Hi Similardi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Play the Siren has been reverted. Your edit here to Play the Siren was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMqSPTP1csk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Yoon Ji-sung[reply]
If there is no source for the information you want to add, the information should not be added. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia containing information from verifiable sources. I noticed that you replaced the information about the band. If you look at the edit history for the article, you'll see that another editor (not me) took it out again. JimVC3 (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As I noted above, the information you added has already been deleted by another editor. If you want to add it back or add new information, you must site a reliable source. Some websites qualify as reliable sources. For more information on what sources you can use, please read WP:RSE. JimVC3 (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. We won't block your account this time for your gross incivility, but if it happens again it will be the last time you edit the word's 5th largest website.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Notability
I'm afraid that you misunderstand what we mean by notability. You are using a subjective definition but not ours. Please read WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (music). Accusing experienced editors of vandalism is not the way to go, you should be asking why your edits aren't satisfactory.
The information you need in order to edit within policy have already been given to you by Doug Weller. Please familiarize yourself with those. I recommend asking questions if there is something that you do not understand, since we appreciate individuals who put in hard work. — nihlus kryik (talk) 11:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
September 2017
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
With regard to this which on your user page is divisive and probably comes under WP:POLEMIC, the people who complain about admins are the ones who didn't read the rules before posting or editing/creating articles, then entered stage left with bombast and rudeness when their edits were reverted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If i can say what i'm thinking about you guys, i'm probably gonna be ban x) Seriously did you guys ever wondered why everyone complains/hates you? Go look a bit on the net, there's like a thousand pages about it... Similardi (talk) 15:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I could spend an hour explaining how wrong his facts are about how we work. A few: "Administrators use heinous “automatic users” called bots to accomplish the task of stalking down users (although the admins are barely human, they can’t possibly watch over millions of Wikipedia users). These bots are the administrators’ assistants, and thousands of them are crawling all over Wikipedia, and at the slightest bit of a mishap, they’ll leave a horrific message on your talk page and notify all the admins." - That's nonsense, we don't have bots to assist us stalking down users. Bots do tag possible vandalism for anyone to see, but they aren't "our assistants". Nor do bots that leave talk page messages notify anyone. It's nonsense to suggest that whenever you logon an Admin is there to keep an eye on you. Another one - the blog author hasn't a clue about the American freedom of speech bit of the Constitution, which is a constraint on governments. Private websites, newspapers, etc don't have to allow anyone who wants to have a page or a column. Read Wikipedia:Free speech. Doug Wellertalk18:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
... -...- can we end this conversation now? Like what have been made is made and nothing can change (probably), i used to love Wikipedia (as thousand of other people) but the way it works and it's ... resident ... made me .. urf .. so continue your job guys, you're doing it fine ;) So much bad energy on this website anyway ...
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Similardi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Similardi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
