User talk:SharisnaOrphaned non-free image File:22px-Flag of Kurdistan.svg.pngThanks for uploading File:22px-Flag of Kurdistan.svg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE:
Kurdish peopleHello. Read WP:lead. The lead is a summery of the whole article, so the information of the lead can't be considered redundancy. I suggest to have a fast look to similar articles about how different ethnics articles are writte. Take into account most of the people in middle east are indigenous and in Wikipedia we don't need to provide source for facts. For example you don't need to write Paris is capital of France[1][2][3]. Thanks.--Aliwiki (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Again, the information is still redundant. The information about which I am considering redundant is contained in the lead itself. The lead already mentions that the linguistic relation of the languages spoken by the Kurdish people as Iranian and this does not need to mentioned twice in the same lead of the article. Furthermore, this is also not appropriate as the opener of the lead of an article about the Kurdish people since it is specifically about the language of the Kurdish people, and does not take other aspects into consideration. Again, please refer to Wikipedia's policy against redundancy in the content section of the guidelines. Sharisna (talk) 14 December 2010 (UTC) No hard feelingI just wanted to apologize for any harsh words I may have uttered.. "Iranic" I think is a compromise here since there many sources that state it. I would happy to correspond via email in order to clear up any misunderstanding. You can email me when you activate your wiki-email. Thanks and your presence is needed. --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2010 (UTC) Hi If you prefer Iranic than I think that is good. You might want to mention WP:concensus. As an active user in that article, I have no problem with substitution of Iranic for Iranian for that specific article (only). Of course when discussing ancient history, I prefer Iranian rather than Iranic. Thank you. --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Hi, I added Iranic but I did remove the other soource since the author is a lecturer and he also claims weird theories like Sumerians/Elamites were turks and quotes poorpiraar, etc.. By the way I am trying to get an assessment of all the epic poetry in non-Peresian Iranian languages. I have found Shahnaameyeh Laki. And I have heard there are many epics of the Sistan cycle in Gurani-Kurdish as well. If you know anything about this, please let me know. Thanks--Khodabandeh14 (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC) Jeshn Nowruz Piruz Bet.--Khodabandeh14 (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC) February 2015 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kurds. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. -- Sam Sing! 00:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC) Hi, Sharisna. This article has been subject to editing that has attempted to deflect from consensus toward some goal that at times appeared less than neutral. Your edit summary indicated that you were trimming one reference and leaving one. Could you quote the one you left? Another question; have you read the discussions on the article talk page? Tiderolls 02:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your response, Sharisna. Consensus often changes; this is why I have been urging those editors that have an interest in the subject to visit the article talk page and make their cases. I would hope that the editors that regularly edit those articles would be receptive to reasonable discussion. I also hope that you find the time to make use of the article discussion. Again, thanks for taking the time to respond. Tiderolls 22:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Kurds RFCYou tried to change the wording specifically agreed in the RFC. You can't do that. The first reference to the Kurds being an ethnic Iranian group in the first sentence was not part of the RFC. If you take "Iranian" out of that I won't revert you - but I can't say what others would do. DeCausa (talk) 22:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia