|
User talk:Scientelensia/Archive1
November 2022
Discretionary alert for J. K. Rowling This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place See also WP:WIAFA, WP:FAOWN and Wikipedia:Featured article review/J. K. Rowling/archive1; please gain consensus before adding content previously discussed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussionHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Scientelensia. Thank you. I am concerned that you are not understanding how Wikipedia works, and the importance of gaining consensus for your edits on the article talk page. Please respond at the thread above. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Welcome! Getting StartedTutorial The Teahouse The Task Center  Tips
Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Reactions from Wizarding World Actors in Response to JK Rowling’s Comments on Gender and Sex (December 25)
December 2022
Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 132Your edit to Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 132 was reverted by another editor. At the top of that page it says: "This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page". - David Biddulph (talk) 13:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC) Best wishes for the New YearI’m sorry to see you have been topic-banned from gender matters. But you must now observe this very strictly, or you will be blocked from editing. If in doubt, don’t do the edit. I sympathise with the problems you have been having with the other editor – I have had similar problems. They are impossible to deal with. But look on the bright side – anything to do with gender is contentious on Wikipedia, and there is an enormous amount of unpleasantness in this area. Since you will now not be editing in this area for a year, you will be avoiding all the unpleasantness. In other areas, Wikipedia editors can be quite pleasant. I hope you don’t give up editing Wikipedia. And have a happy New Year! Regards Sweet6970 (talk) 10:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pelé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saldanha. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC) Happy New Year, Scientelensia!  Scientelensia, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. Abishe (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Brontë (January 10)
HalloI suggest you revert your recent thoughts on the article on the bill. Topic bans cover Talk pages as well as articles. Sweet6970 (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate you've given considerable thought to this - but as I should have said, topic bans apply to all pages. And please see WP:PROXYING. Regards Sweet6970 (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Scientelensia, my concern about your editing continues to be principally one of WP:IDHT—that you just don't seem to read and take on board the seriousness of our policies and guidelines here, nor do you appear to even read the things posted to you. After your topic ban from gender-related subjects, you were warned about your edits at Kate Forbes above, and your response was to lodge a personal attack on the editor who informed you ( Now, in this section, another editor has informed you that topic bans apply to talk pages, and suggested you revert your talk addition at Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland). Now worse, you asked another editor to proxy for you, which has the effect of skirting around your topic ban, and had they done so, would have gotten Sweet6970 into trouble as well. (Sweet6970 removed your request to them to proxy and I see that an IP reverted the talk page post.) I am willing to accept that you may not yet understand all of our policies, and they can be a lot to take on, but I continue to be concerned, not so much with the quality of your commentary and content additions (which can be quite good), but that you do not seem willing to read, digest, or take on the board the need to take Wikipedia seriously. I'm happy that Sweet6970 is watching out for you, but you don't seem to be internalizing the need to slow down or understand how serious a topic ban is. I was going to notify the admins from your arb enforcement case about this, and you would likely have been blocked, until I realized you probably had removed the talk page post as an IP, which is good;[1] I suggest you also might deal with the personal attack in the section above, and please read thoroughly all of the info posted to you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
