|
User talk:Scetoaux/Archive 2
Image:Maryland State Trooper 3.jpgI understnad it's your image, and you can do with it want you want. Anyway, I'm just curious as to why you're removing it, as it is a nice image. I don't beleive we have an image of a MD State Police helicopter in that scheme anywhere else, and it certainly is unique. Again, I'm just curious, and not rying to pry in anyway. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 06:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, totally understandable. You can delete this post if you need to, and even get an admin to remove it from your visible history - I have no problem with that. - BillCJ (talk) 06:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC) QuestionWhy did you tag my recently created redirect for speedy deletion? I'm sure you were right to do so and am not going to remove the tag, but I was just curious, as I don't personally see anything wrong with it. Valtoras (talk) 03:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Please helpHi can you please help me. I would love to have userboxes on my user page which I have no clue how to do it. Many thanks in advance!XxtruemoxX (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)XxtruemoxX English translation of "Leck mir den Arsch fein recht schön sauber"...Is as I put it in the article, which you reverted as vandalism ... LOL. :) Antandrus (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Secret Page
Your question about TwinkleI answered your question regarding the use of Twinkle at Clpo13's RFA. I hope it's satisfactory. If not, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Useight (talk) 23:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
You mentioned that you voted neutral because Aleta has only beed editing for 2 months. It was me (the nom) who has been editing for 2 months. She has been editing since 2006. I'm not trying to get you to change yout vote, just explaining that you're mistaken about her experience. Thanks. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA analysisI've added some code to your userpage to add the RfA analysis - it uses {{hidden}} for the show/hide box. --h2g2bob (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
FPCI missed that. Sorry. Anyways, I uploaded a cropped version here - Milk's Favorite Cookie 19:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC) Kurt WeberIt's not worth replying to his RfA cut and paste oppose. He posts the same message at every single self-nom RfA and he never actually checks out whether the editor is worthy. Just ignore what he says. The 'crats do. Enigma msg! 00:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Size usernameI've been over at RfA today and your username size does rather...stand out some. It's kind of obtrusive IMO. Just asking if you'd please give some consideration to shrinking it down a bit as its quite a distraction. Anyway, its no big deal and I'm not gonna be on your case about it. Enjoy ya break. All the best, Plutonium27 (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Happy First Day of Spring!Happy First Day of Spring!   Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message. my RFA
vacI was away on Easter vacation. If you're still interested, I'll consider. If not, good luck with whomever you choose :) - Revolving Bugbear 20:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC) The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I saw you doing a bit of vandal fighting when you beat me to a vandal reversion :P, so I decided to give you a barnstar :). Congrats on your new barnstar :),--Mifter (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC) UserboxI saw on your user page that you were a Cadet Chief Master Sergeant in the Civil Air Patrol, so I went out and found that someone (not me) had made a bunch of Civil Air Patrol user boxes, so I looked and I found the one that was equivalent to your rank.
I've replied to you......on my talkpage, in case you aren't watchlisting it. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Cessna Citation CJ1I had just merged the Cessna Citation CJ1 to Cessna CitationJet, but forgot to put in the redirect tag. I came back two minutes later, and saw you had marked it for deletion. In the case of merged content, the original page is not to be deleted so that the history can remain, and for GFDL purposes. I don't know the exact policies on this, but that is what I have been told by admins in similar situations. You might want to ask an admin to double-check on this, but I'm pretty sure my memory is correct on this. - BillCJ (talk) 03:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
coachingYou appear to be relatively new, active for about two months. That's not actually a problem, but it sort of influences the way we might go about a coaching. If you are interested in becoming an admin, what you will need most is simply time, activity, and exposure. You will want to become familiar with the many ins and outs of Wikipedia. There are many things to learn about administrative responsibilities and privileges, but there are many, many more to learn simply about the way things go on Wikipedia. Sometimes you can even things about the way things don't work. What I would suggest, then, is more of a medium-term mentorship-style coaching. I would be more than happy to do this with you. It would consist of admin topics and just general Wikipedia topics. This is not, of course, to imply that your relative newness means you "need instruction" in the ways of Wikipedia, but there are some things that you will simply come to appreciate and be more comfortable with over time. Most of what admins do stems directly from general Wikipedia ideas anyways. In a couple of months, if all goes well, you'll be amply prepared to tackle adminship. How do you feel about this idea? - Revolving Bugbear 17:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Recent RfcI looked at the Rfc very briefly, and think it was a little premature. You may wish to keep the links and stuff you used in the Rfc outside of Wikipedia, but it might be a good idea to request an admin to delete the Rfc in its entirity. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Your navigation barI like your navigation bar. Do you mind if I use it and modify it for my own userpage? — scetoaux (T/C) 21:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Rather disappointedI have tried to be reasonable over the RfC that you saw fit to raise against me, but I really do think that your recent comments are pushing things just a little too far. [1] Whatever differences you may have with any other editor in no way justifies your attitude towards me, or your decision to initiate an RfC. I am rather disappointed that you have allowed yourself to lapse into the same kind of incivility that you have so recently condemned in others. My RfC is about my behaviour; how anyone else may choose to behave is a matter entirely for them, and in no way justifies your own behaviour, or reflects on mine. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Really?You of course know my poistion over the RfC, so forgive my intrusion and I hope you don't perceive my post here as "clouded" in bias. However, I've seen your recent changes to keep the RfC going. The RfC, to date, has nearly unanimously been labelled as an overreaction or wrong venue, including a retraction by yourself. What good will come of keeping this open? What is Malleus' "continued behavior"? (from your edit summary). I'm asking honestly and assuming good faith. You and I seemed to be able to have a civil conversation even though we disagreed strongly. What's the difference here? What has Malleus done or not done to since the RfC to merit a retraction of your retraction? I've read his post here, and your reply on his talk. I'm not seeing any incivility. What are you hoping for? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Officially deletedThe RfC is officially deleted as uncertified (see my post on the Bureaucrats' noticeboard). I wish you well, Sce-to-Aux, I sincerely hope there are no hard feelings. The irony (from my point of view) in all of this, is that my first experience with Malleus was eerily similar to yours, and I told him so. I hope that you and I will be able to see eye to eye as co-editors of this wacky website. (I'm not planning on leaving, and I hope you don't either.) Let me know if there is ever anything you ever need help with, I'll be glad to be of assistance. Cheers, and happy editing, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :)For reverting vandalism on my userpage. It doesn't go unappreciated :) Steve Crossin (talk to me) 18:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey!Thank you for fixing some obvious mistakes on my Zane Floyd article. I'm quite new to the article creation process, so I don't know a lot of the shortcuts. Regardless, thank you for your kind help. Tribulation725 (talk) 03:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Using the honorific "the Prophet"Please read WP:MOSISLAM before continuing to edit the encyclopedia. It is against wiki policies to use honorifics such as "prophet". Also you reverted back into what is supposed to be an encyclopedia that the quran "is the revealed word of Allah". This is not language used by a rational scietific individual now is it? I suggest you read up on wiki policy as described above and revert yourself. Sharif Abdul (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC) I'm not really a barnstar kind of guy, but...
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
