User talk:Shekhartagra

HALRIS

Hi. While no doubt important, your article on this item of software is missing various important things. it refers in several places to 'jamabandi', and a 'mutation module', but provides no explanation of what either of these are, rendering sections of the article incomprehensible to people not actually familiar with the system - you may know what they are, but I don't :-) I'd be grateful if you could try and improve the article a bit. Thanks. CultureDrone (talk) 08:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jamabandi

A tag has been placed on Jamabandi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TrulyBlue should be truly ashamed of tagging this article. I think that even in the state that TrulyBlue saw it, it did contain enough context. I have re-instated it and removed the copyvio. Over to you to improve it.

I took one look at http://web1.hry.nic.in/jamabandihry/Terms_u.aspx and my mouse flew of its own accord towards the "history" tab to leave my standard message: "Where Is It Written That You Should Start Every Word Of A Sentence With A Capital Letter?" Then I realsied I was not in Wikipedia. Well done for fixing the capitals - unfortunately that is not enough to stop it being a copyright violation. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jamabandi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jamabandi was changed by Shekhartagra (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-02-03T10:49:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Land record documents of Haryana

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Land record documents of Haryana, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Land record documents of Haryana is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Land record documents of Haryana, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haryana Land Record Information System

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Haryana Land Record Information System, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Disputed tags

1.) The neutrality is not disputed. I have analysed it and accept it as fine and fit for wikipedia. 2.) The page has enough citations for it to exist, also there is not much need for citations as most is basic fact. 3.) The article does not require a clean up either.

Trust me, this is my professional opinion.

I can see your Indian, (i am too), but on wikipedia you can not let your pride cloud your professionalism, it is more than just obvious why you keep targeting this page with any petty reason to cause problems. It can be seen on the page's talk page.

Finally, GROW UP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BhainsRajput (talk • contribs) 10:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GROW UP!!!

You defy the rules of Wikipedia: Your not NEUTRAL! Your anti-pakistan and anti-pakistani-kashmir and so do not deserve a say. Only people who are NEUTRAl do! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BhainsRajput (talk • contribs) 15:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

iloveindia, indianactors and IMDb are not reliable sources. Please cite reliable sources, preferably newspapers. Do not reinsert without sources. Shahid • ^Talk2me 08:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm down. IMDb is good only for hard data like films and appearances. The other info on the site is edited by users. Please see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We don't add info with "fact" tags. Anything new that is added should be added with a source. The fact that there's already one fact tag on the article does not mean we can add another. If this is added, so I agree it should be in the personal life section, but first find reliable sources. Also, the info in personal life is not controversial. The inf you intend to add is unverified. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ballu

Thanks a lot for the constructive edit to the Ballu wiki page. Really appreciate that. Regards 122.169.52.19 (talk) 04:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Shekhartagra, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]