This is an archive of past discussions with User:SatyrTN. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thanks for updating the infobox on the Plymouth, NH page... but your new map is slightly off. Plymouth is actually just a tad North from where you placed it. If you could change it that would be great. (I would but my image editing software doesn't seem to be advanced enough to do so without turning the whole map orange). Thanks --Prezboy114:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah I think that the dot's placement seems more accurate but I want to say maybe just a tad higher. Look here to see where Plymouth is located (in yellow) if you want to double check.
Hi. I was only in the area for a short time, very nice place. I have a picture of the Chocorua welcome sign and some shots from Glen Ellis Falls, I cant remember if there close to Tamworth or not. Hossens2715:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Is there any reason why you are using Template:Infobox City when there is an existing Template:Infobox Town NH? While the NH Infobox could use some updating - which is currently underway at Template:Infobox Town NH/test - the City one does not take into consideration the type of governments that NH towns have. Please use the NH infobox in keeping with Wikipedia:WikiProject New Hampshire. The NH Infobox has gone through Tfd once, and the result was to keep. I know its a lot of work updating the town infoboxes, but keeping with the project would be helpful. Also, it would be wonderful to have another NH editor in the project! --Assawyer17:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, SatyrTN. Thanks for your note. Basically, Infobox City only provides for leader_title and leader_name, whereas Infobox Town MA, for example, has government_name, allowing for the kind of town meeting the town governs itself with. It also has board_of_selectmen, where the names of the selectmen can be listed. --AaronS14:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Farmington-Town-Seal.gif. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
Hi, MD! Actually, I was planning on getting feedback regarding the merges from WikiProject:Thomas. I hadn't gotten to posting there yet - sometimes the internet is quicker than one's fingers :) I can see there's been a little discussion about merging that happened before I put in the tags. Shall I go ahead and remove the tags and put in redirects?
Please note that:
I didn't "assume that they could all be merged" - that's why I put in the tags to open discussion. Cavalierly adding the redirects without discussion - now that would be assuming :)
I didn't even know there was a related WikiProject when I started adding the tags. If the pages remain separate, which is totally cool, they should definitely be categorized and have WP:Thomas added to their discussion pages.
Hi, i didnt want to move it. it is out of place where it is now . i did leave a message on the discussion board, why i was moving it. the GEOGRAPHY header would not left justify like all the headers. dont know why. when i find out i will return it to the proper sequence. joe03:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi SatyrTN:
take a look at the position of the word Geography. It is centered on the line, and not left justified. This was the anonoly that i was trying to avoid. There must be a bug in the program. So I may fool around with it a few more times to see if i can get it left justified. Thanx for your help. joe12:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thanx for the input. i know what the problem is, but dont know how to fix it yet. my browser is ms internet explorer. but i am using a 30" monitor. if i reduce the size of the dialog box to less than 20" the word Geography lefts justifies. I will have to keep that in mind. When my dialog box exceeds 21" the word Georgraphy, and only the word Geography centers itself.
i will eventually figure it out. case closed for the time being. glad we are now in consistent mode.
Yep, by hand. Does not take that long, one cut and a lot of pasting. The hardest part is getting the edit comment correct. Vegaswikian18:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Yea, there is an autofill box. However do you know how many entries it has? The error I was making on those updates was using cat instead of sort. Easy to type without the autofill box being useful. Vegaswikian18:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Town elevations
Hi there, No problem on the minor word changes for Claremont and Clarksville. Actually, I think those happened when the Smackbot ran through there a few months ago. I've been enjoying seeing the updates you've been making to all of the towns, and just ran across those two fixes because I wanted to reread the town high point sentences that I'd put in earlier. (Do I have a life?) That's a good idea about the town elevations; I'll try to take a look at them when I get a chance. (I'm sure seeing your steady updates every day will remind me...) See you, --Ken Gallager14:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Categories
The categorization system is having growing pains. There seem to be several different view about what our category system should be; a way to browse, an index of articles, a classification system, and/or a database search tool. Each of these views leads editors to different conclusions about how categories should be populated, and many conflicts result. To deal with these problems, Rick Block and I have been working on a proposal to add the ability to create category intersections. We think our proposal will address these problems and add some very useful new features. We are asking editors and developers concerned with categorizaton problems to take a look. We'd appreciate your feedback. Thanks. -- Samuel Wantman06:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Wiki's LGBT community
Heh, I remember reading a discussion about bringing in a welcome template of some kind for LGBT related stuff. Nice to see you got that up and running. -- Steel11:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation. My interest in LGBT issues is largely civil rights oriented, inasmuch as I'm a card-carrying member of the ACLU. That said, I've had LGBT friends off and on since high school. On social issues I'm a flaming libertarian! Kencf21:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Thansk as well for the invite. I'm interested in LGBT studies as a historian and as an ally, and I'd love to add what I can! Elefuntboy23:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome, y'all! Feel free to add the notice board and/or WikiProject to your watch lists. And sign up on the notice board membership, if you'd like! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)02:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Jaster! I did include the "User notnarrow" userbox when I was figuring out who's userpages to add the welcome box to. Maybe I shouldn't? I figured "not narrow" would mean at least marginally interested in LGBT concerns - and allies are always welcome! Thoughts? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)15:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the invite to the LGBT studies community. :) Unfortunately, I don't really specialize in LGBT studies or topics (I'm also straight, so I can't really help there, either), so I probably can't contribute a whole lot. Maybe I'll join if I start looking into it later. --Coredesattalk. o_O02:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
That would be great! As I said above, allies are always welcome! And I'm sure you know that sometimes an "outside" POV can be critical. Thanks for stopping by! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)03:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
NH leader lists
Sorry about that. It briefly crossed my mind that you might have done it the other way on purpose as well (not?). I'm going through a list of articles I made that reference the infobox and have an HTML break in them anywhere. Seems like most of the NH articles show up. I'm not sure if Ligulem has finished yet (his latest progress report says 400 left). The list of articles with breaks has something like 500 articles in it (not all have breaks in the infobox). Seems like it will take a good long time to work through the whole list. -- Rick Block (talk)
Nope - didn't do it that way on purpose. As you can see from the code, I put in the <br>s for the third and greater — and didn't even think to put it for the second, thereby keeping it on one line. Forest through the trees and all that :)
By the way, I'm curious if you know the answer to something that's been bothering me about CI. Are the cats of an article stored separately from the article itself? Or are they just lines of text in the article? From what I gather, you're a technical person, so you'll see that the latter is a huge overload of resources when you're searching for something, while the former would make CI much easier to implement.
Yeah, I'm a technical sort of person (I've been a programmer/software architect for 30 years). There's a database that has a record for each article/category in each category, indexed by category. The record has a pointer to the article/category that's been added to the category (this database is effectively an index by category). I think this corresponds to your notion that the cats are stored separately, but the "category" line exists in the article as well. There are several databases like this underlying various MediaWiki features ("whatlinkshere" is another one - even the article titles are in a database containing a pointer to where the content is).
Note that the category display limit of 200 articles at a time was implemented as a defensive performance technique. Large categories used to be displayed in their entirety, requiring all the database records for the category to be fetched all at once. For categories with 1000's of articles, this was a problem since there's ultimately a single monster of a PC running effectively a single database behind all of Wikipedia's traffic. I suspect intersections are likely to have the same sort of issue and it may not be solvable, since (in the worst case) there is no intersection but you don't know this until you've fetched all the records. The point is that even stored separately overload may be an issue. -- Rick Block (talk) 03:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
I would think that if it were stored correctly, it's a simple query for an intersection. Of course, I'm not a database expert - I work with them (MySQL) in a PHP capacity, but I suspect I don't use them as efficiently as I could :) Thanks for the info, though, and thanks again for your work on NH towns! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)04:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
The query is simple, but the amount of disk/cpu time it takes varies with the size of the DB. Huge databases (e.g. category:Living people, with 70,000 entries) take a (relatively) significant amount of time to read all the way through. Radiant! wrote some code implementing an extension for intersection (you might want to take a look at it, there's a link from the CI talk page). Like you suspect, the code is not terribly complicated (boils down to a single query). The issue is what impact executing such a query might have on the rest of the system. My guess is if we can't afford to just read a large category (although maybe there was something else involved in the 200 at a time limit), we surely can't afford to intersect one. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Flipside
Thanks for the comment and the info box on the article. Yes I attended this year's event and took the photo in the article. Drop me an email, I have something to share offline. SteveHopson00:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding the {{Project New Hampshire}} tag to the abovementioned talk page. As the creator and author of the associated article, I can say that it is not now, nor has ever been a part of, nor has recieved significant contributions from a member of, Project New Hampshire. While your intentions are good, I have deleted your efforts four times over and will continue to do so. Save yourself and myself some time by letting the Gazette article be. Thanks. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*>01:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I looked at the latest "addition" to the Keene article per your request, and I'd agree that the text in question doesn't exactly enhance the article. (If I had to guess, I'd say it's probably a local kid ragging on another part of town. As far as I know, there aren't any actual "Ghettos" in Keene.) If you want to remove it, I'd say go for it. JayDuck14:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Winnipesaukee's size
Hi there. Got your note about checking up on Lake Winnipesaukee's size ranking in the US. My most readily-available lake and stream information is for New Hampshire only, but I can probably ferret out some other resources. I noticed when that statement got removed and believe the person is probably right, but it would be really interesting to get an actual rank. Later...--Ken Gallager15:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi - What source do you have for the geographic center of New Hampshire being in Thornton? I've been telling people that it's in Ashland, based, I believe, on something the U.S. Geological Survey put out a long time ago. It would be interesting to see what the source used to come up with Thornton. See you... --Ken Gallager20:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I see how you got it. Thornton would be the center of the smallest rectangle in which you could fit New Hampshire. But the state gets narrower as you go north, so much of that rectangle where Thornton is the center would include Vermont. There are GIS routines that calculate the centroid of a polygon; I could run that at work and see what comes up. (In school a long time ago, we would practice locating the centroid by making a cardboard cutout of a shape and figuring out what point you would have to attach a string to make the shape balance perfectly when you dangled it...) --Ken Gallager14:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, that was interesting! Just ran the centroid, using ArcInfo. Turns out that it's in New Hampton, just south of the Ashland line and just west of Center Harbor (see image).
Hey - kinda near me :) Kewl! Put that in the New Hampton article and I'll take it out of Thornton. I'm still trying to figure out the calculations for determining the center of population, which would be much further south. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)17:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
LGBT welcome
Thanks for the box on my talk page about the LGBT community (a while ago). Although it's true that I'm gay, I don't tend to focus on gay articles or issues any more than any others. Thanks for the message anyway! ConDemTalk08:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for writing, ConDem! I, too, don't tend to focus on gay articles. But I feel like the community should be watchful and participate when possible. So I'm glad to see you on here :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)21:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Firefly
Hi SatyrTN, I created the page for Firefly Arts Collective. Since you're a burner who lives near the event I'm curious if you've ever attended? There is a user questioning if the article is worthy of being in Wikipedia. Since you're a more experienced Burner Wikipedian I thought you might be able to add to the discussion . . . please! Also, somewhat unrelated I did work on Sandwich, NH and the Sandwich Fair. ForestJay18:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, ForestJay! I haven't made it to Firefly, unfortunately! I've been to Transformus for the past two years, and that's about the extent of my burning experience :) I've contributed to the discussion on the talk page and will watch for any tinkering or attempted removal. And thanks for helping out with Sandwich! I haven't done much on there but work on standardizing it to look like all the other towns and cities in NH.
Thank you for the help! :) Until I started going to burner events I found very few people that were anything like me. I haven't been to Transformus but I'm friends with people who have been. I'm focusing all my vacation, money, and energy to make sure I get to Burning Man 2007. Hopefully I can make it to Firefly and Spring Wildfire too. ForestJay02:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
NP! I'm definitely going to Transformus 2007 - hopefully I'll see you there! I go by Ribbon and will be camping with the Radical Faeries. I won't be going to BM - I'm actually a little scared of the thought of 40,000 artists! And if I'm around, I'll be going to Firefly for sure! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)02:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Colorado Center of Population
Your original research regarding Colorado's center of population is fraught with inaccuracies. The coordinates on the referenced list are in a rural, mountainous area well over five miles outside of the Littleton city limits (yes, it is the City of Littleton, not the Town of Littleton). You assume that just because Google Maps indicates a mailing address of "Littleton, CO 80127" that it is in the city. ZIP code boundaries often to not match city boundaries; indeed, much of the suburban area south of Denver has "Littleton" ZIP codes even though most of this area is not in Littleton but in other cities such as Centennial and Lone Tree, and in unincorporated Highlands Ranch. Bottom line: Google Maps refers to places based on ZIP code methodology, and just because an address is in a ZIP code assigned with a particular city's name does not mean it is actually in that city (see explanation at ZIP code). Finally, based on your assumption that if Google Maps says those coordinates have a "Littleton" ZIP code then they must be in Littleton, you make a further assumption that since Littleton is the seat of Arapahoe County (or lies mostly within Arapahoe County), then the coordinates must also be in Arapahoe County. They are actually over nine miles from the Arapahoe County line and lie comfortably within Jefferson County. I suggest that before you take it upon yourself to make a pronouncement that each state's center of population is in a particular city or county, that you actually verify such statements by consulting maps showing city and county boundaries and confirming that the coordinates do in fact lie within those boundaries. Even then, this seems to be original research. Watkinsian05:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Watkinsian! Thanks for writing! I don't believe this is original research, since the lat and long numbers are taken from the US Census Bureau. All I've done is tried (to the best of my ability) to tie those lat/long numbers to a particular town, city, or county for each state. And I freely admit that a) I don't have the best tools available; and b) I could be wrong. If you have a suggestion for another web tool that I can use to fix the first part of that, I'll be less likely to fall into the second part of that :) But rather than fearing either of those statement, I'm trying to be bold and add what I believe is relevant and interesting information to articles. As with all of Wikipedia, feel free to correct what I've added - or even delete it, if you feel so called! Thanks again, -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)14:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Dev920 know.
(i have that show at home)so i know the songs,listen:i'm gonna send your vote to college is an independent song,there's no weather show or introduction,it's walkin' on the wall street,not walkin' on wall street,$7.50 once a week,not makin'$7.50 once a week,& scooter computer and mr. chips,not computer rock
"Walkin' on Wall Street" is the actual title - see [1] or [2]
"I'm Gonna Send Your Vote to College" was indeed an independent song. It gets lumped in with America Rock! because that's the easiest category to put it in.
There is an "Introduction" for the Scooter Computer videos - see [3] and [4]
There is a "Greatest Show on Earth" (also called "The Weather Show"). See [5]. It was never aired due to legal troubles with the circus industry.
You're probably right - I think it is "$7.50 Once a Week".
You're right - it's "Scooter Computer & Mr. Chips", but it's often called "Computer Rock" in line with the other four titles.
Things that make ya go Hmmmmmmmmmmm
I saw the change you made to the LGBT banner, and am ambivalent about it. I had to seek out the image itself and read the tag before it made sense to me. At first I wondered why somebody would put a feather over the flag, but the tag explained it was actually a quill. While I don't oppose the image change, I do find it esoteric; and I wonder if anybody will automatically understand it, or be similarly motivated to look at the source to find an explanation. While you didn't ask for my opinion, I'm giving it anyway. I'm meddlesome that way. :-) Jeffpw11:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Jeff - Please - Be Meddlesome! Do you think that could be Wikipedia's new tag line instead of "Be Bold"? Anyway, I'm not strongly in favor of the quill - I just thought the flag looked a little bare in the message box. Maybe just a wavy flag instead of the plain one? Or a pen, like you said Dev. I'll see what I can find today and put a couple options here. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)15:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I think the problem with the flag is not that it was bare looking, but that it was too small. Try enlarging the flag as well. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
K, I made the flag bigger and edited the text. I think the size takes care of what you wanted, but the quill has to go. :) It now looks like a bird dropping. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeh - not too fond of that quill. What do you think of this image:
SatyrTN, I love that image! It makes the point clearly. It might also help deflect the ridiculous criticism of our using the bare flag image on our project template. Well done! Have we achieved consensus now??? :-) Jeffpw20:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I think I added the template: to the first few I tagged, but I certainly don't do that now. And I don't know the exact statistics, but I think the tagging's coming along fairly nicely. We already got one new member as a result, so here's to more! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
LGBT Studies
Hi, thanks for the invite. I am totally overwhelmed with a (non-wikipedia) article I am completing for a 1/1/7 deadline, but this will be on my new years resolution list. NickGorton18:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Bot for Mac!?!?
Hi, Commander! I was wondering about your bot CmdrObot - the page says it's a Mac program. Can you give me some more info? Is it OpenSource? How much Python do I need to know to run it? Anything more than "zero" might be a problem, though I'm proficient in Perl and PHP, so maybe I won't have too much trouble... Anyway, any help you can give would be appreciated. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)03:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm afraid my bot isn't open source, and at the moment it isn't really fit for general consumption: it's got a fairly annoying memory leak, its error handling is a bit lacking, and the user interface could most kindly be described as 'minimal'. I keep meaning to clean it up and make a proper release of it, but other things keep getting in the way. Sorry! Cmdrjameson15:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Edits to Gay Marketing
Hi SatyrNH - I'm new to this wiki world so I hope this is the right place to pose this question. Recently I added Target 10 to the list of gay agencies that specialize in gay marketing (the gay marketing wikipedia entry). I also created an entry for Target 10 in wikipedia so people could learn about this company and its specialty in GLBT marketing. When logging back on to explore/learn wilipedia more I saw that you deleted Target 10 and one other agency from the gay marketing article. Can you tell me why you wanted to make this edit?
I understand wikipedia is not a promotional tool but there are very few agencies that specialize in this area and I think the greater public could benefit by learning who they are (not just my agency). If it's credentials, pls know that Targe 10 has been around for five years and I (the president) have been in gay marketing for 10. My GLBT activism goes back even further.
Could you let me know your thoughts when you have a minute? Also, I see on some of your posts you list LGBT affinity groups on wikipedia. I tried to learn how to join/participate but could not figure it out. Would you mind directing me to the right place to do that?
Thanks for the info on deletions and edits. Much appreciated.
I also visited the LGBT Wiki Project and think I can be of assistance. I will wait until I understand wiki more before I sign on as a participant. Honestly, I do not understand a lot of wiki terminology yet but will make a point to learn. When I am more well-versed I can definitley help out as I know gay history quite well and could assist with edits/improvements. Thanks again. Target 1000:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
tasc
It has to be four reverts in the last 24 hours before he gets blocked. He's done one so far. When he does another, if you see it before I do, place the template {{3RR}} on his talk page. When he does the third revert, he gets {{3RR4}}, and if he reverts a fourth time we report him at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. In order for this to work, our reverts have to come from both of us, so that our three reverts are spread out and don't pile up on one or the other of us. So I've done one revert so far, don't hesitate to do the next one if you see it. I'll be watching as well, and I'm going to ask the observing admin to let us handle it ourselves by the 3RR process instead of locking the template again. — coelacantalk — 16:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Be careful with this kind of talk. It looks like you're ganging up on a user to block him because you don't like his edits. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Dev920, please see Template talk:LGBT for the relevant background. It really is only a 3RR issue, the template had to be locked a couple of days ago because of this user. If he would bother to justify his changes on the talk page it would be a different matter. — coelacantalk — 17:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
And in fact this is exactly what WP:3RR asks us to do, "Any reversions beyond this limit should be performed by other users. This collaboration between agreeing users is intended to demonstrate that the community at large is in agreement over which of two (or more) competing versions is most accurate." — coelacantalk — 17:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Update: now blocked forever. Thanks for your support when I needed it over there. Hit me at my talk page if you ever need anything. Peace! — coelacantalk — 18:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
You posted on my talk page that I am in danger of violating the three-revert rule and may be blocked from editing in the future but how am I in danger of violating the three-revert rule and why may I be blocked when I have only reverted the Matthew Shepard article three times today? And the reason that I have reverted the article is because I think it is VERY disrespectful to Matthew's memory to refer to him as "Shepard". 81.158.88.164
Thanks for your reply. In the place where I live, it is very disrespectful to call a person by their surname and bearing that in mind and also bearing in mind what happened to Matthew and the terrible way that he died, which I found out after watching the Matthew Shephard story on the tv 2 weeks ago and the Laramie Project last week, it's upset me very much which is why I have taken such offense to the constant reversal of the article as to me and a few others who have also read the article, it is very disrespectful to keep referring to Matthew as "Shephard". 81.158.88.164
Far be it from me to disrupt proceedings, but reference to an individual in an encyclopaedia by their surname is far from disrespectful, it is a standard style. Budgiekiller22:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that SatyrBot added the LGBT project template to Talk:Esera Tuaolo, however, the talk page already had this template on there. It now has two of the same template (I'm about to cleanup the talk page so I'll remove the redundant one) but you may want to look into your bot and correct this so it doesn't happen again. VegaDark04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
High Schools
Hi there -- That's a much nicer looking list than the current one. I think you're right about de-emphasizing the counties (though it hadn't occurred to me before, since I use them as mapping units fairly regularly). My one question would be about the horizontal line every 5 schools: it looks good, but how do you think the list would look if you used a line to mark each new letter instead? Maybe it'll look worse that way, but I just expect some people (like me) will be scratching their heads for a moment about the significance of the lines in their current configuration. However, I'll go for looks over meaning if the table looks bad with unevenly-spaced lines.
I'd say go ahead and change the White Mountain School article's title. I found that the school uses "The" occasionally, but not in the most important places (their logo, their contact info, etc.). Just my vote, anyway.
It looks great! I kind of like how at the top of the list you give the reader the choice of how to display it. If I had to choose just one, though, I'd still say do the splitting by letter. Thanks for removing that Proctor Academy redirect, too. I just restored the original text for it. Ken Gallager15:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
NPH edits
Hi! Sorry my tone was a bit snippy, that's been happening the past couple of days. Of course I'm not offended at all. Thanks for your work cleaning up the article! DanB†DanD00:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Gay rights redirects
You tagged many "19xx in gay rights" articles for speedy deletion as "redirects to inappropriate articles." How is the redirect to Timeline of LGBT history inappropriate? Also, please don't tag "inappropriate" redirects as speedy deletable, they're not. If they're redirecting to the wrong place, you just simply change the redirect yourself. Metros23214:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Metros, I believe I used the word "incorrect" place, not inappropriate. And that may not even be the right word for me to have used, but there wasn't a speedy-delete tag that said "This redirect is on one page from a list of pages. It needs to either be an article or a missing page." I was just cleaning up List of years in gay rights and trying to keep things tidy :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)15:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I posted a note about this at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Gay rights redirects to see if I could get some more admin input on this. Your reasoning makes decent enough sense, but apparently there was a deletion vote in December of 2004 that decided this and there's a few issues that I just discovered with that (like, for example, the entire discussion being deleted) that need to be decided and discussed on the noticeboard. Add any input/thoughts you might have about it there. Metros23216:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Years in gay rights nav boxes
I appreciate what you've been doing with the nav boxes on these pages; but perhaps you could refine them a bit, as they make the page too wide to be seen all at once, like most other wikipages, on my screen (which is brand new, a 17 inch). Can you make the LGBT Rights box appear under the nav box, and thus reduce the width of the page? That kind of heavy-duty coding is beyond my ken. --Textorus19:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing that up. I was actually thinking something similar, but hadn't gotten to it yet. My big beef (<grin>) is having too much white space at the top of the page, but I'll see what I can do. What do you think about not having the "Contents" box? I mean, the pages won't be long enough to really use them. Let me put together a couple examples and lets see what works. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)20:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
I think we need the contents boxes, if for no other reason than it makes it possible to go to one particular month and edit there, instead of having to open the entire page for editing, if you follow what I'm saying. My idea would be to have the nav box at the very top, with the contents and LGBT boxes immediately underneath, on the right and on the left. This would also allow the contents box to have it's regular width (at the moment, it looks awkward: section numbers are on different lines from the months), and would thus be shorter. I understand you are trying to minimize white space; not sure how that can be avoided, though. But I'll leave all that up to you :-) I'm working on adding content to various years as I have time.--Textorus20:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
I would vote for #2 myself. You can jump to the section you want from the top of the page; admittedly, more useful in some years than others. Nice work, though, on all of them. :-) --Textorus02:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, I hate that white space between the contents box and the year nav, but I think you're right that it's the best combination. I'll go ahead and make the change. Thanks for your help! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)05:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
No problem. I do understand about the white space, but don't see how to avoid it. Unless you put a picture there (but who has time to find a picture for every year?)--or {LGBT project}, but would that be overdoing it? --Textorus06:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Eeek! I can't even imagine that project!!! :) I'll live with the white-space, thanks! But I'm glad it's looking better - and thanks again for your help! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)06:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Hate to bring this up, but are you aware that the nav box shows the same year on both the right and the left? E.g.:
<<2005 2006 2005>> --Textorus19:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
BTW, I have discovered that 1933, 1940, 1950, 1952, and 1957 all should have content in them, but are redirected to the Timeline of LGBT History. I've no idea how to undo that, do you? --Textorus00:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Short answer - see the comment above this one on my talk page.
Another short answer - they'll stay that way until there's content on them.
