Awarded for launching WP:SVT. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to send this your way before you retired. I deeply appreciate your encouraging words at ANI all those years ago when I first reported a case of sneaky vandalism to the admins who couldn't see the vandalism staring them in the face. It was very good to know that I wasn't just growing paranoid and that there were others (i.e. you) who could see what was really going on. I've directed several others to SVT in the years since then. Thanks for your brilliant anti-vandalism work! Please come back when you've had a bit of a breather from this place. -Thibbs (talk) 04:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowserCheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Among the sources on page are two interviews which don't clear, one review from Losing Today which might be a blog (or at least doesn't look overly reliable), and a very short piece from Gothamist. Of all the things not in this article, I was surprised to find tworeviews from AllMusic. I don't see enough between those and Gothamist to pass notability, and the rest is unreliable. Found nothing else.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.