User talk:Siredejoinville

Welcome!

Hello, Siredejoinville, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 07:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan de Borja y Arnau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Europa and Borja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Mariño Family

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Mariño Family without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 22:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan de Borja y Arnau

The article Juan de Borja y Arnau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence Juan de Borja y Arnau existed, and strong reason to believe this is a hoax. see talk and https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consultas_de_borrado/Juan_de_Borja_y_Arnau the AfD on Spanish Wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Juan de Borja y Arnau— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Mariño de Lobeira y Andrade

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antonio Mariño de Lobeira y Andrade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mariño family

If you want to defend it, go here, not to my talk page.--Maragm (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Marquisate of Santa Rosa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marquisate of Santa Rosa, Siredejoinville!

Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good Page! Keep it up!

To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marquisate of Santa Rosa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philip IV and Philip III. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Vicecounty of Casa Romana Chest Arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vicecounty of Casa Romana Chest Arms.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stematta of House of Borja - Borgia.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Stematta of House of Borja - Borgia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 09:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Count of Mayalde

Hello Siredejoinville,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Count of Mayalde for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 15:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Count of Mayalde, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Popular Action Party and Margaret of Austria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Principality of Treano

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Principality of Treano, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Prince of Treano) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Prince of Treano, Siredejoinville!

Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have seen your page and approved it. Thanks Denver 17:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your Good Work! Denver 17:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Sources

You need to start using references... references that sources what is being written in the article. If you don't do this, your additions will be reverted. You've written articles in which 99% of the material were not in the refs given. You've made articles on assumptions.

In addition, you are adding sections that don't make sense or don't have anything in common with the article. I have a feeling English is not your primary language, so some of the problems can be associated with that.

I highly suggest you goto the Teahouse. You can ask questions there and seek help. Somebody should be able to speak Spanish. Bgwhite (talk) 07:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seconding what Bgwhite says. You aren't using reliable sources and in many cases the English appears to be from machine translation. I will revert your edits if the English is terrible or the information unsourced. There is also reason to believe you have a conflict of interest. If you think you are an heir to a title, do not edit that page. Srnec (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sabotage

This and the following edits are pure sabotage: [1]. I and another user spent time fixing it and adding references and you insist on deleting and adding false info. At least you did not mention, as you had originally in that article, that you had rights to this title. I will be reporting you for this and for all the false information and titles that you have been adding in this wikipedia. You think you can get away with it here (would not dare at Spanish wiki where there are people with knowledge about these titles) but this has got to stop. --Maragm (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reported you. See here.--Maragm (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of County of San Juan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article County of San Juan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County of San Juan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bgwhite (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm at wits end. Add only verifiable references that source the material you are adding. Anything else will be reverted. If you continue to revert or add material that is not sourced, you will be blocked. You have been warned of the same thing on the Spanish Wikipedia. You have been blocked on the Spanish Wikipedia. For Pete's sake, stop adding yourself as the heir to all the titles. You have no references for this and it is a conflict of interest. Bgwhite (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marquisate of Santa Rosa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marquisate of Santa Rosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marquisate of Santa Rosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maragm (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vicecounty of Casa Romana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicecounty of Casa Romana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicecounty of Casa Romana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maragm (talk) 06:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prince of Treano

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Prince of Treano, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vicecounty of Casa Romana

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vicecounty of Casa Romana, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marquisate of Santa Rosa

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Marquisate of Santa Rosa, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrimonial Heritage of House of Borja

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Patrimonial Heritage of House of Borja, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Siredejoinville. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Siredejoinville and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel kenneth (talk^+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 14:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing and the persistent addition of unsourced content and hoaxes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Euryalus (talk) 11:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vicecounty of Casa Romana Chest Arms.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Vicecounty of Casa Romana Chest Arms.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hispanic American Nobility

The article Hispanic American Nobility has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a journal report, nothing suggesting acceptance to Wikipedia, including with needed improvements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Snowycats (talk) 19:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Siredejoinville. You have new messages at Snowycats's talk page.
Message added 19:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Snowycats (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Mariño y Soler

Stop reverting as it just introduces a bunch of errors. Add what you need, not revert. Bgwhite (talk) 21:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop reverting and erased things. I don´t understand your insistence of disturbing. You have more that 5 years disturbing and disturbing and so on. Which is the wrong? the title "Don"? sorry but he was a "Don" he had the title "Don". The battles in which he participated? Sorry but he was in that battles. His studies? Sorry but he studied in Salamanca.

Tell me Bgwhite what is your real problem? Please, respect me and leave of disturbing me. I don´t disturbe you, why reason following after 5 years in the same? Please, don´t eraser more things I am doing with base.

Thank you. --Siredejoinville (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted two edits by different editors. They contained fixes to correct errors. When you reverted, you added the errors back in again. Read the edit summaries as it was also said there. You didn't leave an edit summary on why you reverted, therefore what you did was vandalism.

As I stated in my edit summary. Don't revert, just put back in what you added. Edit summaries!!!! Bgwhite (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Mariño y Soler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freethinker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable references - last warning

I've reverted your edits on Francisco Mariño y Soler. As was left on the article's talk page, you are using unreliable sources. Xenealoxias is not reliable. Xosé Lois Lamigueiro is the site's creator and person who writes most of the material. There is no editorial oversight... nobody to check if facts are correct. From the article's talk page, you can see the problems either you or the Xenealoxias site has caused.

You have been warned and blocked before for not using reliable sources. You have been warned before about putting in false information, adding yourself into articles and edit warring. You were blocked before for month. If this continues any more, the next block will be an indefinite block.

If you need help or need to ask questions, please do. Maragm might be more helpful as she knows Spanish, but I'm also available. Bgwhite (talk) 07:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translating BGwhite's remarks into Spanish: He revertido sus ediciones en el artículo Francisco Mariño y Soler. Tal como se comenta en la página de discusión del artículo, está utilizando fuentes que no son fidedignas. Xenealogías no es una fuente fidedigna. Xosé Lois Lamigueiro es autor de esa página y quien escribe la mayoría de los artículos. No existe una revisión por pares...nadie quien compruebe la veracidad de los datos. En la página de discusión del artículo se menciona los problemas causados por usted o por Xenealogías.

Ya ha sido bloqueado anteriormente por no utilizar fuentes fidedignas. Ya se le ha advertido anteriormente debido a la adición de información falsa, añadiéndose en los artículos y entrando en guerra de reversiones. Fue bloqueado durante un mes. Si sigue así, el próximo bloqueo sera una indefinido.

Si necesita ayuda or desea hacer alguna pregunta, hágalo. Tal vez Maragm pueda ayudar ya que habla castellano, aunque yo también estoy disponible. (firmado Bgwhite). --Maragm (talk) 07:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Siredejoinville Replying to your message on my talk page) I am not trying to disturb you. What I am trying to do, without much success, I'm afraid, is to make you understand that wikipedia is not a personal gen site where you can add original research or information that is not properly referenced. I know that Xenealoxias do Ortegal is a pretty reliable page, in fact, the genealogy that they propose for the Mariño, as shown here, has nothing to do with the information and reference you added and which Bgwhite removed. There is no mention in that page that the Mariños descend from Fernando Pérez de Traba and, as I explained in the talk page of Francisco Mariño y Soler, it is chronologically impossible that Fernando, who died in 1151, could have had a grandson who lived 150 years later (the one who in 1300 sold properties to his brother). Can you understand that that is impossible or are you just so blind and full of yourself and of your presumptive ancestors that you accept such folly? --Maragm (talk) 13:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your info, I posted a question in Estudios Gen (the Xeneoloxías do Ortegal site). The reply is that, no matter how hard some authors have tried to establish a relationship between the Mariño and the Trabas, such relationship does not exist. Also that by 1220 all of Fernando Perez de Traba's grandchildren were dead, so it is impossible that he was the grandfather of the one who is mentioned in the reference that you had used as being an adult in 1300. --Maragm (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Landlord House of Suescún.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Landlord House of Suescún.gif, which you've attributed to www.tripadvisor.co. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:55, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources, again

I can see you've had issues with reliable sources before, including a final warning above. Can you tell me why you feel a very clearly identified mirror of a wikipedia article is a reliable source? The link is here. This has been noted in the edit summary several time; are you having difficulty understaning what is being communicated to you? Kuru (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maragm and Kuru: It is obvious that Siredejoinville either will never get it or just doesn't care. This has gone on long enough and too much time has been wasted. I'd block him right now, but I fill I'm too involved. When I sit down to edit again in a few hours, I'll write up an ANI discussion. Bgwhite (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a similar problem in that I'm reverting very poor sourcing, not vandalism or links to copyright violations, so I'd be uncomfortable taking administrative action. Would like to hear an answer or acknowledgement from the editor, but I suspect this is a language barrier issue. Kuru (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru He's already been warned over fifty times and has already been blocked for it. He is indef blocked on the Spanish Wikipedia. He is using es:Usuario discusión:Ruiz-Mariño on eswiki. That account has been blocked on enwiki as a sockpuppet of Siredejoinville (I don't think the sockpuppeting is intentional). Bgwhite (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Valentinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valence (France). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Count of Valentinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Duke of Valentinois. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa Could you specify what Siredejoinville copied.

Once again Siredejoinville you are doing disruptive editing. You are reverting people's edits and you are not referencing material. All book and long paper refs must have page numbers so your statements can be verified. As you have made up things in the past, any material without references will be removed. You have used refs, but made up things the refs didn't source, therefore the refs must be verifiable. You've been given more than enough chances to comply. Bgwhite (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed in this edit is copied without paraphrasing from the public domain source Sabatini, Rafael. The Life of Cesar Borgia (1891). — Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for disruptive editing and the persistent addition of unsourced content and hoaxes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Bgwhite (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest edit to Duke of Valentinois gave unsourced statements. You also gave a sentence (D. Luisa Borja (Borgia) y d'Albret de Châtillon-Limoges) in which the ref didn't back up the statement. You have been warned untold times to use references and statements that can be verified. Bgwhite (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Francisco Mariño y Soler.jpg

Hello, Siredejoinville. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Francisco Mariño y Soler.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [e-mail]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Monumento a Simón Bolivar, Francisco Mariño y Soler e Ignacio Mariño y Torres.jpg

Hello, Siredejoinville. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Monumento a Simón Bolivar, Francisco Mariño y Soler e Ignacio Mariño y Torres.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [e-mail]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Tomb of Don Francisco Mariño y Soler and his wife Doña Camila Franco y Currea.jpg

Hello, Siredejoinville. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Tomb of Don Francisco Mariño y Soler and his wife Doña Camila Franco y Currea.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [e-mail]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Francisco Mariño y Soler library.jpg

Hello, Siredejoinville. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Francisco Mariño y Soler library.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [e-mail]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Landlord House of las Ayalas.jpg

Hello, Siredejoinville. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Landlord House of las Ayalas.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [e-mail]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [e-mail] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Siredejoinville. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on House of Borgia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC) }[reply]

• • • I am sorry but those who have reversed everything I have done; Still, supported by verifiable references, are precisely those people. People who have no scruple to harm the work of others for personal interests. I do not want to enter into empty discussions that will not get us anywhere. It is very clear that wikipedia is privately owned by a few who write what they crave under the veil of ignorance and support by making bulling those who wish to correct them. I'm not interested in either Monaco or his dukedom or any of that, because that's precisely the whole damn problem. It is simple. So, good day, from now on I will tell all my students that 80% Wikipedia is junk and the other 20 is a total fallacy. If you want to gape, go ahead, it's their damn custom when they're told the truth. ....

I wish you a happy new year and that 2017, bring you great benefits and pleasures.

--Siredejoinville (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Siredejoinville. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

For your info, I reported you at the Administrator's noticeboard, as you can see here. You continue to add false info, false titles, adding very unreliable refs, such as the page that you created in geneanet. Maragm (talk) 13:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Final warning for repeated creation/recreation of blatant hoaxes (see the umpteen warnings, deletion messages etc further up on this page). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 21:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (Help!) 22:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siredejoinville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

excuse but I don´t understand why reason you blocked me, today I have no done any edition in english wikipedia and least in page of Don Francisco Mariño y Soler created by me. On the other hand, I just was correcting some points in translation of Francisco Mariño y Soler at spanish in spanish wikipedia, so that, I solicite you one claire explanation in front to know what for. .... In case contrar, please unblocked me I am the writer of that page and that page is just based in historical facts. Thak you. --Siredejoinville (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a very long history of adding false information to Wikipedia, based on unreliable sources, in part ones written by yourself. That had to stop. Huon (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siredejoinville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here Oh, I just see the page, you have changed other time the point about spouses. Look, wikipedia has a norm to write such point, one speciphic code. The person who insist in put term first or second is a descendant of Francisco Mariño y Soler who think this order bring to him some benefit; nothing farthest of this. The titles of this person were asigned to one speciphic person by right authorities and no one of these titles bring with them any economical benefit, they are just titles in name, no more no least; so that, I solicite you respectfull leave to make you do. It really doesn´t matter and that will not change the titles rehabilitation asigment. If the person in question wants to know why reason Mrs. Ana María Pinzon descendants can not claim the titles, I can explain to him, It is very simply, the titles just can heir by legitime male descendants of a legal catholic marriage, and when the line was rupted the inheritance right passed legally to a legitime non agnatice heir of legal marriage. In the case of Doña Ana María Pinzón, her marriage was nulled by vatican, papal dispense because wedding of Francisco Mariño y Soler with Doña Camila Franco y Currea. If the person wish conserve in this page such type of docuental writing concerning the spouses order, well, he can but then Wikipedia would be wrong because wikipedia has a way to write these points. So, it´s cleare the person blocked me is the same person who pretend such thing. Please, a honest and correct wikilibrarian that arrange this thing and unblocked me, thank you. that person lives to change users along time.

Decline reason:

This has been going on for a very long time now. It's not appropriate for the Wikipedia. Perhaps you'd be happy elsewhere, given that you have no intention of changing your editing. Yamla (talk) 02:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While a source for the order of marriages (or the marriages in general) would be nice, that's not the issue. Edits such as these are the problem. Huon (talk) 01:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siredejoinville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

sorry but the reason why is the reason, no matter which was your excuse. Really I don´t wish to discusse anymore. Reality is if I had no created this page no one descandant of him would has knowledge about him, perhaps because he was a honest man in a country where all heroes in general and actual leaders were and are corrupted. Facts are there, bust with titles, chest of arms used by him, his genealogy that all of his descendants know, also the fact he had ask Pope of that time his first null marriage. The Pope dispense, his documental papers and pictures placed in National Museum of Colombia and National Library and in his born town. ...... .... Ladies and gentlemen, reason is the reason, no matter how which are your excuse posted here. The just only legitmazed heirs of Francisco Mariño y Soler come from Doña Camila Franco y Currea, from Don Pioquinto Benjamín Mariño y Franco born in 1848 and from Doña Ana Mercedes Mariño Galeano. That is one thing I can´t change, neither Pope or Spanish King can change that because their laws in that theme. It is not a Colombian law matter because one republic has no noble titles neither given but Vatican and Spanish law yes....... I don´t wish discusse anymore, the thruth is in wikipedia there are few honest people and nost part dishonest people and that´s real thing, for that reason wikipedia has so much incongruences in all aspects, that is known by all institutions and people around the world and is very sad, because wikipedia was created with a good intention. Thanks.--Siredejoinville (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Proposed deletion of File:Chest of Arms of Marquisate of Santa Rosa, Great of Spain, Pr.jpg

The file File:Chest of Arms of Marquisate of Santa Rosa, Great of Spain, Pr.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lordship of Saboya Chest of Arms.gif

The file File:Lordship of Saboya Chest of Arms.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:House of Bourbon Busset.png

The file File:House of Bourbon Busset.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:County of San Juan Chest Arms.gif

The file File:County of San Juan Chest Arms.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coat of Arms of Cesar Borgia.jpg

The file File:Coat of Arms of Cesar Borgia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arms of Borja Family.jpg

The file File:Arms of Borja Family.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arms of Borja Ceballos Family.jpg

The file File:Arms of Borja Ceballos Family.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arms Ruiz de Borja-Haro.jpg

The file File:Arms Ruiz de Borja-Haro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Duke of Gandia and Marquiss of Lombay - Great of Spain.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Duke Paire of Valentinois.jpg

The file File:Duke Paire of Valentinois.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]