or its reliability), post it on the talk page first so that it would be discussed.

Notice of sanctions

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Tradedia^talk 17:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jalablus

450 troops and 30 tanks does not mean controle. Presence does not equal controle. Hezbollah officially has thousands of troops fighting for regime. Do you see a separate color for Hezbollah? Undo your own edit buddy. Mozad655 (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jalablus

450 troops and 30 tanks does not mean controle. Presence does not equal controle. Hezbollah officially has thousands of troops fighting for regime. Do you see a separate color for Hezbollah? Undo your own edit buddy. You made two reverts minutes apart. You will be banned. Read first rule on top of edit page. Mozad655 (talk) 16:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Turkısh Army vs Hezbollah ? :) Look http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/korgeneral-zekai-aksakalli-cerablusta-40207781 Turkısh Special Force commeder in jarablus.[reply]

I don't speak turkish and don't know what the link you posted on my page says or if its neutral. I'm just saying that if you think it is then you should've added it when you edited. Never edit without adding a reliable source. Otherwise people will change it back very quickly. Mozad655 (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.You have the right parts. Let we be more careful.

August 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please review WP:GS/SCW&ISIL#1RR for the guidelines on the General Sanctions in place for this map. -- Dane2007 ^talk 23:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for for WP:1RR violation of WP:GS/SCW @ Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^talk to me 00:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

revert

you have made two reverts,if you don't revert i will report you to an admin.Alhanuty (talk) 19:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Sakultah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.  — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]